Metastasectomy for synchronous solitary non-small cell lung cancer metastases
Abstract
Background Surgical treatment of patients with limited metastatic lesions from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial; however, reports suggest that a subset of patients may benefit from complete resection including metastasectomy.Methods Between 1997 and 2009, 99 patients underwent complete solitary synchronous NSCLC metastasis resection in a single center. Only patients who met the potentially curative operation criteria (ie, primary NSCLC and metastasis resection of a solitary pulmonary or solitary extrapulmonary metastases) were included for retrospective analyses within this study.Results The overall 5-year survival rate was 38%. A significantly longer survival was observed in patients without mediastinal (N2 or N3) lymph node involvement (median, 50.0 months) compared with patients who had mediastinal lymph node metastases (median, 19.0 months survival; p=0.015). In patients with a solitary metastasis in the ipsilateral (not ipsilobar) or contralateral lung, we observed a 5-year survival rate of 48.5%, whereas the rate was 23.6% in patients with extrapulmonary metastases (p=0.006). In univariate analysis, a trend for a more favorable long-term survival rate was observed for patients with a histologic grade of G1 or G2 versus G3 primary NSCLC (p=0.058).Conclusions We conclude that metastasectomy for synchronous oligometastatic disease in NSCLC can be performed in selected patients. It appears reasonable that such patients should be considered as surgical candidates if mediastinal lymph node involvement is excluded.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery have been shown to produce long-term survivors in patients with a solitary lesion in the contralateral lung.
“Both surgery [169, 170] and SRS [171, 172] have been shown to result in long-term survivors in this setting [IV, B].”
From Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (2016) · cites this paper as [170]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 88
- Authors
- Tönnies, M., Pfannschmidt, J., Bauer, T. T., Kollmeier, J., Tönnies, S., & Kaiser, D.
- Affiliations
- Helios Kliniken (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Pfannschmidt, Joachim
- Venue
- The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 249-256
- ISSN
- 0003-4975 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993373616
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 7.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Metastasis and carcinoma case studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
- Keywords
- metastasectomy, non-small cell lung cancer, oligometastatic disease, mediastinal lymph node metastasis, extrapulmonary metastasis, survival, histologic grade, surgical resection
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Germany, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Lymphatic Metastasis, Male, Mediastinum, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Multiple Primary, Pneumonectomy, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Metastasectomy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review