CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 127Educational Technology and AssessmentPsychometric Methodologies and TestingStudent Assessment and Feedback

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Automated essay scoring: Psychometric guidelines and practices

Ramineni, Chaitanya, Williamson, David M.·2013·Assessing Writing
DOI 10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.004

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 70 references

3 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Pearson (2009, March). PTE academic automated scoring. Retrieved from http://www.pearsonpte.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/AutomatedScoringUS.pdf
  2. Stalnaker, 1936, The problem of the English examination, Educational Record, 17, 35
  3. Williamson, 2010, Automated Scoring for the Assessment of Common Core Standards

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–127 of 127

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ramineni, C., & Williamson, D. M.
Affiliations
Educational Testing Service (US)
Corresponding author
Ramineni, Chaitanya
Venue
Assessing Writing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
25-39
ISSN
1075-2935 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.004
OpenAlex
W2088070094
Cited by
127
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4
FWCI
13.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Assessing Writing (publishedVersion)
Funders
Educational Testing Service
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
automated essay scoring, e-rater, psychometric assessment, writing assessment, large-scale assessment, performance expectations, Educational Testing Service

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review