CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17Student Assessment and FeedbackEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningDiscourse Analysis in Language Studies

Developing feedback literacy through dialogue-supported performances of multi-draft writing in a postgraduate class

Wu, Peng, Lei, Chunlin·2023·Assessing Writing
DOI 10.1016/j.asw.2023.100759
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.asw.2023.100759

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dialogue aids the peer feedback process in clarifying cognitive conflicts and supporting students emotionally, thereby facilitating revision.

    “Dialogue not only aids the peer feedback process in clarifying cognitive conflicts (Wu and Lei, 2023), but also in supporting students emotionally (Lineback and Holbrook, 2023), thereby facilitating the revision process.”

    From Incorporating peer feedback in academic writing: a systematic review of benefits and challenges (2024) · cites this paper as Wu and Lei, 2023

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, P., & Lei, C.
Affiliations
Shanghai University of International Business and Economics (CN)
Corresponding author
Lei, Chunlin
ORCID
Lei, Chunlin
Venue
Assessing Writing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-07
Volume
57
Pages
100759
ISSN
1075-2935 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.asw.2023.100759
OpenAlex
W4383957047
Cited by
17
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Assessing Writing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Keywords
feedback literacy, peer feedback, academic writing, graduate students, cognitive conflict, reflective journals, writing revision, writing assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review