Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 181 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation
FDG-PET or PET/CT has higher sensitivity and specificity than bone scintigraphy for detecting bone metastasis.
“Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET or PET/CT has higher sensitivity and specificity than bone scintigraphy [34].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
MRI is more sensitive than CT for imaging the central nervous system in patients with NSCLC.
“MRI is more sensitive than CT scan [32].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
PET/CT is the most sensitive modality for detecting bone metastasis.
“PET/CT is the most sensitive modality in detecting bone metastasis [33].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The T790M mutation is the most common finding in EGFR-mutated tumours that relapse after first- or second-generation EGFR TKI therapy.
“the most common finding in EGFR-mutated tumours relapsing after first-/secondgeneration EGFR TKI therapy [19].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The switch maintenance benefit of pemetrexed was observed only in patients with non-squamous cell carcinoma.
“In the case of pemetrexed, this benefit was seen only in patients with NSCC [I, B].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Activating (sensitising) EGFR mutations predict response to the EGFR TKIs gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib.
“Activating (sensitising) EGFR mutations are predictive for response to the EGFR TKIs gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Tumours without EGFR expression as assessed by IHC did not show any benefit from the addition of necitumumab.
“In a retrospective analysis, tumours without EGFR expression as assessed by IHC, did not show any benefit from the addition of necitumumab.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
One meta-analysis from individual patient data shows slightly longer overall survival for cisplatin-based versus carboplatin-based doublet in patients with non-squamous NSCLC treated with third-generation regimens.
“One meta-analysis from individual patient data has shown slightly longer OS for cisplatin-based versus carboplatinbased doublet in patients with NSCC and treated with thirdgeneration regimens [I, B] [49].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Several phase III trials established single-agent therapy (docetaxel, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine) as the standard of care for first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC patients aged ≥70.
“Several phase III trials established single-agent therapy (docetaxel, vinorelbine or gemcitabine) as the standard of care for first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC patients aged ≥70 [69,71].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
The superiority of carboplatin-based combinations over monotherapy in PS 2 patients has been identified in a subgroup analysis within large phase III trials, with an acceptable toxicity profile.
“In addition, the superiority of carboplatin-based combinations over monotherapy in PS 2 patients has been identified in a subgroup analysis within large phase III trials, with an acceptable toxicity profile [66].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [66] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
One study comparing monthly carboplatin plus weekly paclitaxel versus single-agent vinorelbine or gemcitabine in patients aged 70-89 with PS 0-2 found a survival advantage for combination therapy.
“Among the largest prospective phase III trials in elderly patients, one study comparing monthly carboplatin plus weekly paclitaxel versus single-agent vinorelbine or gemcitabine in patients aged 70-89 with PS 0-2 found a survival advantage for combination therapy [66].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [66] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Pemetrexed-based combination chemotherapy shows a slight but significant survival benefit compared with gemcitabine- or docetaxel-based combinations.
“Pemetrexed-based combination chemotherapy represents a therapeutic option, based on the results of a recent meta-analysis that showed a slight but significant survival benefit compared with gemcitabine-or docetaxel-based combinations and of a pre-planned subgroup analysis of a large randomised phase III trial [II, A] [54, 55].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Data show good tolerability of nab-PC in patients aged ≥70, comparable to that in younger counterparts.
“With regard to particular platinum-based combinations, data show a good tolerability of nab-PC in patients aged ≥70, a tolerability comparable to that in younger counterparts [74].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [74] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Bevacizumab delayed the incidence of brain metastases in a retrospective analysis.
“Treatment with bevacizumab also delayed the incidence of brain metastases in a retrospective analysis [63].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Comprehensive geriatric assessment can predict morbidity and mortality in elderly cancer patients.
“CGA can predict morbidity and mortality in elderly patients with cancer [75]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [75] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Necitumumab added to cisplatin/pemetrexed does not increase survival in first-line treatment of metastatic non-squamous NSCLC.
“Necitumumab, an immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody against EGFR, did not show any evidence that its addition to cisplatin/pemetrexed is able to increase survival in first-line treatment of metastatic NSCC [51].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A recent phase III trial did not show that allocating chemotherapy by comprehensive geriatric assessment improves survival in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.
“a recently published phase III trial did not demonstrate an improvement in survival outcomes of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC deriving from CGA-based allocation of chemotherapy [76].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the erlotinib switch maintenance trial, subgroup analyses showed benefit only in patients with stable disease after induction, not in those with tumour response.
“In the erlotinib trial, subgroup analyses revealed a benefit restricted to patients with stable disease (SD) after induction treatment, as opposed to patients with tumour response.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Comprehensive geriatric assessment can help tailor cancer management to an individual elderly patient's fitness or frailty.
“CGA can predict morbidity and mortality in elderly patients with cancer [75] and can help to adapt cancer management to each Volume 27 | Supplement 5 | September 2016 doi:10.1093/annonc/mdw326| v Annals of Oncology clinical practice guidelines patient's fitness or frailty [III, C]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [III, C]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The IUNO study did not meet its primary end point of overall survival.
“the IUNO study, which failed to meet its primary end point of OS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [78]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A large phase III randomised trial found that continuation pemetrexed after four induction cycles of cisplatin plus pemetrexed improves PFS and OS in PS 0-1 patients, confirmed at long-term follow-up.
“A large phase III randomised trial of continuation maintenance with pemetrexed versus placebo after four induction cycles of cisplatin plus pemetrexed chemotherapy demonstrated a PFS and OS improvement in patients with a PS 0-1, confirmed at longterm follow-up [80,81].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Randomised trials of continuation maintenance have shown improvements in PFS and OS.
“Randomised trials investigating continuation maintenance have shown an improvement of PFS and OS [79,80].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Two meta-analyses showed a consistent significant improvement of response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival for the combination of bevacizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy compared with platinum-based chemotherapy alone in eligible patients with non-squamous NSCLC.
“two meta-analyses showed a consistent significant improvement of RR, PFS and OS for the combination of bevacizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy, compared with platinum-based chemotherapy alone in eligible patients with NSCC [61,62].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
The improvement in overall survival and progression-free survival from adding necitumumab was more pronounced in patients with EGFR-expressing tumours (median OS 11.7 vs 10.0 months; HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.92; P=0.002; median PFS 5.7 vs 5.5 months, HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.92; P=0.018).
“This improvement in OS and PFS was more pronounced in the group of patients with EGFR-expressing tumours (median OS 11.7 months versus 10.0 months; HR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.69-0.92;P = 0.002; median PFS 5.7 months versus 5.5 months, HR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72-0.92;P = 0.018) [53].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Most individual trials and meta-analyses evaluating first-line chemotherapy options in advanced NSCLC did not report differential efficacy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma.
“Most individual trials and metaanalyses evaluating chemotherapy options in the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC did not report any differential efficacy in patients with SCC [43].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
There are no data to support the use of front-line cytotoxic treatment over best supportive care alone in patients with PS >2.
“Nevertheless, there are no data to support the use of front-line cytotoxic treatment over BSC alone in PS >2 patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Smoking reduces erlotinib bioavailability.
“smoking reduces erlotinib bioavailability [40].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In a randomised trial, erlotinib was equivalent to pemetrexed or docetaxel in refractory unselected patients.
“Erlotinib was shown to be equivalent to pemetrexed or docetaxel in refractory ( progression during the four cycles of a standard platinum-based chemotherapy doublet), unselected patients in a randomised trial [89].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events were less common with pembrolizumab than with docetaxel: 13% for 2 mg/kg, 16% for 10 mg/kg, and 35% for docetaxel.
“Grade 3-5 treatment-related AEs were less common with pembrolizumab than with docetaxel [43 (13%) of 339 patients given 2 mg/kg, 55 (16%) of 343 given 10 mg/kg and 109 (35%) of 309 given docetaxel].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [96] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Nintedanib plus docetaxel was associated with more gastrointestinal adverse events and transient liver enzyme elevation than docetaxel alone.
“Compared with docetaxel, the combination of nintedanib and docetaxel was associated with a higher incidence of gastrointestinal AEs and transient elevation of liver enzymes [102].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [102] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Unplanned analyses in LUME Lung 1 showed a pronounced OS impact in patients with fast-progressing disease and in those refractory to first-line chemotherapy.
“Additional unplanned analyses revealed a pronounced impact on OS in patients with fast-progressing disease and patients who were refractory to first-line chemotherapy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [102] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The phase III KEYNOTE-010 trial randomised 1034 previously treated NSCLC patients with PD-L1 expression on at least 1% of tumour cells to pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg, pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg, or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks.
“The phase III KEYNOTE-010 trial randomised 1034 patients with previously treated NSCLC with PD-L1 expression on at least 1% of tumour cells to receive pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg, pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg or docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [96] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In CheckMate 017, nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks improved survival by 3.2 months compared with docetaxel in previously treated SCC.
“A phase III trial (CheckMate 017) in patients previously treated for SCC compared 3 mg/kg of nivolumab given every 2 weeks with docetaxel, showing an improvement of 3.2 months [97,98]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Patient-reported outcomes showed no impact of nintedanib plus docetaxel on quality of life.
“However, no impact on QoL has been reported by the analysis of patient-reported outcomes [103].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [103] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A trend towards improved OS was seen when analysing 58% of events among 253 randomised patients in that study.
“although a trend towards improved OS was seen when analysing 58% of events of 253 patients randomised for this study [83].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [83] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In a Japanese randomised trial of 154 EGFR-mutated patients, erlotinib plus bevacizumab improved median PFS versus erlotinib alone (16.0 versus 9.7 months, HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.36-0.79, P=0.0015).
“In a Japanese randomised trial, 154 EGFR-mutated patients were randomised to receive erlotinib and bevacizumab or erlotinib alone (75 patients in the combination arm and 77 in the erlotinib alone arm were included in the efficacy analyses) [116].Median PFS was 16.0 months (95% CI: 13.9-18.1)with erlotinib plus bevacizumab and 9.7 months (95% CI: 5.7-11.1)with erlotinib alone (HR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [116] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Combination chemotherapy regimens have not shown an OS benefit over single-agent treatments.
“Combination chemotherapy regimens failed to show any OS benefit over single-agent treatments [85].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [85] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A large randomised phase III trial showed comparable outcomes with pemetrexed or erlotinib.
“Finally, a large randomised phase III trial showed comparable outcome with pemetrexed or erlotinib [90].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [90] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Subgroup analyses of a phase III trial of erlotinib versus docetaxel as second- or third-line therapy showed superior PFS but not OS for docetaxel in EGFR wild-type patients.
“Subgroup analyses of a phase III trial of erlotinib versus docetaxel as second-or third-line therapy demonstrated superior PFS but not OS for docetaxel treatment in WT EGFR [92].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [92] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Pembrolizumab produced a higher outcome in patients with high PD-L1 expression (>50%).
“Pembrolizumab achieved a higher outcome for those patients with high PD-L1 expression (>50%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [96] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A retrospective analysis reported a predictive impact of histology on pemetrexed outcome favouring NSCC (median OS 8.0 versus 9.3 months, docetaxel versus pemetrexed, HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.61-1.0, P=0.004).
“In a retrospective analysis, a predictive impact of histology on outcome by pemetrexed was reported favouring those patients with NSCC (median OS: 8.0 versus 9.3 months, docetaxel versus pemetrexed, HR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.61-1.0,P = 0.004) [56].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Patients with PS 3-4 may also receive an EGFR TKI because they are likely to obtain clinical benefit similar to patients with good PS.
“Patients with PS 3-4 may also be offered an EGFR TKI, as they are likely to receive a similar clinical benefit to patients with good PS [II, A] [113].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [113] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Erlotinib improved OS in second- or third-line treatment of all NSCLC histological subtypes in patients not eligible for further chemotherapy, including those with PS 3.
“Erlotinib improved OS in second line or in third line in all NSCLC histological subtype patients not eligible for further chemotherapy, including patients with PS 3 [88].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [88] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In CheckMate 017, PD-L1 expression was neither prognostic nor predictive of clinical benefit in a retrospective analysis using various cut points.
“The expression of PD-L1 was neither prognostic nor predictive of clinical benefit in a retrospective analysis using various cut points in this study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
There is currently no evidence that adding upfront whole brain radiotherapy to surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery affects OS.
“There is currently no evidence that adding upfront whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) to surgery or to SRS has an impact on OS [I, A] [151].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [151]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In RPA class III patients, median survival is less than 2 months.
“only BSC is recommended, as their median survival is <2 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [148] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The most common mechanism of acquired resistance, occurring in 49%-60%, is the T790M mutation in exon 20.
“The most common (49%-60%) mechanism of acquired resistance is the acquisition of a single recurrent missense mutation within exon 20, the T790M mutation [119, 120].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Zoledronic acid reduces skeletal-related events, including pathological fracture, radiation or surgery to bone, and spinal cord compression.
“Zoledronic acid reduces skeletal-related events (SREs) ( pathological fracture, radiation or surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression) and is recommended in stage IV bone metastatic disease [II,B] [160].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [160] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Thoracoscopic talc poudrage is more effective than talc slurry sclerosis.
“thoracoscopic insufflation with talc ( poudrage) is more effective than talc slurry sclerosis [II, B] [145].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [145] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In an exploratory analysis of a large phase III trial, denosumab was associated with improved median OS in a subgroup of 702 metastatic NSCLC patients.
“In an exploratory analysis of a large phase III trial, denosumab was associated with improved median OS in the subgroup of 702 metastatic NSCLC patients [162].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [162] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
If T790M is detected in peripheral blood, treatment with third-generation EGFR TKIs is justified.
“In the event that a T790M mutation in peripheral blood is observed, treatment with third-generation EGFR TKIs is justified [130].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [130] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Vascular stenting might be useful in NSCLC-related superior vena cava compression.
“Vascular stenting might be useful in NSCLC-related superior vena cava compression [II, B].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [II, B]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A phase II study showed a PFS benefit in patients who continued first-line erlotinib beyond radiological progression.
“A phase II study has demonstrated benefit in PFS in patients who continued first-line erlotinib beyond radiological progression [131]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [131] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Retrospective series and case reports suggest that continuing an EGFR TKI with local treatment may be reasonable in patients with single-site radiological progression, ongoing driver oncogene addiction, and no rapid systemic progression.
“Evidence from retrospective series and case reports suggests that, in patients where there is evidence of radiological progression in a single site (i.e.CNS metastasis or adrenal gland), but with ongoing dependence on the driver oncogene addiction and without rapid systemic progression, the combination of continuing the EGFR TKI with local treatment (radiotherapy or surgery) may represent a reason”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [132] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In PROFILE 1007, median PFS was 7.7 months with crizotinib versus 3.0 months with chemotherapy (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.37-0.64, P<0.001).
“The median PFS, as determined by independent radiological review, was 7.7 months (95% CI: 6.0-8.8) in the crizotinib group, compared with 3.0 months (95% CI: 2.6-4.3) in the chemotherapy group (HR for disease progression or death with crizotinib 0.49, 95% CI: 0.37-0.64,P < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [135] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Endoscopic debulking by laser, cryotherapy or stent placement may help in symptomatic major airway obstruction or postobstructive infection.
“Endoscopy has a role to play in palliative care, notably in case of symptomatic major airway obstruction or postobstructive infection, where endoscopic debulking by laser, cryotherapy or stent placement may be helpful [III, C].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [III, C]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Endoscopy is useful in the diagnosis and treatment of haemoptysis.
“Endoscopy is useful in the diagnosis and treatment (endobronchial or by guiding endovascular embolisation) of haemoptysis [III, C].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [III, C]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In outpatients undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery, treatment-related side-effects occur in 8% of cases.
“In outpatients undergoing SRS, treatment-related side-effects occur in 8% of cases, findings that indicate SRS as a valid alternative to WBRT in fit patients [IV, C].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [152] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In ALK-positive patients progressing on crizotinib, ceritinib or alectinib shows activity against CNS disease.
“In ALK-positive patients progressing on crizotinib, treatment with ceritinib or alectinib shows activity against CNS disease [III, B].”
- Also stated in: § Role of palliative surgery in stage IV NSCLC · plain
“In ALK-positive patients progressing on crizotinib, treatment with ceritinib or alectinib shows activity against CNS disease [III, B].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [III, B]
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Role of palliative surgery in stage IV NSCLC · plain
- Premisecitation
Talc is more effective than bleomycin or tetracycline as a sclerosing agent for pleurodesis.
“The preferred sclerosing agent is talc, which is more effective than bleomycin or tetracycline [II, B] [144];”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [144]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A retrospective review of 94 ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients with brain metastases in a phase I ceritinib expansion study found intracranial disease control rates of 65.3% in crizotinib-pretreated patients and 78.9% in TKI-naive patients.
“Retrospective review of 94 ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients with brain metastases in a phase I expansion study of ceritinib, of which 75 were ALK inhibitor-pretreated, revealed an intracranial disease control rate (DCR) of 65.3% in crizotinib-pretreated patients and 78.9% in TKI-naive patients [139].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [139] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In another small cohort of patients with measurable brain disease in a phase 2 trial, 75% achieved an intracranial objective response.
“In another small cohort of patients with measurable brain disease being enrolled in another phase 2 trial, 75% of patients achieved an intracranial objective response [141].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Among patients with a druggable oncogene driver (EGFR or ALK), 44%-60% develop brain metastases during the course of disease.
“Among those patients with a druggable oncogene driver (EGFR, ALK), between 44% and 60% develop brain metastases in the course of their disease”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In a prospective single-arm phase II trial, after systemic treatment and radical local radiotherapy or surgery of all tumour lesions, 13% of patients remained disease free at 3 years.
“With systemic treatment and radical local radiotherapy (brain SRS or high-dose fractionated radiotherapy) or surgery of all tumour lesions, the trial reported that 13% of patients remained disease free at 3 years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [173] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In patients with a druggable oncogene driver and clinically asymptomatic brain metastases, next-generation TKIs may restore control of brain disease and delay cranial radiotherapy.
“In patients with a druggable oncogene driver and clinically asymptomatic brain metastases, next-generation TKIs may restore control of brain disease and delay cranial radiotherapy [III, B].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [III, B]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Whole-brain radiotherapy schedules of 20 Gy in 5 fractions and 30 Gy in 10 fractions do not differ in outcome.
“WBRT schedules of 20 Gy in 5 fractions or 30 Gy in 10 fractions have no difference in outcome [I, A].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [I, A]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In a study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in advanced cancers, the time until pain interfered with daily life was longer in denosumab-treated patients who had no or mild pain interference at baseline.
“In the study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in patients with advanced cancers, the time extent to which pain interfered with daily life (used as surrogate for QoL) was longer in patients treated with denosumab and with no pain or mild pain interference at baseline [163].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [163] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Immune-related response criteria have been proposed and validated in malignant melanoma to better assess responses to immunostimulatory monoclonal antibodies.
“More recently, immune-related response criteria (irRC) have been proposed and validated in malignant melanoma to better assess the variety of responses that can be generated upon imAbs [176,177].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
In that retrospective series, nodal status did not affect survival on univariate analysis.
“It is to note that in this series nodal status did not affect survival on univariate analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [174] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In stage IV NSCLC, patients with one to three synchronous metastases at diagnosis can achieve long-term disease-free survival after systemic therapy plus radical local treatment (high-dose radiotherapy or surgery).
“Stage IV patients with one to three synchronous metastases at diagnosis may experience long-term disease-free survival (DFS) following systemic therapy and radical local treatment (high-dose radiotherapy or surgery) [III, B].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [III, B]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A systematic review identified 757 NSCLC patients who had been treated for one to five synchronous or metachronous metastases.
“A systematic literature review identified 757 NSCLC patients treated with 1-5 synchronous or metachronous metastases [167].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [167] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Zoledronic acid reduces skeletal-related events (pathological fracture, radiation or surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression) in stage IV bone metastatic disease.
“Zoledronic acid reduces SREs (pathological fracture, radiation/surgery to bone or spinal cord compression) and is recommended in stage IV bone metastatic disease [II, B].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [II, B]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In stage IV NSCLC, patients with limited metachronous metastases may achieve long-term DFS after radical local treatment.
“Stage IV patients with limited metachronous metastases may be treated with a radical local treatment as some may experience long-term DFS [III, B].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [III, B]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In a retrospective study of 37 patients with synchronous NSCLC and brain metastasis both surgically excised, 1-year OS was 62% and 2-year OS was 24%.
“In a retrospective study of 37 patients with synchronous NSCLC and brain metastasis, which were both surgically excised [174], the 1-and 2-year OS rates were 62% and 24%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [174] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery have been shown to produce long-term survivors in patients with a solitary lesion in the contralateral lung.
“Both surgery [169, 170] and SRS [171, 172] have been shown to result in long-term survivors in this setting [IV, B].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
- May combine two claims. 73
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 7
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFDG-PET/CT offers the highest sensitivity for assessing mediastinal lymph nodes and distant metastasis.
“FDG-PET/CT scan offers the highest sensitivity for mediastinal lymph nodes [35] and distant metastasis assessment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNGS testing panels provide data on HER2, BRAF, and MET mutations, which may allow access to targeted treatment in late lines of therapy, often in clinical trials, and can be associated with significant survival outcome.
“NGS testing panels will also provide data on HER2, BRAF and MET mutations, for example, which may allow access to targeted treatment in late lines of therapy, often in the context of a clinical trial, and, in addition, with a significant survival outcome [26][27][28].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26][27][28]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBenefit was observed across all subgroups, but increased toxicity (notably febrile neutropaenia and sepsis-related deaths) was observed.
“Benefit was observed across all subgroups, but increased toxicity (notably febrile neutropaenia and sepsis-related deaths) was observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [66]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOne trial of gemcitabine/cisplatin with or without bevacizumab demonstrated an objective response rate and modest progression-free survival advantage, but no overall survival benefit.
“While one trial of non-taxane, gemcitabine/cisplatin combination with or without bevacizumab demonstrated an objective RR (ORR) and modest PFS advantage, but no OS benefit [60]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTreatment with EGFR TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib) in the first-line setting results in improved response rate, progression-free survival, tolerability, and quality of life compared with platinum-based chemotherapy.
“Such treatments result in improved response rate (RR) and progressionfree survival (PFS), better tolerability and superior quality of life (QoL) compared with platinum-based chemotherapy in the firstline setting, as demonstrated in several randomised trials [21].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe survival benefit of pemetrexed plus platinum holds true for cisplatin-containing regimens but not for carboplatin-based regimens.
“The survival benefit of carboplatin in combination with pemetrexed has been investigated in a meta-analysis (exploratory subgroup analysis); survival benefit for pemetrexed plus platinum held true for cisplatin-containing regimens but not for carboplatin-based regimens [54]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn that study, median overall survival was 10.3 months for doublet chemotherapy and 6.2 months for monotherapy (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.52-0.78; P<0.0001); 1-year survival was 44.5% and 25.4%, respectively.
“Median OS was 10.3 months for doublet chemotherapy and 6.2 months for monotherapy (HR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.52-0.78;P < 0.0001); 1-year survival was 44.5% (95% CI: 37.9-50.9)and 25.4% (95% CI: 19.9-31.3),respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [66]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPatients who have smoked may feel stigmatised or guilty after diagnosis and more pessimistic about their illness and likely outcomes, which may have adverse implications for health-related quality of life.
“patients who have smoked may feel stigmatised or guilty after diagnosis and more pessimistic about their illness and likely outcomes, all of which may have adverse implications for health-related QoL [41].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the SQUIRE trial, adding necitumumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine produced a significant overall survival improvement (11.5 vs 9.9 months, HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.96; P=0.01) and progression-free survival improvement, with 1-year survival of 48% in the experimental arm versus 43% in the control arm.
“In the SQUIRE trial, the addition of necitumumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine produced a significant OS improvement [11.5 versus 9.9 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.84, 95% CI: 0.74-0.96;P = 0.01] and PFS improvement, with a 1-year survival equal to 48% in the experimental arm versus 43% in the control arm [52].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [52]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn that trial, median OS was 13.9 months with pemetrexed versus 11.0 months with placebo; 1- and 2-year survival rates were 58% and 32% with pemetrexed versus 45% and 21% with placebo.
“Median OS was 13.9 months (95% CI: 12.8-16.0months) pemetrexed and 11.0 months (95% CI: 10.0-12.5 months) placebo, with 1-and 2-year survival rates significantly longer for patients given pemetrexed (58% and 32%, respectively) than for those given placebo (45% and 21%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [80]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [81] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe nab-paclitaxel/carboplatin (nab-PC) regimen has a significantly higher response rate compared with solvent-based paclitaxel/carboplatin (sb-PC) and less neurotoxicity in a large phase 3 trial.
“The albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel)/carboplatin (nab-PC) regimen has been shown in a large phase 3 trial to have a significantly higher RR compared with the solventbased paclitaxel/carboplatin (sb-PC) and less neurotoxicity [I, B] [50].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwo meta-analyses reported a favourable response rate but increased toxicity (notably haematological) with doublet compared with single-agent therapy in elderly patients, while a statistically superior overall survival was observed in one of them, in which a subgroup analysis favoured platinum-based doublets.
“Two meta-analyses reported a favourable RR but showed increased toxicity (notably haematological toxicity) with doublet-compared with single-agent therapy [72,73], while a statistically superior OS was observed in one of them, in which a subgroup analysis favoured platinum-based doublets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [72]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [73]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing platinum-based doublets versus single-agent regimens in first-line therapy of PS 2 patients revealed platinum-based regimens to be superior in terms of response rate and survival (74% higher probability of being alive after 1 year) despite an increase in toxicities (mainly haematological).
“A recently published meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing the efficacy and safety of platinum-based doublets versus single-agent regimens in the first-line therapy of PS 2 patients revealed platinum-based regimens to be superior in terms of RR and survival (74% higher probability of being alive after 1 year) despite an increase in toxicities (mainly haematological) [65].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn stage IV NSCLC, chemotherapy compared with best supportive care reduces the risk of death by 23%, improves 1-year survival by 9%, increases median survival by 1.5 months, and improves quality of life, irrespective of age, sex, histology, and performance status.
“Benefits of chemotherapy versus best supportive care (BSC, namely a 23% reduction of risk of death, a 1-year survival gain of 9% and 1.5-month absolute increase in median survival and improved QoL) are observed irrespective of age, sex, histology and PS in two meta-analyses [42,43].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [42]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [43]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere is no overall survival benefit of six cycles versus fewer cycles of first-line platinum-based doublets, although six cycles are associated with longer progression-free survival and significantly higher toxicity.
“Neither a large individual trial nor a meta-analysis found an overall survival (OS) benefit of six versus fewer cycles of first-line platinum-based doublets, although a longer PFS coupled with significantly higher toxicity was reported in patients receiving six cycles [46,47].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [46]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [47]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwo randomised phase III switch maintenance trials found that pemetrexed and erlotinib each improve PFS and OS compared with placebo after four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy.
“Two randomised phase III switch maintenance trials have reported improvements in PFS and OS with pemetrexed [57] and erlotinib [77] versus placebo following four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [57]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [77]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPlatinum-based combinations reduce the risk of death at 1 year by 22% compared with non-platinum combinations, without an unacceptable increase in toxicity.
“Based on a 2006 meta-analysis, revealing a statistically significant reduction (equal to 22%) in the risk of death at 1 year for platinum over non-platinum combinations, without induction of unacceptable increase in toxicity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn EGFR wild-type patients who had not progressed after four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy, early erlotinib maintenance did not improve OS compared with erlotinib at progression, with HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.85-1.22, P=0.8183, and identical 1-year event-free rates.
“in patients with EGFR wild-type (WT) tumours who had not progressed following four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy, and who had received 'early erlotinib' in the first-line maintenance setting, OS was not superior to erlotinib treatment upon disease progression (HR 1.02; 95% CI: 0.85-1.22;P = 0.8183) and 1-year event-free rates were the same in both treatment groups [78].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [78]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwo-agent chemotherapy regimens have a survival benefit over one-agent regimens, but three-agent regimens show no survival benefit over two-agent regimens.
“The survival benefit of two-agent over one-agent chemotherapy regimens was reported in a metaanalysis in 2004, with no survival benefit seen for three-agent over two-agent regimens [44].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premiseown dataIn CheckMate-057, the nivolumab arm had lower rates of serious adverse events (CTC grade 3/4: 10% versus 54%) and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (5% versus 15%) than docetaxel.
“In the nivolumab arm, compared with docetaxel, a lower frequency of both serious adverse events (SAEs; CTC grade 3/4 events: 10% versus 54%) and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation (5% versus 15%) were observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningNone of the studies comparing EGFR TKIs with platinum-based chemotherapy have shown an OS benefit for the TKI, likely because of high crossover.
“Notably, none of the above studies have shown any benefit in OS for an EGFR TKI over platinum-based chemotherapy, likely due to the high level of crossover.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAn unplanned pooled OS analysis of LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6 found an OS benefit for afatinib versus chemotherapy in EGFR del-19 mutations (median 27.3 versus 24.3 months, HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66-0.99, P=0.0374), but not in L858R mutations.
“However, an unplanned pooled OS analysis of patients who have been recruited to either the LUX-Lung 3 or the LUX-Lung 6 trial revealed an OS benefit for afatinib compared with chemotherapy in patients with EGFR del-19 mutations (median OS: 27.3 versus 24.3 months; HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.66-0.99;P = 0.0374), whereas this improvement was not observed in patients with EGFR L858R mutations [II, A] [115].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [115] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn KEYNOTE-010, OS was significantly longer for pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg versus docetaxel (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.58-0.88, P=0.0008) and for pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg versus docetaxel (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.75, P<0.0001), with median OS of 10.4, 12.7 and 8.5 months respectively.
“In the entire population, OS was significantly longer for pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg versus docetaxel (HR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.58-0.88;P = 0.0008) and for pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg versus docetaxel (HR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.49-0.75;P < 0.0001), with median OS of 10.4, 12.7 and 8.5 months in the three arms, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [96] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a phase III second-line study, pemetrexed was non-inferior to docetaxel for OS (8.3 versus 7.9 months, HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.8-1.2) and had a better toxicity profile with lower neutropaenia, alopecia and gastrointestinal adverse events.
“A phase III second-line study demonstrated non-inferiority for OS between pemetrexed and docetaxel (8.3 versus 7.9 months, HR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.8-1.2).However, pemetrexed showed a better toxicity profile with a significantly lower rate of neutropaenia and alopaecia as well as lower rates of gastrointestinal AEs [86].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThree studies using bevacizumab or anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies given with chemotherapy and continued as monotherapy until progression showed survival benefits, but the specific contribution of the maintenance phase cannot be determined.
“three studies, one employing bevacizumab and the other two using monoclonal antibodies against EGFR (cetuximab or necitumumab) administered concomitantly to chemotherapy and further continued as monotherapy until disease progression, have demonstrated survival benefits, but the specific role of the maintenance phase cannot be appreciated in this context [52,58,84].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [52]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [58] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [84]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNivolumab was better tolerated than docetaxel, with 85% versus 69% receiving at least 90% of planned dose intensity and treatment discontinuation rates of 10% versus 3%.
“In the phase III trial, nivolumab was better tolerated than docetaxel, with 85% of nivolumab patients receiving at least 90% of their planned dose intensity, compared with 69% of docetaxel patients, together with a treatment discontinuation rate of 10% versus 3% of the patients treated with nivolumab and docetaxel, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [97]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [98] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premiseown dataAn exploratory retrospective analysis in CheckMate-057 found an association between nivolumab efficacy and tumour membrane PD-L1 expression, but the analysis was limited by its retrospective and unplanned nature.
“An exploratory retrospective analysis revealed an association of efficacy by nivolumab and the level of tumour membrane expression of PD-L1.However, this analysis is limited by the retrospective and unplanned nature of this biomarker assessment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn 795 advanced SCC patients, afatinib improved PFS versus erlotinib (median 2.4 versus 1.9 months, HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-1.00, P=0.0427) and OS (median 7.9 versus 6.8 months, HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.95, P=0.0077).
“Afatinib versus erlotinib was tested in a phase III trial on 795 advanced SCC patients.PFS at the primary analysis was significantly longer with afatinib than with erlotinib, with a median of 2.4 months (95% CI: 1.9-2.9)versus 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.9-2.2);HR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68-1.00,P = 0.0427.OS was a median of 7.9 months (95% CI: 7.2-8.7)versus 6.8 months (95% CI: 5.9-7.8);HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.69-0”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [101] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUpdated follow-up of CheckMate 017 reported 18-month OS of 28% versus 13% and 18-month PFS of 17% versus 2.7% for nivolumab versus docetaxel.
“An updated follow-up reported an 18-month OS of 28% and 13% in the nivolumab and docetaxel arms, respectively, and an 18-month PFS equal to 17% for nivolumab and to 2.7% for docetaxel [99].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [99]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premiseown dataIn CheckMate-057, response rate (19% versus 12%, P=0.021) and duration of response (17.2 versus 5.6 months) favoured nivolumab, while PFS did not differ significantly (median 2.3 versus 4.2 months, HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.77-1.1).
“In addition, RR (19% versus 12%, P = 0.021) and duration of response (17.2 versus 5.6 months) were in favour of nivolumab, while no significant difference has been reported for PFS (median PFS 2.3 versus 4.2 months, HR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.77-1.1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn stage IV NSCLC after platinum-based chemotherapy, docetaxel plus ramucirumab improved median OS (10.5 versus 9.1 months, HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.98, P=0.023) and median PFS compared with docetaxel plus placebo.
“The study compared docetaxel with ramucirumab or placebo in patients who had progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy.Median OS was longer (10.5 versus 9.1 months, HR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75-0.98,P = 0.023) in the ramucirumab arm compared with the placebo arm.Median PFS was also superior in the ramucirumab arm”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [94] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn 222 EGFR wild-type NSCLC patients, second-line docetaxel was superior to erlotinib for PFS and OS, but only using an unplanned adjusted HR for the primary end-point analysis.
“In a randomised trial including 222 EGFR WT NSCLC patients, initially designed to assess selected biomarkers, second-line therapy with docetaxel was shown to be superior to erlotinib with respect to PFS, as well as to OS, but only using an unplanned adjusted HR for primary end-point analysis [91].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [91]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSeveral studies have consistently shown that EGFR TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib) produce higher response rates, longer PFS and improved quality of life compared with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in PS 0-2 patients whose tumours have an activating EGFR mutation.
“Several studies have consistently demonstrated that the EGFR TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib) produce higher RRs, longer PFS and improve QoL compared with standard platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in patients with good PS (PS 0-2), whose tumour harbours an activating (sensitising) EGFR mutation [105-112].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 8 sources checked- cites [105] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [106] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [107] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [108] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [109] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [110] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [111] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [112] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA meta-analysis of six randomised controlled trials with 990 EGFR wild-type patients found PFS significantly inferior in the EGFR TKI group versus chemotherapy (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.20-1.56, P<0.00001), with no OS difference (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.87-1.20, P=0.81).
“Similar results have been reported in a meta-analysis carried out on six randomised, controlled trials with a total of 990 patients with WT EGFR.Results indicated that, in the secondline treatment of EGFR WT-advanced NSCLC, PFS was significantly inferior in the EGFR TKI group versus the chemotherapy group (HR 1.37, 95% CI: 1.20-1.56,P < 0.00001).However, this did not translate into an OS differenc”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [93]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn CheckMate 017, median OS was 9.2 months with nivolumab versus 6.0 months with docetaxel, with a 41% reduction in risk of death (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.44-0.49, P<0.001).
“At the data cut-off, median OS was 9.2 months (95% CI: 7.3-13.3months) on nivolumab compared with 6.0 months (95% CI: 5.1-7.3months) on docetaxel, with a 41% reduction in the risk of death in the nivolumab arm (HR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.44-0.49;P < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [97]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [98] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA phase III study of maintenance bevacizumab with or without pemetrexed after first-line bevacizumab, cisplatin and pemetrexed showed a PFS benefit for the pemetrexed-bevacizumab combination but no OS improvement.
“Another phase III study comparing maintenance bevacizumab, with or without pemetrexed, after first-line induction with bevacizumab, cisplatin and pemetrexed showed a benefit in PFS for the pemetrexed-bevacizumab combination but no improvement in OS [82]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [82]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe nivolumab arm showed a positive impact on quality of life and a longer time to symptom deterioration compared with docetaxel.
“The experimental arm also showed a positive impact on QoL and a longer time to symptom deterioration compared with the standard arm [100].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [100]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn that trial, erlotinib plus bevacizumab produced no new safety signals; any-grade adverse events and serious adverse events were similar between arms, but grade 3 or worse adverse events were more frequent with the combination and 41% discontinued bevacizumab due to adverse events, mostly non-serious and reversible.
“No new safety signals were identified with the combination treatment, and the incidence of AEs (any grade) and SAEs were similar between the treatment arms.There was a higher frequency of grade 3 or worse AEs with the combination and a relatively high incidence of bevacizumab discontinuation due to AEs (41%); however, most of these AEs were non-serious and reversible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [116] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn CheckMate-057, nivolumab significantly prolonged OS versus docetaxel in 582 pretreated NSCC patients (median 12.2 versus 9.4 months, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.89, P=0.002), with a small excess of early progression or death events.
“Nivolumab led to a significant prolongation of OS compared with docetaxel in 582 pretreated patients with NSCC, who were recruited to the Checkmate-057 trial (median OS 12.2 versus 9.4 months, HR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.59-0.89;P = 0.002), although a small excess of early progression and/or death events were observed for nivolumab, compared with docetaxel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn NSCC second- or third-line treatment, paclitaxel-bevacizumab improved median PFS versus docetaxel (5.4 versus 3.9 months, HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.86, P=0.005) but showed no median OS difference (9.9 versus 10.8 months, HR 1.15, P=0.49).
“The study compared the association of paclitaxel-bevacizumab versus docetaxel in second-third line of treatment; median PFS was longer (5.4 versus 3.9 months, HR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.44-0-86, P = 0.005) in the paclitaxel-bevacizumab arm compared with docetaxel.No difference in median OS was observed (9.9 versus 10.8 months, HR 1.15, P = 0.49) [95].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [95]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationComparable second-line options include pemetrexed for non-squamous cell carcinoma only, or docetaxel.
“Comparable options in the second line consist of pemetrexed (for NSCC only) [86] or docetaxel [I, B] [87].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [86] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [87]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn LUX-LUNG 7, afatinib produced a modestly higher response rate and longer PFS than gefitinib as first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC with common activating EGFR mutations (del19 or L858R): 11 versus 10.9 months, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57-0.95, P=0.0165.
“The recently presented phase IIb study LUX-LUNG 7 showed that afatinib achieves a modestly higher RR and a longer PFS [11 versus 10.9 months, HR (95% CI): 0.73 (0.57-0.95);P = 0.0165] than gefitinib as first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC with common activating mutations (del19 or L858R) [II, B].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [114] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationALK-positive patients often have brain progression while on crizotinib because the cerebrospinal fluid concentration of crizotinib is very low.
“ALK-positive patients often have brain progression while on crizotinib, as the CSF concentration of the latter is very low [138].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [138]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a phase II trial, alectinib at crizotinib resistance showed activity against brain metastases, with ORR 57% in measurable lesions, complete response in 20%, and CNS disease control rate 83% in all 84 patients with baseline CNS metastases.
“In a phase II trial, alectinib at crizotinib resistance has demonstrated activity for brain metastases, with an ORR of 57% in patients with measurable lesions and complete response observed in 20% of patients [140].A CNS DCR of 83% was reported in all 84 patients with baseline CNS metastases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [140]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhen rebiopsy is not feasible or T790M is not detected, platinum-based chemotherapy alone is standard, and no data support continuing the EGFR TKI with platinum-based chemotherapy.
“At the present time, when rebiopsy is not feasible or when the EGFR T790M mutation is not detected as a resistance mechanism, the standard of care is represented by platinum-based chemotherapy alone.There is no data to support continuation of the EGFR TKI with platinum-based chemotherapy [I, A] [125].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [125] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRebiopsy after EGFR TKI progression can influence the next therapeutic step or reveal alternative resistance mechanisms such as SCLC transformation or bypass tracks.
“Patients who progress after an EGFR TKI should undergo a rebiopsy to perform molecular analysis specifically looking for EGFR T790M mutation.This approach could influence the next therapeutic step or reveal alternative EGFR TKI resistance mechanisms such as transformation to SCLC or bypass tracks that could potentially be addressed in clinical trials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn patients with EGFR mutation and brain metastases, afatinib produced a PFS improvement similar to that in patients without brain metastases, and PFS was significantly better with afatinib than chemotherapy (8.2 versus 5.4 months, HR 0.50, P=0.0297).
“In patients with EGFR mutation and brain metastases, the PFS improvement with the irreversible inhibitor afatinib was similar to that observed in patients without brain metastases [159].The PFS was significantly better with afatinib versus chemotherapy (8.2 versus 5.4 months; HR 0.50; P = 0.0297).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [159] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwo phase I studies, including ASCEND-1, showed significant ceritinib activity in ALK-rearranged NSCLC with crizotinib resistance, with ORR 56% and PFS 6.9 months, including intracranial responses in patients with brain metastasis.
“Two phase I studies, including the multicentre open-label ASCEND-1 study, showed a significant activity of ceritinib, based on an ORR of 56% and 6.9 months of PFS in patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC with crizotinib resistance [139].The benefit also included intracranial responses in patients with brain metastasis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [139]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationA Japanese observational study of 1194 patients with 1-10 newly diagnosed brain metastases treated with SRS found median OS of 13.9 months for a single metastasis, 10.8 months for 2-4 tumours, and 10.8 months for 5-10 tumours, with similar OS for 2-4 and 5-10 tumours.
“The observational study enrolled 1194 eligible patients with 1-10 newly diagnosed brain metastases in a 3-year period, with the largest tumour <10 ml in volume and <3 cm in longest diameter; total cumulative volume ≤15 ml, and a KPS score of 70 or higher, with all patients undergoing standard SRS [152].Median OS after SRS was 13.9 months (95% CI: 12.0-15.6)in the 455 patients with a single met”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [152]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationA phase III head-to-head trial in untreated ALK-positive advanced NSCLC showed alectinib 300 mg b.i.d. was superior to crizotinib 250 mg b.i.d. for PFS, with HR 0.34 (99.6826% CI 0.17-0.70, P<0.0001); median PFS was not reached with alectinib versus 10.2 months with crizotinib.
“Furthermore, alectinib was tested in a phase III head-to-head trial comparing this molecule (300 mg b.i.d.) with crizotinib (250 mg b.i.d.) in untreated ALK-positive advanced NSCLC patients, demonstrating the superiority of alectinib as an initial targeted treatment [142].Two hundred and seven patients were enrolled, when an independent data monitoring committee recommended the release of study”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [142]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCrizotinib improved symptoms and quality of life compared with pemetrexed and docetaxel.
“Crizotinib also showed an advantage over both pemetrexed and docetaxel with regards to the improvement in symptoms and QoL [136].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [136]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCrizotinib anti-tumour activity was initially shown in two multicentre single-arm studies, with significant ORR and PFS advantages and a survival advantage compared with other treatment options.
“The anti-tumour activity of crizotinib, a dual ALK and MET TKI, was initially demonstrated in two multicentre single-arm studies, with significant ORR and PFS advantages [133] as well as a survival advantage compared with other treatment options [134].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [133]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [134]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe QUARTZ trial found no difference between best supportive care plus whole brain radiotherapy and best supportive care alone in symptom relief, steroid use, OS, quality of life, or quality-adjusted life years, but full publication is awaited.
“This trial (QUARTZ) demonstrated no difference between the treatment arms regarding the relief of symptoms, steroid use, OS, QoL or quality-adjusted life years, but full publication is awaited [154].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [154]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDenosumab is not inferior to zoledronic acid and shows a trend towards superiority for skeletal-related event prevention in lung cancer.
“Denosumab is not inferior to [I, B] and shows a trend towards superiority to zoledronic acid in lung cancer in terms of SRE prevention [II,B] [161].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [161]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn an individual patient data meta-analysis of three phase III trials, age significantly influenced survival (P=0.04), with SRS alone favoured in patients aged 50 or younger and no significant survival differences in those older than 50; age also significantly affected brain failure outside the radiation field (P=0.043), with similar failure rates in both arms for patients 50 or younger and riskre
“The age of the patient significantly influenced survival (P = 0.04), with SRS alone favoured in patients aged 50 or younger, and with no significant survival differences in patients aged >50.Patient age was also a significant factor for brain failure outside of the radiation field(s) (P = 0.043), with similar failure rates in both arms for patients ≤50 years of age, while the risk was reduced with”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [153]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwo phase II studies of alectinib showed response rates between 45% and 50% and PFS of 8.9 months, and alectinib was also effective for brain metastases.
“Two phase II studies have also demonstrated RR between 45% and 50% and PFS of 8.9 months [140, 141].Alectinib was also effective for brain metastases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [140]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [141]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA randomised trial showed that introducing specialised palliative care early after diagnosis of stage IV disease improved quality of life and mood, reduced aggressive treatment, and improved median OS.
“A randomised trial evaluating the impact of introducing specialised palliative care early after diagnosis of stage IV disease on patient QoL in ambulatory patients was able to show an improvement in QoL and mood, a reduction in aggressive treatment and an improvement in median OS [147].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [147]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe most frequent whole brain radiotherapy schedules are 20 Gy in 5 fractions or 30 Gy in 10 fractions, with no difference in outcome.
“The WBRT most frequent schedules are 20 Gy in 5 fractions or 30 Gy in 10 fractions, with no difference in outcome [I, A] [155].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [155]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost patients progress after 9-12 months of EGFR TKI treatment, and multiple mechanisms of acquired resistance to first-generation EGFR TKIs have been described.
“The majority of patients will progress after 9-12 months of treatment with an EGFR TKI, and various mechanisms of acquired resistance to first-generation EGFR TKIs have been described [118].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [118] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPROFILE 1014 showed that first-line crizotinib improved PFS versus cisplatin-pemetrexed in ALK-positive advanced NSCC (10.9 versus 7.0 months, HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.35-0.60, P<0.001) and increased ORR (74% versus 45%, P<0.001), with median OS not reached in either group.
“Subsequently, the phase III study PROFILE 1014 compared crizotinib with cisplatin-pemetrexed without maintenance pemetrexed as first-line treatment in ALK-positive advanced NSCC [137], and demonstrated a significantly longer PFS (median of 10.9 versus 7.0 months; HR for progression or death with crizotinib 0.45; 95% CI: 0.35-0.60;P < 0.001) and higher ORR with crizotinib compared with chemotherapy”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [137] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPROFILE 1007 confirmed that crizotinib is superior to chemotherapy (pemetrexed or docetaxel) as second-line treatment, with better ORR and PFS.
“The phase III PROFILE 1007 study confirmed the benefit of crizotinib over chemotherapy, pemetrexed or docetaxel (investigator's choice), as second-line treatment with better ORR and PFS [135].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [135]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLiquid biopsy is a validated alternative to tissue rebiopsy, provides a surrogate source of DNA, and is a new strategy for tumour genotyping mainly at progression in EGFR-mutated patients.
“A valid alternative to tissue rebiopsy is represented by liquid biopsy, which has been validated [126], represents a surrogate source of DNA and is a new strategy for tumour genotyping, mainly at the time of progression for EGFR-mutated patients [III, A] [127-129].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCrizotinib penetration into cerebrospinal fluid is negligible, which is relevant because ALK-rearranged NSCLC has a high propensity to metastasise to the brain.
“Furthermore, crizotinib penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is negligible, and this pharmacological limitation is extremely relevant in treatment decisions, taking into account the high propensity of ALK-rearranged NSCLC to metastasise to the brain [138].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [138]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe T790M mutation substitutes methionine for threonine at position 790, increases affinity for ATP, and causes resistance to reversible EGFR TKIs such as gefitinib and erlotinib.
“This mutation leads to the substitution of threonine by methionine at position 790, which encodes part of the kinase domain of the receptor and results in increased affinity for ATP, causing resistance to competitive inhibition by reversible EGFR TKIs such as gefitinib and erlotinib [121,122].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [121] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [122]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe methodology of trials included in that systematic review was poor; only two randomised trials were eligible, and neither compared radionuclide treatment with placebo or best standard of care.
“However, the methodology in the included trials was poor; only two randomised trials were eligible, and neither compared radionuclide treatments with placebo or best standard of care.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [164]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenUngraded statements were considered justified standard clinical practice by the experts and the ESMO faculty.
“Statements without grading were considered justified standard clinical practice by the experts and the ESMO faculty.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDenosumab is not inferior to zoledronic acid and shows a trend toward superiority to zoledronic acid for SRE prevention in lung cancer.
“Denosumab is not inferior to [I, B] and shows a trend towards superiority to zoledronic acid in lung cancer in terms of SRE prevention [II, B].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [I, B]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [II, B]
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPemetrexed (for non-squamous NSCLC only) and docetaxel are comparable options as second-line therapy.
“Comparable options as second-line therapy consist of pemetrexed-for NSCC only-or docetaxel [I, B].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [I, B]
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe IASLC review concluded that few features definitively distinguish a second primary lung tumour from a metastasis in patients with more than one pulmonary cancer site; many commonly used factors are suggestive but carry substantial misclassification risk because most second primary lung tumours share the same histology.
“This review concluded that few features are definitive, with many commonly used factors being suggestive, but carry a substantial risk of misclassification as the majority of second primary lung tumours are of the same histology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [168]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn that review, overall survival was predicted by synchronous versus metachronous metastases (P<0.001), N-stage (P=0.002), and adenocarcinoma histology (P=0.036).
“Predictive factors for OS were synchronous versus metachronous metastases (P < 0.001), N-stage (P = 0.002) and adenocarcinoma histology (P = 0.036).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [167]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn that review, surgery was the most common treatment for both primary tumours (n=635, 83.9%) and metastases (n=339, 62.3%).
“Surgery was the most common treatment modality for both primary (n = 635, 83.9%) and metastases (n = 339, 62.3%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [167]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThese clinical practice guidelines were developed according to ESMO standard operating procedures for clinical practice guideline development.
“Theseclinicalpracticeguidelinesweredeveloped in accordance with the ESMO standard operating procedures for clinical practice guidelines development”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenLevels of evidence and grades of recommendation were applied using the system shown in Table 6.
“Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation have been applied using the system shown in Table6.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn that review, the median age at diagnosis was 61 years, 98% had good performance status, and two-thirds had early-stage intrathoracic disease staged IA-IIB after metastatic disease was excluded.
“These patients had a median age at diagnosis of 61 years, 98% had a good PS and two-thirds of patients had early-stage intrathoracic disease staged IA-IIB (after excluding metastatic disease).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [167]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationESMO-MCBS v1.0 was used to calculate scores for new therapies or indications approved by the EMA since 1 January 2016.
“ESMO-MCBS v1.0[181]was used to calculate scores for new therapies/indications approved by the EMA since 1 January 2016.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [181] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA systematic review of radionuclide treatment in lung cancer found pain relief in 75% of patients in eligible trials, with onset within 1-5 weeks and lasting up to 6 months.
“A systematic review analysed the use of radionuclide treatment in lung cancer and in the eligible trials, pain relief was reported in 75% of the patients having the onset of pain relief within 1-5 weeks after treatment, lasting up to 6 months [164].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [164]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn that review, RPA identified a low-risk group with metachronous metastases and 5-year OS of 48%, an intermediate-risk group with synchronous metastases and N0 disease and 5-year OS of 36%, and a high-risk group with synchronous metastases and intrathoracic N1/N2 disease and 5-year OS of 14%.
“RPA for risk groups identified a good prognosis (low-risk) group presenting with metachronous metastases (5-year OS of 48%), an intermediate-risk group presenting with synchronous metastases and N0 disease (5-year OS of 36%) and, finally, a high-risk group presenting with synchronous metastases and intrathoracic N1/N2 disease (5-year OS of 14%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [167]
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSolitary lesions in the contralateral lung should usually be considered synchronous secondary primary tumours.
“Solitary lesions in the contralateral lung should, in most cases, be considered as synchronous secondary primary tumours and, if possible, treated with radical intent [IV, B].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [IV, B]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn PD-L1-negative tumours, nivolumab and docetaxel produced similar overall survival results, with a more favourable toxicity profile for nivolumab.
“In PD-L1-negative tumours, nivolumab and docetaxel showed similar results, with a more favourable toxicity profile for nivolumab [II, A].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [II, A]
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
EGFR mutations are found in approximately 10-12% of Caucasians with adenocarcinoma and are more frequent in never smokers, females, and patients of East Asian ethnicity.
“EGFR mutations are found in ∼10%-12% of Caucasians with adenocarcinoma and are more frequent in never smokers, females and in patients of East Asian ethnicity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
ALK TKIs are effective therapies for ALK-rearranged NSCLC.
“ALK TKIs are effective therapies, and routine testing for ALK rearrangements is recommended in the same patient groups tested for EGFR mutations, principally those with NSCC [II, A].”
The paper relies on this without support.
IHC has a high positive and negative predictive value for ALK fusion.
“IHC has a high positive and negative predictive value for ALK fusion.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Meta-analyses show higher response rates for cisplatin combinations compared with carboplatin combinations.
“Meta-analyses have shown higher RRs for cisplatin combinations compared with carboplatin combinations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is associated with more gastrointestinal, neuro-, and nephrotoxicity, while bone marrow toxicity is more common with carboplatin.
“Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is associated with more gastrointestinal, neuro-and nephrotoxicity, while bone marrow toxicity is more common with carboplatin.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In patients with PS 2, chemotherapy compared with best supportive care prolongs survival and improves quality of life.
“In patients with PS 2, chemotherapy compared with BSC prolongs survival and improves QoL [I, B].”
The paper relies on this without support.
CGA can predict morbidity and mortality in elderly patients with cancer and can help adapt cancer management to each patient's fitness or frailty.
“CGA can predict morbidity and mortality in elderly patients with cancer and can help to adapt cancer management to each patient's fitness or frailty [III, C].”
The paper relies on this without support.
PET-CT scan may demonstrate unexpected metastases in 5%-10% of patients with presumed non-metastatic stage based on conventional imaging.
“Moreover, PET-CT scan may demonstrate unexpected metastases in 5%-10% of the patients with presumed non-metastatic stage based on conventional imaging.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Therapeutic decisions for NSCLC patients are dependent upon specific tumour histological subtype.
“Therapeutic decisions for NSCLC patients are dependent upon specific tumour histological subtype, and this should be given whenever possible.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Genetic alterations, which are key oncogenic events (driver mutations), have been identified in NSCLC, with EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements determining approved, selective pathway-directed systemic therapy.
“Genetic alterations, which are key oncogenic events (driver mutations), have been identified in NSCLC, with two of these-EGFR mutations and the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements-determining approved, selective pathwaydirected systemic therapy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Single-agent chemotherapy improves disease-related symptoms and overall survival in advanced NSCLC.
“Single agents improve disease-related symptoms and OS.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Lung cancer has historically been poorly immunogenic, with no established benefit from cytokine modulation or vaccines.
“Lung cancer has been historically considered poorly immunogenic, with no established benefit from cytokine modulation or vaccines.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Between 30% and 40% of patients with NSCLC develop bone metastases.
“Given the incidence of bone metastases in NSCLC (30%-40% of patients with NSCLC develop bone metastases), it may be reasonable to evaluate for bone disease upon disease diagnosis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Synchronous and metachronous oligometastatic disease may have different biological features and outcomes.
“The biology and prognosis related to synchronous and metachronous oligometastases may differ.”
The paper relies on this without support.
PET imaging has high sensitivity but low specificity.
“Follow-up with PET is not routinely recommended, due to its high sensitivity and relatively low specificity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Second-line treatment provides clear benefit to patients who initially responded to first-line chemotherapy and retain good performance status.
“Given the clear benefits of second-line therapy in patients who presented an initial response to first-line chemotherapy and maintain good PS, radiological follow-up should be considered every 6-12 weeks to allow for early initiation of second-line”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC, EGFR TKIs are standard first-line therapy.
“Among patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer with a mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard first-line therapy.1–4”
From Osimertinib or Platinum–Pemetrexed in <i>EGFR</i> T790M–Positive Lung Cancer (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Conflicting guidance on CNS imaging at diagnosis
MajorThe abstract restricts CNS imaging to patients with neurological symptoms or signs, but the radiology section recommends imaging at diagnosis when available, without that restriction.
“Imaging of CNS is reserved for patients with neurological symptoms or signs.”
“however, if available, imaging of the CNS with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, preferably with gadolinium enhancement) or CT brain with iodine contrast should be carried out at diagnosis.”
Conflicting PD-L1 threshold for pembrolizumab benefit score
MinorThe figure assigns a benefit score of 3 when PD-L1 expression is below 1%, while the treatment recommendation assigns that score when expression is above 1%. These thresholds identify opposing patient groups.
“pembrolizumab is another immunotherapy option in second-line but also in third-line therapy in patients with NSCC expressing PD-L1 [I, A; ESMO-MCBS v1.0 score: 3 if PD-L1 <1%; 5 if PD-L1 >50%].”
“Pembrolizumab at 2mg/kg every 3 weeks is recommended in pretreated patients with platinum-pretreated, advanced SCC or NSCC expressing PD-L1 [I, A; ESMO-MCBS v1.0 score: 3 if PD-L1 >1%; 5 if PD-L1 >50%].”
Different recommendation grades for single-agent chemotherapy in PS 2
MinorThe treatment algorithm gives single-agent chemotherapy a grade of A, whereas the accompanying PS 2 discussion gives the same alternative a grade of B.
“Single-agent chemotherapy (gemcitabine, vinorelbine or docetaxel) [I, A]”
“Single-agent chemotherapy with gemcitabine, vinorelbine and docetaxel represents an alternative treatment option [I, B] [69].”
Cites
Jemal, A., Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Ward, E., & Forman, D. (2011) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20107 · Cited by 54,708 · see citing works
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534 · see citing works
Global cancer statistics, 2012
Torre, L. A., Bray, F., Siegel, R. L., Ferlay, J., Lortet‐Tieulent, J., & Jemal, A. (2015) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21262 · Cited by 26,858 · see citing works
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., & Jemal, A. (2016) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21332 · Cited by 16,003 · see citing works
Lynch, T. J., Bell, D. W., Sordella, R., Gurubhagavatula, S., Okimoto, R. A., Brannigan, B. W., Harris, P. L., Haserlat, S. M., Supko, J. G., Haluska, F. G., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040938 · Cited by 11,486 · see citing works
<i>EGFR</i> Mutations in Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Response to Gefitinib Therapy
Paez, J. G., Jänne, P. A., Lee, J. C., Tracy, S., Greulich, H., Gabriel, S., Herman, P., Kaye, F. J., Lindeman, N., Boggon, T. J., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099314 · Cited by 9,368 · see citing works
Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer
Borghaei, H., Paz-Ares, L., Horn, L., Spigel, D. R., Steins, M., Ready, N. E., Chow, L. Q., Vokes, E. E., Felip, E., Holgado, E., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1507643 · Cited by 9,335 · see citing works
Self-citationNivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Brahmer, J., Reckamp, K. L., Baas, P., Crinò, L., Eberhardt, W. E. E., Poddubskaya, E., Antonia, S., Pluzanski, A., Vokes, E. E., Holgado, E., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1504627 · Cited by 8,447 · see citing works
Self-citationGefitinib or Carboplatin–Paclitaxel in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma
Mok, T. S., Wu, Y.-L., Thongprasert, S., Yang, C.-H., Chu, D.-T., Saijo, N., Sunpaweravong, P., Han, B., Margono, B., Ichinose, Y., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810699 · Cited by 8,261 · see citing works
Early Palliative Care for Patients with Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Temel, J. S., Greer, J. A., Muzikansky, A., Gallagher, E. R., Admane, S., Jackson, V. A., Dahlin, C. M., Blinderman, C. D., Jacobsen, J., Pirl, W. F., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1000678 · Cited by 7,482 · see citing works
Herbst, R. S., Baas, P., Kim, D.-W., Felip, E., Pérez-Gracia, J. L., Han, J.-Y., Molina, J., Kim, J.-H., Arvis, C. D., Ahn, M.-J., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01281-7 · Cited by 6,449 · see citing works
Cancer Incidence in Five Continents
(1966) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85849-9 · Cited by 5,936 · see citing works
Paclitaxel–Carboplatin Alone or with Bevacizumab for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Sandler, A., Gray, R., Perry, M. C., Brahmer, J., Schiller, J. H., Dowlati, A., Lilenbaum, R., & Johnson, D. H. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa061884 · Cited by 5,761 · see citing works
Gefitinib or Chemotherapy for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Mutated EGFR
Maemondo, M., Inoue, A., Kobayashi, K., Sugawara, S., Oizumi, S., Isobe, H., Gemma, A., Harada, M., Yoshizawa, H., Kinoshita, I., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0909530 · Cited by 5,525 · see citing works
Rosell, R., Carcereny, E., Gervais, R., Vergnenegre, A., Massuti, B., Felip, E., Palmero, R., Garcia-Gomez, R., Pallares, C., Sanchez, J. M., et al. (2012) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70393-x · Cited by 5,489 · see citing works
Erlotinib in Previously Treated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Shepherd, F. A., Rodrigues Pereira, J., Ciuleanu, T., Tan, E. H., Hirsh, V., Thongprasert, S., Campos, D., Maoleekoonpiroj, S., Smylie, M., Martins, R., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa050753 · Cited by 5,419 · see citing works
Comparison of Four Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Schiller, J. H., Harrington, D., Belani, C. P., Langer, C., Sandler, A., Krook, J., Zhu, J., & Johnson, D. H. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa011954 · Cited by 4,955 · see citing works
Goldstraw, P. G., Chansky, K., Crowley, J. J., Rami–Porta, R., Asamura, H., Eberhardt, W., Nicholson, A. G., Groome, P. A., Mitchell, A., Bolejack, V., et al. (2016) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2015.09.009 · Cited by 4,616 · see citing works
Self-citationAnaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibition in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Kwak, E. L., Bang, Y., Camidge, D. R., Shaw, A. T., Solomon, B., Maki, R. G., Ou, S. I., Dezube, B. J., Janne, P. A., Costa, D. B., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1006448 · Cited by 4,442 · see citing works
Mitsudomi, T., Morita, S., Yatabe, Y., Negoro, S., Okamoto, I., Tsurutani, J., Seto, T., Satouchi, M., Tada, H., Hirashima, T., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70364-x · Cited by 4,090 · see citing works
Pao, W., Miller, V. A., Politi, K. A., Riely, G. J., Somwar, R., Zakowski, M. F., Kris, M. G., & Varmus, H. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020073 · Cited by 3,527 · see citing works
Genotypic and Histological Evolution of Lung Cancers Acquiring Resistance to EGFR Inhibitors
Sequist, L. V., Waltman, B. A., Dias-Santagata, D., Digumarthy, S., Turke, A. B., Fidias, P., Bergethon, K., Shaw, A. T., Gettinger, S., Cosper, A. K., et al. (2011) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3002003 · Cited by 3,499 · see citing works
Crizotinib versus Chemotherapy in Advanced <i>ALK</i> -Positive Lung Cancer
Shaw, A. T., Kim, D.-W., Nakagawa, K., Seto, T., Crinó, L., Ahn, M.-J., De Pas, T., Besse, B., Solomon, B. J., Blackhall, F., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1214886 · Cited by 3,381 · see citing works
Sequist, L. V., Yang, J. C.-H., Yamamoto, N., O'Byrne, K., Hirsh, V., Mok, T., Geater, S. L., Orlov, S., Tsai, C.-M., Boyer, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.44.2806 · Cited by 3,228 · see citing works
Scagliotti, G. V., Parikh, P., von Pawel, J., Biesma, B., Vansteenkiste, J., Manegold, C., Serwatowski, P., Gatzemeier, U., Digumarti, R., Zukin, M., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.15.0375 · Cited by 3,203 · see citing works
Self-citationFirst-Line Crizotinib versus Chemotherapy in <i>ALK</i> -Positive Lung Cancer
Solomon, B. J., Mok, T., Kim, D.-W., Wu, Y.-L., Nakagawa, K., Mekhail, T., Felip, E., Cappuzzo, F., Paolini, J., Usari, T., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1408440 · Cited by 3,190 · see citing works
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative Group (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7010.899 · Cited by 3,039 · see citing works
Hellman, S., & Weichselbaum, R. R. (1995) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1995.13.1.8 · Cited by 2,562 · see citing works
Yu, H. A., Arcila, M. E., Rekhtman, N., Sima, C. S., Zakowski, M. F., Pao, W., Kris, M. G., Miller, V. A., Ladanyi, M., & Riely, G. J. (2013) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-2246 · Cited by 2,454 · see citing works
Hanna, N., Shepherd, F. A., Fossella, F. V., Pereira, J. R., De Marinis, F., von Pawel, J., Gatzemeier, U., Tsao, T. C. Y., Pless, M., Muller, T., et al. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.08.163 · Cited by 2,426 · see citing works
Andrews, D. W., Scott, C., Sperduto, P. W., Flanders, A. E., Gaspar, L. E., Schell, M. C., Werner‐Wasik, M., Demas, W. F., Ryu, J. K., Bahary, J.-P., et al. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16250-8 · Cited by 2,418 · see citing works
Shepherd, F. A., Dancey, J. E., Ramlau, R., Mattson, K. V., Gralla, R. J., O’Rourke, M. A., Levitan, N. I., Gressot, L., Vincent, M. D., Burkes, R. L., et al. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2000.18.10.2095 · Cited by 2,178 · see citing works
Frampton, G. M., Fichtenholtz, A., Otto, G. A., Wang, K., Downing, S. R., He, J., Schnall-Levin, M., White, J., Sanford, E. M., An, P., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2696 · Cited by 2,157 · see citing works
The T790M mutation in EGFR kinase causes drug resistance by increasing the affinity for ATP
Yun, C.-H., Mengwasser, K. E., Toms, A. V., Woo, M. S., Greulich, H., Wong, K.-K., Meyerson, M., & Eck, M. J. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0709662105 · Cited by 2,118 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This mutation leads to the substitution of threonine by methionine at position 790, which encodes part of the kinase domain of the receptor and results in increased affinity for ATP, causing resistance to competitive inhibition by reversible EGFR TKIs such as gefitinib and erlotinib [121, 122].”
BackgroundAZD9291 in EGFR Inhibitor–Resistant Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Jänne, P. A., Yang, J. C.-H., Kim, D.-W., Planchard, D., Ohe, Y., Ramalingam, S. S., Ahn, M.-J., Kim, S.-W., Su, W.-C., Horn, L., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1411817 · Cited by 2,116 · see citing works
Wu, Y.-L., Zhou, C., Hu, C.-P., Feng, J., Lu, S., Huang, Y., Li, W., Hou, M., Shi, J. H., Lee, K. Y., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70604-1 · Cited by 1,978 · see citing works
Clinical Features and Outcome of Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Who Harbor EML4-ALK
Shaw, A. T., Yeap, B. Y., Mino-Kenudson, M. A., Digumarthy, S. R., Costa, D. B., Heist, R. S., Solomon, B., Stubbs, H., Admane, S., McDermott, U., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.22.6993 · Cited by 1,873 · see citing works
Yang, J. C.-H., Wu, Y.-L., Schuler, M., Sebastian, M., Popat, S., Yamamoto, N., Zhou, C., Hu, C.-P., O'Byrne, K., Feng, J., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(14)71173-8 · Cited by 1,574 · cited 1× · see citing works
“0374), whereas this improvement was not observed in patients with EGFR L858R mutations [II, A] [115].”
BackgroundSelf-citationReck, M., von Pawel, J., Zatloukal, P., Ramlau, R., Gorbounova, V. A., Hirsh, V., Leighl, N. B., Mezger, J. M., Archer, V. R., Moore, N., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.14.5466 · Cited by 1,500 · see citing works
Self-citationYamamoto, M., Serizawa, T., Shuto, T., Akabane, A., Higuchi, Y., Kawagishi, J., Yamanaka, K., Sato, Y., Jokura, H., Yomo, S., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70061-0 · Cited by 1,447 · see citing works
Sperduto, P. W., Kased, N., Roberge, D., Xu, Z., Shanley, R., Luo, X., Sneed, P. K., Chao, S. T., Weil, R. J., Suh, J., et al. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.38.0527 · Cited by 1,425 · see citing works
Rizvi, N. A., Mazières, J., Planchard, D., Stinchcombe, T. E., Dy, G. K., Antonia, S. J., Horn, L., Lena, H., Minenza, E., Mennecier, B., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)70054-9 · Cited by 1,415 · see citing works
Pirker, R., Pereira, J. R., Szczęsna, A., von Pawel, J., Krzakowski, M. J., Ramlau, R., Vynnychenko, I. O., Park, K., Yu, C.-T., Ganul, V., et al. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60569-9 · Cited by 1,346 · see citing works
Garon, E. B., Ciuleanu, T.-E., Arrieta, O., Prabhash, K., Syrigos, K. N., Goksel, T., Park, K., Gorbunova, V., Kowalyszyn, R. D., Pikiel, J., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60845-x · Cited by 1,309 · see citing works
Self-citationLindeman, N. I., Cagle, P. T., Beasley, M. B., Chitale, D. A., Dacic, S., Giaccone, G., Jenkins, R. B., Kwiatkowski, D. J., Saldivar, J.-S., Squire, J., et al. (2013) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1097/jto.0b013e318290868f · Cited by 1,280 · see citing works
Hung, R. J., McKay, J. D., Gaborieau, V., Boffetta, P., Hashibe, M., Zaridze, D., Mukeria, A., Szeszenia-Dabrowska, N., Lissowska, J., Rudnai, P., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06885 · Cited by 1,275 · see citing works
Camidge, D. R., Bang, Y., Kwak, E. L., Iafrate, A. J., Varella‐Garcia, M., Fox, S. B., Riely, G. J., Solomon, B., Ou, S. I., Kim, D., et al. (2012) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70344-3 · Cited by 1,271 · see citing works
Henry, D. H., Costa, L., Goldwasser, F., Hirsh, V., Hungria, V., Prausová, J., Scagliotti, G. V., Sleeboom, H. P., Spencer, A. G., Vadhan‐Raj, S., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2010.31.3304 · Cited by 1,265 · see citing works
Cappuzzo, F., Ciuleanu, T., Stelmakh, L., Cicenas, S., Szczésna, A., Juhász, E., Esteban, E., Molinier, O., Brugger, W., Melezínek, I., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70112-1 · Cited by 1,186 · see citing works
Park, K., Tan, E.-H., O'Byrne, K., Zhang, L., Boyer, M., Mok, T., Hirsh, V., Yang, J. C.-H., Lee, K. H., Lu, S., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30033-x · Cited by 1,183 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Data on OS (co-primary end point) are still immature and data on QoL have not been presented [114].”
BackgroundCiuleanu, T., Brodowicz, T., Zielinski, C., Kim, J. H., Krzakowski, M., Laack, E., Wu, Y.-L., Bover, I., Begbie, S., Tzekova, V., et al. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61497-5 · Cited by 1,111 · see citing works
Barlési, F., Mazières, J., Merlio, J., Debieuvre, D., Mosser, J., Léna, H., Ouafik, L., Besse, B., Rouquette, I., Westeel, V., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00004-0 · Cited by 1,003 · see citing works
Reck, M., Kaiser, R., Mellemgaard, A., Douillard, J.-Y., Orlov, S., Krzakowski, M., von Pawel, J., Gottfried, M., Bondarenko, I., Liao, M., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70586-2 · Cited by 951 · see citing works
Self-citationShaw, A. T., Yeap, B. Y., Solomon, B., Riely, G. J., Gainor, J. F., Engelman, J. A., Shapiro, G. I., Costa, D. B., Ou, S. I., Butaney, M., et al. (2011) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70232-7 · Cited by 897 · see citing works
Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older patients with cancer
Extermann, M., & Hurria, A. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.10.6559 · Cited by 875 · see citing works
Sequist, L. V., Martins, R. G., Spigel, D., Grunberg, S. M., Spira, A., Jänne, P. A., Joshi, V. A., McCollum, D., Evans, T. L., Muzikansky, A., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.14.8494 · Cited by 820 · see citing works
Cherny, N. I., Sullivan, R., Dafni, U., Kerst, J. M., Sobrero, A., Zielinski, C., de Vries, E. G. E., & Piccart, M. J. (2015) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv249 · Cited by 818 · see citing works
Gridelli, C., Perrone, F., Gallo, C., Cigolari, S., Rossi, A., Piantedosi, F., Barbera, S., Ferrau, F., Piazza, E., Rosetti, F., et al. (2003) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/95.5.362 · Cited by 781 · see citing works
Self-citationSocinski, M. A., Bondarenko, I., Karaseva, N. A., Makhson, A. M., Vynnychenko, I. O., Okamoto, I., Hon, J. K., Hirsh, V., Bhar, P., Zhang, H., et al. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.39.5848 · Cited by 758 · see citing works
Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as tumor marker in lung cancer
Grunnet, M., & Sørensen, J. B. (2011) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.11.012 · Cited by 754 · see citing works
Seto, T., Kato, T., Nishio, M., Goto, K., Atagi, S., Hosomi, Y., Yamamoto, N., Hida, T., Maemondo, M., Nakagawa, K., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70381-x · Cited by 750 · see citing works
Han, J.-Y., Park, K., Kim, S.-W., Lee, D. H., Kim, H. Y., Kim, H. T., Ahn, M. J., Yun, T., Ahn, J. S., Suh, C., et al. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.36.8456 · Cited by 736 · see citing works
Scagliotti, G., Hanna, N., Fossella, F., Sugarman, K., Blatter, J., Peterson, P., Simms, L., & Shepherd, F. A. (2009) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0232 · Cited by 690 · see citing works
Weickhardt, A. J., Scheier, B., Burke, J. M., Gan, G., Lu, X., Bunn, P. A., Aisner, D. L., Gaspar, L. E., Kavanagh, B. D., Doebele, R. C., et al. (2012) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1097/jto.0b013e3182745948 · Cited by 684 · see citing works
Davies, H. E., Mishra, E. K., Kahan, B. C., Wrightson, J., Stanton, A. E., Guhan, A., Davies, C. W. H., Grayez, J., Harrison, R. N., Prasad, A., et al. (2012) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2012.5535 · Cited by 654 · see citing works
Shaw, A. T., Gandhi, L., Gadgeel, S., Riely, G. J., Cetnar, J., West, H., Camidge, D. R., Socinski, M. A., Chiappori, A., Mekhail, T., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00488-x · Cited by 638 · see citing works
Dykewicz, C. A. (2001) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/321805 · Cited by 637 · see citing works
Paz-Ares, L. G., de Marinis, F., Dediu, M., Thomas, M., Pujol, J.-L., Bidoli, P., Molinier, O., Sahoo, T. P., Laack, E., Reck, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.47.1102 · Cited by 624 · see citing works
Ardizzoni, A., Boni, L., Tiseo, M., Fossella, F. V., Schiller, J. H., Paesmans, M., Radosavljevic, D., Paccagnella, A., Zatloukal, P., Mazzanti, P., et al. (2007) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djk196 · Cited by 612 · see citing works
Paz-Ares, L., de Marinis, F., Dediu, M., Thomas, M., Pujol, J.-L., Bidoli, P., Molinier, O., Sahoo, T. P., Laack, E., Reck, M., et al. (2012) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70063-3 · Cited by 610 · see citing works
Self-citationNSCLC Meta-Analyses Collaborative Group (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.17.7162 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
CSF Concentration of the Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitor Crizotinib
Costa, D. B., Kobayashi, S. S., Pandya, S. S., Yeo, W.-L., Shen, Z., Tan, W., & Wilner, K. D. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2010.34.1313 · Cited by 601 · see citing works
Ou, S. I., Ahn, J. S., Petris, L. D., Govindan, R., Yang, J. C., Hughes, B. G. M., Léna, H., Moro‐Sibilot, D., Bearz, A., Viteri, S., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.63.9443 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
Phase III intergroup study of talc poudrage vs talc slurry sclerosis for malignant pleural effusion
Dresler, C. M., Olak, J., Herndon, J. E., Richards, W. G., Scalzetti, E., Fleishman, S. B., Kernstine, K. H., Demmy, T., Jablons, D. M., Kohman, L., et al. (2005) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.127.3.909 · Cited by 578 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The preferred sclerosing agent is talc, which is more effective than bleomycin or tetracycline [II, B] [144]; thoracoscopic insufflation with talc (poudrage) is more effective than talc slurry sclerosis [II, B] [145].”
BackgroundQuoix, E., Zalcman, G., Oster, J.-P., Westeel, V., Pichon, E., Lavolé, A., Dauba, J., Debieuvre, D., Souquet, P.-J., Bigay-Game, L., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60780-0 · Cited by 566 · see citing works
Common 5p15.33 and 6p21.33 variants influence lung cancer risk
Wang, Y., Broderick, P., Webb, E. L., Wu, X., Vijayakrishnan, J., Matakidou, A., Qureshi, M., Dong, Q., Gu, X., Chen, W. V., et al. (2008) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.273 · Cited by 552 · see citing works
Inoue, A., Kobayashi, K., Maemondo, M., Sugawara, S., Oizumi, S., Isobe, H., Gemma, A., Harada, M., Yoshizawa, H., Kinoshita, I., et al. (2013) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mds214 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Nishino, M., Giobbie-Hurder, A., Gargano, M., Suda, M., Ramaiya, N. H., & Hodi, F. S. (2013) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-0895 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Inoue, A., Kobayashi, K., Usui, K., Maemondo, M., Okinaga, S., Mikami, I., Ando, M., Yamazaki, K., Saijo, Y., Gemma, A., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.18.7658 · Cited by 505 · see citing works
Thatcher, N., Hirsch, F. R., Luft, A. V., Szczęsna, A., Ciuleanu, T., Dediu, M., Ramlau, R., Galiulin, R., Bálint, B., Losonczy, G., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00021-2 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Self-citationGarassino, M. C., Martelli, O., Broggini, M., Farina, G., Veronese, S., Rulli, E., Bianchi, F., Bettini, A., Longo, F., Moscetti, L., et al. (2013) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70310-3 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Kim, D.-W., Mehra, R., Tan, D. S. W., Felip, E., Chow, L. Q. M., Camidge, D. R., Vansteenkiste, J., Sharma, S., De Pas, T., Riely, G. J., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00614-2 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Self-citationAshworth, A. B., Senan, S., Palma, D. A., Riquet, M., Ahn, Y. C., Ricardi, U., Congedo, M. T., Gomez, D. R., Wright, G. M., Melloni, G., et al. (2014) · Clinical Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2014.04.003 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Self-citationSoria, J.-C., Felip, E., Cobo, M., Lu, S., Syrigos, K., Lee, K. H., Göker, E., Georgoulias, V., Li, W., Isla, D., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00006-6 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Sahgal, A., Aoyama, H., Köcher, M., Neupane, B., Collette, S., Tago, M., Shaw, P., Beyene, J., & Chang, E. L. (2015) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.10.024 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Soria, J.-C., Wu, Y.-L., Nakagawa, K., Kim, S.-W., Yang, J.-J., Ahn, M.-J., Wang, J., Yang, J. C.-H., Lu, Y., Atagi, S., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00121-7 · Cited by 413 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There is no data to support continuation of the EGFR TKI with platinum-based chemotherapy [I, A] [125].”
MethodDouillard, J.-Y., Ostoros, G., Cobo, M., Ciuleanu, T., McCormack, R., Webster, A., & Milenkova, T. (2014) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.721 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Corre, R., Greillier, L., Le Caër, H., Audigier-Valette, C., Baize, N., Bérard, H., Falchero, L., Monnet, I., Dansin, E., Vergnenègre, A., et al. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.63.5839 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Never-Smokers With Lung Cancer: Epidemiologic Evidence of a Distinct Disease Entity
Toh, C., Gao, F., Lim, W., Leong, S., Fong, K.-W., Yap, S., Hsu, A. A. L., Eng, P., Koong, H., Agasthian, T., et al. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.04.8033 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Ciuleanu, T., Stelmakh, L., Cicenas, S., Miliauskas, S., Grigorescu, A. C., Hillenbach, C., Johannsdottir, H. K., Klughammer, B., & Gonzalez, E. E. (2012) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70385-0 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Zhou, C., Wu, Y.-L. L. C., Chen, G., Liu, X., Zhu, Y., Lü, S., Feng, J., He, J., Han, B., Wang, J., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.59.4424 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Schuler, M., Wu, Y.-L., Hirsh, V., O’Byrne, K., Yamamoto, N., Mok, T., Popat, S., Sequist, L. V., Massey, D., Zazulina, V., et al. (2016) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2015.11.014 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Self-citationRekhtman, N., Paik, P. K., Arcila, M. E., Tafe, L. J., Oxnard, G. R., Moreira, A. L., Travis, W. D., Zakowski, M. F., Kris, M. G., & Ladanyi, M. (2012) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-2109 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Kudoh, S., Takeda, K., Nakagawa, K., Takada, M., Katakami, N., Matsui, K., Shinkai, T., Sawa, T., Goto, I., Semba, H., et al. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.06.1044 · Cited by 360 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Several phase III trials established single-agent therapy (docetaxel, vinorelbine or gemcitabine) as the standard of care for first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC patients aged ≥70 [69, 71].”
BackgroundDelbaldo, C., Michiels, S., Syz, N., Soria, J., Chevalier, T. L., & Pignon, J. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.292.4.470 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Scagliotti, G. V., Hirsh, V., Siena, S., Henry, D. H., Woll, P. J., Manegold, C., Solal-Celigny, P., Rodriguez, G., Krzakowski, M., Mehta, N. D., et al. (2012) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1097/jto.0b013e31826aec2b · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Barlesi, F., Scherpereel, A., Rittmeyer, A., Pazzola, A., Ferrer Tur, N., Kim, J.-H., Ahn, M.-J., Aerts, J. G. J. V., Gorbunova, V., Vikström, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.42.3749 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Soria, J.-C., Mauguen, A., Reck, M., Sandler, A. B., Saijo, N., Johnson, D. H., Burcoveanu, D., Fukuoka, M., Besse, B., & Pignon, J.-P. (2013) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mds590 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Kerr, K. M., Bubendorf, L., Edelman, M. J., Marchetti, A., Mok, T. S. K., Novello, S., O'Byrne, K. J., Stahel, R. A., Peters, S., Felip, E., et al. (2014) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu145 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Self-citationMalvezzi, M., Bertuccio, P., Rosso, T., Rota, M., Levi, F., Vecchia, C. L., & Negri, E. (2015) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv001 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Weber, J. S. (2007) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.12-7-864 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
De Ruysscher, D., Wanders, R., van Baardwijk, A., Dingemans, A.-M. C., Reymen, B., Houben, R., Bootsma, G., Pitz, C., van Eijsden, L., Geraedts, W., et al. (2012) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1097/jto.0b013e318262caf6 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
The oligometastatic state—separating truth from wishful thinking
Palma, D. A., Salama, J. K., Lo, S. S.-M., Senan, S., Treasure, T., Govindan, R., & Weichselbaum, R. R. (2014) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.96 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Self-citationDetterbeck, F. C., Franklin, W. A., Nicholson, A. G., Girard, N., Arenberg, D. A., Travis, W. D., Mazzone, P. J., Marom, E. M., Donington, J. S., Tanoue, L. T., et al. (2016) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2016.01.025 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Self-citationRobinet, G., Thomas, P. A., Breton, J.-L., Léna, H., Gouva, S., Dabouis, G., Bennouna, J., Souquet, P. J., Balmès, P., Thiberville, L., et al. (2001) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1023/a:1008338312647 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Kawaguchi, T., Ando, M., Asami, K., Okano, Y., Fukuda, M., Nakagawa, H., Ibata, H., Kozuki, T., Endo, T., Tamura, A., et al. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.52.4694 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Katayama, R., Lovly, C. M., & Shaw, A. T. (2015) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-2791 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Zukin, M., Barrios, C. H., Rodrigues Pereira, J., De Albuquerque Ribeiro, R., de Mendonça Beato, C. A., do Nascimento, Y. N., Murad, A., Franke, F. A., Precivale, M., de Lima Araujo, L. H., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.48.1911 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Park, K., Yu, C.-J., Kim, S.-W., Lin, M.-C., Sriuranpong, V., Tsai, C.-M., Lee, J.-S., Kang, J.-H., Chan, K. C. A., Perez-Moreno, P., et al. (2016) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.4921 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Henry, D., Vadhan-Raj, S., Hirsh, V., von Moos, R., Hungria, V., Costa, L., Woll, P. J., Scagliotti, G., Smith, G., Feng, A., et al. (2014) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-013-2022-1 · Cited by 183 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In the study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in patients with advanced cancers, the time extent to which pain interfered with daily life (used as surrogate for QoL) was longer in patients treated with denosumab and with no pain or mild pain interference at baseline [163].”
BackgroundMarchetti, A., Palma, J. F., Felicioni, L., De Pas, T. M., Chiari, R., Del Grammastro, M., Filice, G., Ludovini, V., Brandes, A., Chella, A., et al. (2015) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1097/jto.0000000000000643 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Di Maio, M., Chiodini, P., Georgoulias, V., Hatzidaki, D., Takeda, K., Wachters, F. M., Gebbia, V., Smit, E. F., Morabito, A., Gallo, C., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.17.5844 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Park, J. O., Kim, S., Ahn, J. S., Suh, C., Lee, J. S., Jang, J. S., Cho, E. K., Yang, S. H., Choi, J., Heo, D. S., et al. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.10.8134 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Barlesi, F., Scherpereel, A., Gorbunova, V., Gervais, R., Vikström, A., Chouaid, C., Chella, A., Kim, J. H., Ahn, M. J., Reck, M., et al. (2014) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu098 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Self-citationGridelli, C., Ardizzoni, A., Chevalier, T. L., Manegold, C., Perrone, F., Thatcher, N., van Zandwijk, N., Maïo, M. D., Martelli, O., & de Marinis, F. (2004) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdh087 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Darling, G. E., Maziak, D. E., Inculet, R., Gulenchyn, K. Y., Driedger, A. A., Ung, Y., Gu, C., Kuruvilla, M. S., Cline, K. J., Julian, J. A., et al. (2011) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1097/jto.0b013e318220c912 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Molecular mechanisms of resistance in epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant lung adenocarcinomas
Cortot, A. B., & Jänne, P. A. (2014) · European Respiratory Review · doi:10.1183/09059180.00004614 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Marchetti, A., Grammastro, M. D., Felicioni, L., Malatesta, S., Filice, G., Centi, I., Pas, T. M. D., Santoro, A., Chella, A., Brandes, A. A., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103883 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Hughes, A. N., O'Brien, M. E. R., Petty, W. J., Chick, J. B., Rankin, E., Woll, P. J., Dunlop, D., Nicolson, M., Boinpally, R., Wolf, J., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.19.3995 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Lee, J.-K., Hahn, S., Kim, D.-W., Suh, K. J., Keam, B., Kim, T. M., Lee, S.-H., & Heo, D. S. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.3314 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Paz-Ares, L., Mezger, J., Ciuleanu, T. E., Fischer, J. R., von Pawel, J., Provencio, M., Kazarnowicz, A., Losonczy, G., de Castro, G., Szczesna, A., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)70046-x · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Self-citationWu, Y., Li, P., Zhang, H., Shi, Y., Wu, H., Zhang, J., Qian, Y., Li, C., & Yang, J. (2013) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.27779 · Cited by 129 · cited 1× · see citing works
“PET/CT is the most sensitive modality in detecting bone metastasis [33].”
BackgroundBaşer, S., Shannon, V. R., Eapen, G. A., Jiménez, C. A., Onn, A., Lin, E. H., & Morice, R. C. (2006) · CHEST Journal · doi:10.1016/s0012-3692(15)50902-1 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Marchetti, A., Lorito, A. D., Pace, M. V., et al. (2016) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2015.12.111 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Pujol, J.-L., Barlési, F., & Daurès, J. (2006) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.11.001 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Bevacizumab Prevents Brain Metastases Formation in Lung Adenocarcinoma
Ilhan-Mutlu, A., Osswald, M., Liao, Y., Gömmel, M., Reck, M., Miles, D., Mariani, P., Gianni, L., Lutiger, B., Nendel, V., et al. (2016) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-15-0582 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationTrends and Characteristics of Young Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in the United States
Thomas, A., Chen, Y., Yu, T., Jakopović, M., & Giaccone, G. (2015) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2015.00113 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Karampeazis, A., Voutsina, A., Souglakos, J., Kentepozidis, N., Giassas, S., Christofillakis, C., Kotsakis, A., Papakotoulas, P., Rapti, A., Agelidou, M., et al. (2013) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.28132 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
McCourt, C., McArt, D. G., Mills, K., Catherwood, M. A., Maxwell, P., Waugh, D. J. J., Hamilton, P., O’Sullivan, J. M., & Salto‐Tellez, M. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069604 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Socinski, M. A., Langer, C. J., Okamoto, I., Hon, J. K., Hirsh, V., Dakhil, S. R., Page, R. D., Orsini, J., Zhang, H., & Renschler, M. F. (2013) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mds461 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Rossi, A., Chiodini, P., Sun, J., O'Brien, M. E. R., von Plessen, C., Barata, F. J., Park, K., Popat, S., Bergman, B., Parente, B., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70402-4 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Self-citationChallenges of phase 1 clinical trials evaluating immune checkpoint-targeted antibodies
Postel-Vinay, S. C., Aspeslagh, S., Lanoy, É., Robert, C., Soria, J., & Marabelle, A. (2015) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv550 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Increasing Lung Cancer Death Rates Among Young Women in Southern and Midwestern States
Jemal, A., Ma, J., Rosenberg, P. S., Siegel, R. L., & Anderson, W. F. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.42.6098 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Nishino, M., Gargano, M., Suda, M., Ramaiya, N. H., & Hodi, F. S. (2014) · Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · doi:10.1186/2051-1426-2-17 · Cited by 95 · cited 1× · see citing works
“More recently, immune-related response criteria (irRC) have been proposed and validated in malignant melanoma to better assess the variety of responses that can be generated upon imAbs [176, 177].”
BackgroundLim, S. H., Lee, J. Y., Lee, M.-Y., Kim, H. S., Lee, J. H., Sun, J., Ahn, J. S., Um, S., Kim, H., Kim, B. S., et al. (2014) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu584 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Lima, A. B. C., Macedo, L. T., & Sasse, A. D. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022681 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Chang, J. Y., Liu, Y., Zhu, Z., Welsh, J. W., Gomez, D. R., Komaki, R., Roth, J. A., & Swisher, S. G. (2013) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.28217 · Cited by 91 · cited 12× · see citing works
“The age of the patient significantly influenced survival (P = 0.04), with SRS alone favoured in patients aged 50 or younger, and with no significant survival differences in patients aged >50.”
BackgroundInfluentialMetastasectomy for synchronous solitary non-small cell lung cancer metastases
Tönnies, M., Pfannschmidt, J., Bauer, T. T., Kollmeier, J., Tönnies, S., & Kaiser, D. (2014) · The Annals of Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.03.028 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
BioCAST/IFCT-1002: epidemiological and molecular features of lung cancer in never-smokers
Couraud, S., Souquet, P.-J., Paris, C., et al. (2015) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00097214 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Blackhall, F. H., Kim, D., Besse, B., Nokihara, H., Han, J., Wilner, K. D., Reisman, A. L., Iyer, S. S., Hirsh, V., & Shaw, A. T. (2014) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1097/jto.0000000000000318 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Chapter 6: Lung Cancer in Never Smokers: Epidemiology and Risk Prediction Models
McCarthy, W. J., Meza, R., Jeon, J., & Moolgavkar, S. H. (2012) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01768.x · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Lilenbaum, R., Villaflor, V. M., Langer, C. J., et al. (2009) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1097/jto.0b013e3181a9a020 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Maintenance Therapy With Continuous or Switch Strategy in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Zhang, X., Zang, J., Xu, J., Bai, C., Qin, Y., Liu, K., Wu, C., Wu, M., He, Q., Zhang, S., et al. (2011) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.10-2745 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Li, M., Zhang, Q., Fu, P., Li, P., Peng, A., Zhang, G., Song, X., Tan, M., Li, X., Liu, Y., et al. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037229 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Monitoring EGFR T790M with plasma DNA from lung cancer patients in a prospective observational study
Sueoka‐Aragane, N., Katakami, N., Satouchi, M., Yokota, S., Aoe, K., Iwanaga, K., Otsuka, K., Morita, S., Kimura, S. H., Negoro, S., et al. (2015) · Cancer Science · doi:10.1111/cas.12847 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Novello, S., Kaiser, R., Mellemgaard, A., Douillard, J.-Y., Orlov, S., Krzakowski, M., von Pawel, J., Gottfried, M., Bondarenko, I., Liao, M., et al. (2015) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2014.11.015 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Zhao, N., Zhang, X., Yan, H., Yang, J., & Wu, Y.-L. L. C. (2014) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.03.026 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Griffioen, G. H. M. J., Lagerwaard, F. J., Haasbeek, C. J. A., Smit, E. F., Slotman, B. J., & Senan, S. (2013) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2013.04.026 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationKuhn, M. J., Hammer, G. M., Swenson, L. C., Youssef, H. T., & Gleason, T. J. (1994) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/0895-6111(94)90011-6 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Viola, P., Maurya, M., Croud, J., Gazdová, J., Suleman, N., Lim, E. K. S., Newsom‐Davis, T., Plowman, N., Rice, A. J., Montero, Á., et al. (2016) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2016.03.019 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationMorère, J., Bréchot, J.-M., Westeel, V., Gounant, V., Lebeau, B., Vaylet, F., Barlési, F., Urban, T., Souquet, P.-J., Debieuvre, D., et al. (2010) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.03.003 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Guetz, G. D., Uzzan, B., Nicolas, P., Valeyre, D., Sebbane, G., & Morère, J. (2012) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2012.03.007 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Blakely, C. M., & Bivona, T. G. (2012) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-12-0387 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Qi, W., Tang, L., He, A., et al. (2012) · Lung · doi:10.1007/s00408-012-9399-3 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Bronte, G., Rolfo, C., Passiglia, F., Rizzo, S., Gil-Bazo, I., Fiorentino, E., Cajozzo, M., Van Meerbeeck, J. P., Lequaglie, C., Santini, D., et al. (2015) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.03.010 · Cited by 32 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A recently published meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing the efficacy and safety of platinum-based doublets versus single-agent regimens in the first-line therapy of PS 2 patients revealed platinum-based regimens to be superior in terms of RR and survival (74% higher probability of being alive after 1 year) d…”
MethodWelter, S., Chalvatzoulis, E., Christof, D., Theegarten, D., Stamatis, G., & Cheufou, D. (2014) · The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon · doi:10.1055/s-0034-1377060 · Cited by 20 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In a retrospective study of 37 patients with synchronous NSCLC and brain metastasis, which were both surgically excised [174], the 1- and 2-year OS rates were 62% and 24%, respectively.”
BackgroundOxnard, G. R., Thress, K. S., Alden, R. S., Lawrance, R., Paweletz, C. P., Cantarini, M., Barrett, C., Yang, J., & Jänne, P. (2016) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1556-0864(16)30328-8 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Zacho, H. D., Karthigaseu, N. N., Fonager, R. F., & Petersen, L. J. (2016) · BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care · doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000957 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Paz-Ares, L., Socinski, M. A., Shahidi, J., Hozak, R. R., Soldatenkova, V., Thatcher, N., & Hirsch, F. (2016) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1556-0864(16)30326-4 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Chang, 2012, Meta-analysis: comparison of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and bone scintigraphy in the detection of bone metastasis in patients with lung cancer, Acad Radiol, 19, 349, 10.1016/j.acra.2011.10.018 · DOI
- Ung, 2016, Impact of the lung oncology multidisciplinary team meetings on the management of patients with cancer, Asia Pac J Clin Oncol, 12, e298, 10.1111/ajco.12192 · DOI
- Rowland, 2016, Quality of life, support and smoking in advanced lung cancer patients: a qualitative study, BMJ Support Palliat Care, 6, 35, 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000589 · DOI
- Cortot, 2016, Weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus docetaxel as second or third line treatment in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): results from the phase III study IFCT-1103 ULTIMATE, J Clin Oncol, 34
- Reckamp, 2015, Phase 3, randomized trial (CheckMate 017) of nivolumab (NIVO) vs docetaxel in advanced squamous (SQ) cell non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), J Thorac Oncol, 10, S174
- Gralla, 2015, Evaluation of disease-related symptoms in patients with advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab or docetaxel, J Thorac Oncol, 10, S233
- Stahel, 2015, Ann Oncol, 26
- Mitsudomi, 2015, AZD9291 in pre-treated T790M positive advanced NSCLC: AURA2 phase II study, J Thorac Oncol, 10, S320
- Shaw, 2004, Pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusions, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 1, CD002916
- Patil, 2012, Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) alone versus WBRT and radiosurgery for the treatment of brain metastases, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 9, CD006121
- Soon, 2014, Surgery or radiosurgery plus whole brain radiotherapy versus surgery or radiosurgery alone for brain metastases, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 3, CD009454
- Mulvenna, 2015, Whole brain radiotherapy for brain metastases from non-small lung cancer: quality of life (QoL) and overall survival (OS) results from the UK Medical Research Council QUARTZ randomised clinical trial (ISRCTN 3826061), J Clin Oncol, 33
- Tsao, 2012, Whole brain radiotherapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple brain metastases, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 4, CD003869
- Vecht, 1994, Dose-effect relationship of dexamethasone on Karnofsky performance in metastatic brain tumors: a randomized study of doses of 4, 8, and 16 mg per day, Neurology, 44, 675, 10.1212/WNL.44.4.675 · DOI
- Rosen, 2004, Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and other solid tumors: a randomized, phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, Cancer, 100, 2613, 10.1002/cncr.20308 · DOI · Paper page
- Kozower, 2013, Special treatment issues in non-small cell lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, Chest, 143, e369S, 10.1378/chest.12-2362 · DOI · Paper page
- Eberhardt, 2015, The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the m descriptors in the forthcoming eighth edition of the TNM classification of lung cancer, J Thorac Oncol, 10, 1515, 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000673 · DOI
- Saenger, 2008, The heterogeneity of the kinetics of response to ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma: patient cases, Cancer Immun, 8, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Osimertinib in Untreated <i>EGFR</i> -Mutated Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Soria, J.-C., Ohe, Y., Vansteenkiste, J., Reungwetwattana, T., Chewaskulyong, B., Lee, K. H., Dechaphunkul, A., Imamura, F., Nogami, N., Kurata, T., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1713137 · Cited by 5,508 · see citing works
Self-citationOsimertinib or Platinum–Pemetrexed in <i>EGFR</i> T790M–Positive Lung Cancer
Mok, T. S., Wu, Y.-L., Ahn, M.-J., Garassino, M. C., Kim, H. R., Ramalingam, S. S., Shepherd, F. A., He, Y., Akamatsu, H., Theelen, W. S. M. E., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1612674 · Cited by 3,379 · see citing works
Wu, Y.-L., Zhou, C., Hu, C.-P., Feng, J., Lu, S., Huang, Y., Li, W., Hou, M., Shi, J. H., Lee, K. Y., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70604-1 · Cited by 1,978 · see citing works
West, H., McCleod, M., Hussein, M., Morabito, A., Rittmeyer, A., Conter, H. J., Kopp, H.-G., Daniel, D., McCune, S., Mekhail, T., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30167-6 · Cited by 1,662 · see citing works
Paz-Ares, L. G., de Marinis, F., Dediu, M., Thomas, M., Pujol, J.-L., Bidoli, P., Molinier, O., Sahoo, T. P., Laack, E., Reck, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.47.1102 · Cited by 624 · see citing works
Paz-Ares, L., de Marinis, F., Dediu, M., Thomas, M., Pujol, J.-L., Bidoli, P., Molinier, O., Sahoo, T. P., Laack, E., Reck, M., et al. (2012) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70063-3 · Cited by 610 · see citing works
Self-citationGarassino, M. C., Cho, B.-C., Kim, J.-H., Mazières, J., Vansteenkiste, J., Lena, H., Corral Jaime, J., Gray, J. E., Powderly, J., Chouaid, C., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30144-x · Cited by 568 · see citing works
Self-citationSoria, J.-C., Felip, E., Cobo, M., Lu, S., Syrigos, K., Lee, K. H., Göker, E., Georgoulias, V., Li, W., Isla, D., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00006-6 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Oxnard, G. R., Yang, J. C.-H., Yu, H., Kim, S.-W., Saka, H., Horn, L., Goto, K., Ohe, Y., Mann, H., Thress, K. S., et al. (2020) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2020.01.013 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Soria, J.-C., Wu, Y.-L., Nakagawa, K., Kim, S.-W., Yang, J.-J., Ahn, M.-J., Wang, J., Yang, J. C.-H., Lu, Y., Atagi, S., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00121-7 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Soria, J.-C., Mauguen, A., Reck, M., Sandler, A. B., Saijo, N., Johnson, D. H., Burcoveanu, D., Fukuoka, M., Besse, B., & Pignon, J.-P. (2013) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mds590 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Jenkins, S., Yang, J. C.-H., Ramalingam, S. S., Yu, K., Patel, S., Weston, S., Hodge, R., Cantarini, M., Jänne, P. A., Mitsudomi, T., et al. (2017) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2017.04.003 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Goss, G., Tsai, C.-M., Shepherd, F. A., Ahn, M.-J., Bazhenova, L., Crinò, L., de Marinis, F., Felip, E., Morabito, A., Hodge, R., et al. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx820 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Jeanson, A., Tomasini, P., Souquet-Bressand, M., Brandone, N., Boucekine, M., Grangeon, M., Chaleat, S., Khobta, N., Milia, J., Mhanna, L., et al. (2019) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2019.01.011 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Self-citationYang, J. C.-H., Shepherd, F. A., Kim, D.-W., Lee, G.-W., Lee, J. S., Chang, G.-C., Lee, S. S., Wei, Y.-F., Lee, Y. G., Laus, G., et al. (2019) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2019.02.001 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Yang, J. C.-H., Camidge, D. R., Yang, C.-T., Zhou, J., Guo, R., Chiu, C.-H., Chang, G.-C., Shiah, H.-S., Chen, Y., Wang, C.-C., et al. (2020) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2020.09.001 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Zimmermann, S., Dziadziuszko, R., & Peters, S. (2014) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.03.005 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Self-citationLee, J.-K., Hahn, S., Kim, D.-W., Suh, K. J., Keam, B., Kim, T. M., Lee, S.-H., & Heo, D. S. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.3314 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
ROS-1 Fusions in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Evidence to Date
Gendarme, S., Bylicki, O., Chouaid, C., & Guisier, F. (2022) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3390/curroncol29020057 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Grossi, F., Crinò, L., Logroscino, A., Canova, S., Delmonte, A., Melotti, B., Proto, C., Gelibter, A., Cappuzzo, F., Turci, D., et al. (2018) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2018.05.015 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Girard, N. (2018) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon-2017-0636 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Minari, R., Bordi, P., Del Re, M., Facchinetti, F., Mazzoni, F., Barbieri, F., Camerini, A., Comin, C. E., Gnetti, L., Azzoni, C., et al. (2018) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.11.011 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Metastasectomy for synchronous solitary non-small cell lung cancer metastases
Tönnies, M., Pfannschmidt, J., Bauer, T. T., Kollmeier, J., Tönnies, S., & Kaiser, D. (2014) · The Annals of Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.03.028 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
The smell of lung disease: a review of the current status of electronic nose technology
van der Sar, I. G., Wijbenga, N., Nakshbandi, G., Aerts, J. G. J. V., Manintveld, O. C., Wijsenbeek, M. S., Hellemons, M. E., & Moor, C. C. (2021) · Respiratory Research · doi:10.1186/s12931-021-01835-4 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Efficacy of nivolumab in pre-treated non-small-cell lung cancer patients harbouring KRAS mutations
Passiglia, F., Cappuzzo, F., Alabiso, O., Bettini, A. C., Bidoli, P., Chiari, R., Defferrari, C., Delmonte, A., Finocchiaro, G., Francini, G., et al. (2019) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-018-0234-3 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
KRAS in NSCLC: State of the Art and Future Perspectives
Cascetta, P., Marinello, A., Lazzari, C., Gregorc, V., Planchard, D., Bianco, R., Normanno, N., & Morabito, A. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14215430 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Halmos, B., Tan, E.-H., Soo, R. A., Cadranel, J., Lee, M. K., Foucher, P., Hsia, T.-C., Hochmair, M., Griesinger, F., Hida, T., et al. (2019) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.10.028 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Griffioen, G. H. M. J., Lagerwaard, F. J., Haasbeek, C. J. A., Smit, E. F., Slotman, B. J., & Senan, S. (2013) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2013.04.026 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationGoss, G. D., Felip, E., Cobo, M., Lu, S., Syrigos, K., Lee, K. H., Göker, E., Georgoulias, V., Li, W., Guclu, S., et al. (2018) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0775 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Jenkins, S., Chih-Hsin Yang, J., Jänne, P. A., Thress, K. S., Yu, K., Hodge, R., Weston, S., Dearden, S., Patel, S., Cantarini, M., et al. (2017) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2017.05.002 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Yusoh, N. A., Ahmad, H., Vallis, K. A., & Gill, M. R. (2025) · Medical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s12032-025-02812-3 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Gargiulo, P., Arenare, L., Gridelli, C., Morabito, A., Ciardiello, F., Gebbia, V., Maione, P., Spagnuolo, A., Palumbo, G., Esposito, G., et al. (2021) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-021-08323-4 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Mahiat, C., Bihin, B., Duplaquet, F., Stanciu Pop, C., Dupont, M., Vander Borght, T., Rondelet, B., Vanderick, J., André, B., Pirard, L., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24043618 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
de Jong, C., Herder, G. J. M., & Deneer, V. H. M. (2020) · Thoracic Cancer · doi:10.1111/1759-7714.13683 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Novello, S., Barlesi, F., Califano, R., Cufer, T., Ekman, S., Levra, M. G., Kerr, K., Popat, S., Reck, M., Senan, S., Simo, G. V., Vansteenkiste, J., & Peters, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Turin (IT)
- The Christie Hospital (GB)
- Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble (FR)
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Royal Marsden Hospital (GB)
- German Center for Lung Research (DE)
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Annals of Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- suppl 5
- Pages
- v1-v27
- ISSN
- 0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163351155
- Cited by
- 2,631
- References
- 159
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 151 · 2023: 212 · 2022: 265 · 2021: 473 · 2020: 375 · 2019: 329 · 2018: 246 · 2017: 164 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 87 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 71 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 236.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
- IRIS (submittedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Amgen
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Pfizer
- AstraZeneca
- Ariad Pharmaceuticals
- Celgene
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche
- Varian Medical Systems
- Les Laboratories Pierre Fabre
- Clovis Oncology
- Daiichi-Sankyo
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
- Keywords
- metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, lung squamous cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR mutation testing, ALK rearrangement, molecular testing, staging, risk assessment, bone metastasis, systemic therapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, smoking cessation, multidisciplinary tumor board, treatment follow-up
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review