Cited by 127Fatty Acid Research and HealthInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsEdible Oils Quality and Analysis

EPA and DHA differentially modulate monocyte inflammatory response in subjects with chronic inflammation in part via plasma specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators: A randomized, double-blind, crossover study

Open access
So, Jisun, Wu, Dayong, Lichtenstein, Alice H., Tai, Albert K., Matthan, Nirupa R., Maddipati, Krishna Rao, Lamon-Fava, Stefania·2021·Atherosclerosis

Abstract

Background and aims The independent effects of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) on chronic inflammation through their downstream lipid mediators, including the specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators (SPM), remain unstudied. Therefore, we compared the effects of EPA and DHA supplementation on monocyte inflammatory response and plasma polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) SPM lipidome. Methods After a 4-week lead-in phase (baseline), 9 men and 12 postmenopausal women (50-75 years) with chronic inflammation received two phases of 10-week supplementation with 3 g/day EPA and DHA in a random order, separated by a 10-week washout. Results Compared with baseline, EPA and DHA supplementation differently modulated LPS-stimulated monocyte cytokine expression. EPA lowered TNFA (p Conclusions EPA and DHA had distinct effects on monocyte inflammatory response with a broader effect of DHA in attenuating pro-inflammatory cytokines. These differential effects were potentially mediated by different groups of PUFA derivatives, suggesting immunomodulatory activities of SPM and their intermediates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.11.018

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
So, J., Wu, D., Lichtenstein, A. H., Tai, A. K., Matthan, N. R., Maddipati, K. R., & Lamon-Fava, S.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
Venue
Atherosclerosis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
316
Pages
90-98
ISSN
0021-9150 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3111775211
Cited by
127
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 20
FWCI
9.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Atherosclerosis (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
Keywords
eicosapentaenoic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, omega-3 supplementation, chronic inflammation, specialized pro-resolving mediators, polyunsaturated fatty acids, cytokine expression, TNF-α, IL-10, MCP-1, hydroxy fatty acids, docosapentaenoic acid, postmenopausal women
MeSH terms
Docosahexaenoic Acids, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Male, Monocytes, Eicosapentaenoic Acid, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Cross-Over Studies, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review