Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 66

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does the writing of undergraduate ESL students develop after one year of study in an English-medium university?

Knoch, Ute, Rouhshad, Amir, Storch, Neomy·2014·Assessing Writing
DOI 10.1016/j.asw.2014.01.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.asw.2014.01.001

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Elder, 2003, Investigating the relationship between intensive EAP training and band score gains on IELTS, IELTS Research Reports, 4, 207
  2. Tsang, 2000, Giving grammar the place it deserves in process writing, Prospect, 15, 34
  3. Xudong, 2010, Academic writing development of ESL/EFL graduate students in NUS, Reflections on English language teaching, 9, 119

Cited by

See all 66

Metadata

Authors
Knoch, U., Rouhshad, A., & Storch, N.
ORCID
Storch, Neomy
Venue
Assessing Writing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
21
Pages
1-17
ISSN
1075-2935
DOI
10.1016/j.asw.2014.01.001
Cited by
66
References
26
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.