Cited by 88Lung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentMetastasis and carcinoma case studiesLung Cancer Research Studies

Metastasectomy for synchronous solitary non-small cell lung cancer metastases

Tönnies, Mario, Pfannschmidt, Joachim, Bauer, Torsten T., Kollmeier, Jens, Tönnies, Simone, Kaiser, Dirk·2014·The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Abstract

Background Surgical treatment of patients with limited metastatic lesions from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial; however, reports suggest that a subset of patients may benefit from complete resection including metastasectomy.Methods Between 1997 and 2009, 99 patients underwent complete solitary synchronous NSCLC metastasis resection in a single center. Only patients who met the potentially curative operation criteria (ie, primary NSCLC and metastasis resection of a solitary pulmonary or solitary extrapulmonary metastases) were included for retrospective analyses within this study.Results The overall 5-year survival rate was 38%. A significantly longer survival was observed in patients without mediastinal (N2 or N3) lymph node involvement (median, 50.0 months) compared with patients who had mediastinal lymph node metastases (median, 19.0 months survival; p=0.015). In patients with a solitary metastasis in the ipsilateral (not ipsilobar) or contralateral lung, we observed a 5-year survival rate of 48.5%, whereas the rate was 23.6% in patients with extrapulmonary metastases (p=0.006). In univariate analysis, a trend for a more favorable long-term survival rate was observed for patients with a histologic grade of G1 or G2 versus G3 primary NSCLC (p=0.058).Conclusions We conclude that metastasectomy for synchronous oligometastatic disease in NSCLC can be performed in selected patients. It appears reasonable that such patients should be considered as surgical candidates if mediastinal lymph node involvement is excluded.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.03.028

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 88

Authors
Tönnies, M., Pfannschmidt, J., Bauer, T. T., Kollmeier, J., Tönnies, S., & Kaiser, D.
Affiliations
Helios Kliniken (DE)
Corresponding author
Pfannschmidt, Joachim
Venue
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
249-256
ISSN
0003-4975 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993373616
Cited by
88
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5
FWCI
7.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Metastasis and carcinoma case studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
metastasectomy, non-small cell lung cancer, oligometastatic disease, mediastinal lymph node metastasis, extrapulmonary metastasis, survival, histologic grade, surgical resection
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Germany, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Lymphatic Metastasis, Male, Mediastinum, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Multiple Primary, Pneumonectomy, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Metastasectomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review