The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Source attribution, emission factors and regulation
Open accessAbstract
There is an increasing concern about the occurrence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the environment as they are ubiquitous in ambient air and some of them are among the strongest known carcinogens. PAHs and their derivatives are produced by the incomplete combustion of organic material arising, partly, from natural combustion such as forest and volcanic eruption, but with the majority due to anthropogenic emissions. The PAH concentration varies significantly in various rural and urban environments and is mainly influenced by vehicular and domestic emissions. The review serves as a database to identify and characterize the emission sources of PAHs and hence various approaches including diagnostic ratio (DR) and principal component analysis (PCA) are discussed in detail. These approaches allow individual PAHs to be associated with their origin sources. The factors that effect PAH emission and estimated emission rate are also discussed in this paper. Although the levels of low molecular weight PAHs are high in vapor phase, most of the probable human carcinogenic PAHs are found to be associated with particulate matter, especially in fine mode particles in ambient air. Many countries have proposed a non-mandatory concentration limit for PAHs, whereas the health risk studies conducted in relation to PAH exposure, urge that these pollutants should be given a high priority when considering air quality management and reduction of impacts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
PAH diagnostic ratios for the identification of pollution emission sources
Tobiszewski, M., & Namieśnik, J. (2012) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2011.10.025 · Cited by 1,881
A review of biomass burning: Emissions and impacts on air quality, health and climate in China
Chen, J., Li, C., Ristovski, Z., Milic, A., Gu, Y., Islam, M. S., Wang, S., Hao, J., Zhang, H., He, C., et al. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.025 · Cited by 1,262
Alves, C. A., Vicente, A. M., Custódio, D., Cerqueira, M., Nunes, T., Pio, C., Lucarelli, F., Calzolai, G., Nava, S., Diapouli, E., et al. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.256 · Cited by 261
Markiewicz, A., Björklund, K., Eriksson, E., Kalmykova, Y., Strömvall, A.-M., & Siopi, A. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.074 · Cited by 164
Faraca, G., Boldrin, A., & Astrup, T. (2019) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.005 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- RAVINDRA, K., SOKHI, R., & VANGRIEKEN, R.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 2895-2921
- ISSN
- 1352-2310 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096379616
- Cited by
- 2,617
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Source attribution, emission factors and regulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.12.010
- The paper
- RAVINDRA, K., SOKHI, R., & VANGRIEKEN, R. (2008). Atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Source attribution, emission factors and regulation. Atmospheric Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.12.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.