Cited by 60Cardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesSurgical site infection preventionInfectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions

Incidence of Sternal Infection in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting

Open access
Momin, Aziz U., Deshpande, Ranjit, Potts, James, El-Gamel, Ahmed, Marrinan, Michael T., Omigie, Joseph, Desai, Jatin B.·2005·The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Abstract

Background Bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) bypass grafts have advantages over single internal thoracic artery (SITA) bypass grafts in the medium term, particularly in diabetics. However, the perceived higher sternal complication rates seen in diabetics have led many surgeons to avoid the use of BITA surgery. The aim of our study was to assess the validity of this approach by assessing the incidence of sternal infections over a 10-year period in one institution.Methods A retrospective analysis was made of our coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients over a 10-year period (7,581 patients). Nine hundred and twenty-two of the patients were diabetics (261 insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus [IDDM]). Of the insulin-dependent diabetics, 166 had SITA, and 95 had BITA grafts.Results There was no significant difference in this subgroup in terms of gender, preoperative angina, dyspnea class, left ventricular function, and number of distal anastomoses. Comparing the rates of sternal wound complications of SITA and BITA in IDDM are the following: (1) superficial sternal infection, 6.6% in SITA, 1.1% in BITA (p = 0.04); (2) deep sternal infection, 1.2% in SITA, 3.2% in BITA (p = 0.27); (3) sternal dehiscence, 1.2% in SITA, 3.2% in BITA (p = 0.27).Conclusions Our data do not support the perception that BITA grafting increases the risk of sternal complications in insulin-dependent diabetic patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.04.061

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Momin, A. U., Deshpande, R., Potts, J., El-Gamel, A., Marrinan, M. T., Omigie, J., & Desai, J. B.
Affiliations
King's College Hospital (GB)
Venue
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-11
Volume
80
Issue
5
Pages
1765-1772
ISSN
0003-4975 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118951651
Cited by
60
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical site infection prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions
Keywords
sternal wound infection, bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting, coronary artery bypass grafting, diabetes mellitus, type 1 diabetes, sternal wound complications, sternal dehiscence, deep sternal infection
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Infections, Male, Mammary Arteries, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Risk Factors, Sternum, Surgical Wound Infection, Incidence, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review