Cited by 107

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Validation of the MIMOSA-AURORA-IFDM model chain for policy support: Modeling concentrations of elemental carbon in Flanders

Lefebvre, Wouter, Vercauteren, Jordy, Schrooten, Liesbeth, Janssen, Stijn, Degraeuwe, Bart, Maenhaut, Willy, de Vlieger, Ina, Vankerkom, Jean, Cosemans, Guido, Mensink, Clemens, Veldeman, Nele, Deutsch, Felix, Van Looy, Stijn, Peelaerts, Wim, Lefebre, Filip·2011·Atmospheric Environment

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.033

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Beckx, 2009, The contribution of activity-based transport models to air quality modelling: a validation of the ALBATROSS-AURORA model chain, Sci. Total. Environ., 407, 3814, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.03.015 · DOI
  2. Bultynck, 1972, Evaluation of atmospheric dilution factors for effluents diffused from an elevated continuous point source, Tellus, 24, 453, 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1972.tb01572.x · DOI
  3. De Ridder, 2008, Simulating the impact of urban sprawl on air quality and population exposure in the German Ruhr area. Part I: reproducing the base state, Atmos. Environ., 42, 7059, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.045 · DOI
  4. Deutsch, 2008, Application and validation of a comprehensive model for PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in Belgium and Europe, Appl. Math. Model., 32, 1501, 10.1016/j.apm.2007.04.011 · DOI
  5. Deutsch, 2008, Modeling changes of aerosol compositions over Belgium and Europe, Int. J. Environ. Pollut., 32, 162, 10.1504/IJEP.2008.017101 · DOI
  6. Dijkema, 2008, Air quality effects of an urban highway speed limit reduction, Atmos. Environ., 42, 9098, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.039 · DOI
  7. Gauderman, 2007, Effect of exposure to traffic on lung development from 10 to 18 years of age: a cohort study, Lancet, 369, 571, 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60037-3 · DOI
  8. Gery, 1989, A photochemical kinetics mechanism for urban and regional scale computer modeling, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 925, 10.1029/JD094iD10p12925 · DOI
  9. Hitzenberger, 2006, Intercomparison of thermal and optical measurement methods for elemental carbon and black carbon at an urban location, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 6377, 10.1021/es051228v · DOI
  10. Hoek, 2002, Association between mortality and indicators of traffic-related air pollution in the Netherlands: a cohort study, The Lancet, 360, 1203, 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11280-3 · DOI
  11. Lefebvre, 2011, Modeling the effects of a speed limit reduction on traffic-related elemental carbon (EC) concentrations and population exposure to EC, Atmos. Environ., 45, 197, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.026 · DOI
  12. Maes, 2009, Spatial surrogates for the disaggregation of CORINAIR emission inventories, Atmos. Environ., 43, 1246, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.11.040 · DOI
  13. Mensink, 2000, An urban transport emission model for the Antwerp area, Atmos. Environ., 34, 4595, 10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00215-6 · DOI
  14. Mensink, 2001, Computational Aspects of Air Quality Modelling in Urban Regions Using an Optimal Resolution Approach (AURORA), vol. 2179
  15. Mills, 2007, Ischemic and thrombotic effects of dilute diesel-exhaust inhalation in men with coronary heart disease, N. Engl. J. Med., 357, 1075, 10.1056/NEJMoa066314 · DOI
  16. Olesen, 1995, The model validation exercise at Mol: overview of results, Int. J. Environ. Pollut., 5, 761
  17. Patel, 2009, Spatial and temporal variations in traffic-related particulate matter at New York City high schools, Atmos. Environ., 43, 4975, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.004 · DOI
  18. PROMOTE, 2009a. GMES service element Promote 2; C6 Validation Report, Chapter 9: Local air quality forecast service, Version 3, http://www.oma.be/PROMOTE_validation_office/Documents/C6_2009/C6-09_AQ-LocForecast_v3.pdf.
  19. PROMOTE, 2009b. GMES service element Promote 2; C6 Validation Report, Chapter 10: Urban and Regional Air Quality Assessment Service, Version 3, http://www.oma.be/PROMOTE_validation_office/Documents/C6_2009/C6-10_AQ-Assessment_v3.pdf.
  20. Putaud, 2010, A European aerosol phenomenology – 3: physical and chemical characteristics of particulate matter from 60 rural, urban and kerbside sites across Europe, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1308, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.011 · DOI
  21. Quincey, 2009, An evaluation of measurement methods for organic, elemental and black carbon in ambient air monitoring sites, Atmos. Environ., 43, 5085, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.041 · DOI
  22. Schaap, 2004, Anthropogenic black carbon and fine aerosol distributions over Europe, J. Geophys. Res., 109
  23. Van de Vel, 2010, Air-quality modelling in the Lake Baikal region, Environ. Monit. Assess., 165, 665, 10.1007/s10661-009-0977-7 · DOI
  24. Venkatachari, 2006, An intercomparison of measurement methods for carbonaceous aerosol in the ambient air in New York city, Aerosol. Sci. Technol., 40, 788, 10.1080/02786820500380289 · DOI
  25. Venkatram, 2006, Approximating dispersion from a finite line source, Atmos. Environ., 40, 2401, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.014 · DOI
  26. Vercauteren, 2011, Chemkar PM10: an extensive look at the local differences in chemical composition of PM10 in Flanders, Belgium, Atmos. Environ., 45, 108, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.040 · DOI
  27. Walcek, 2000, Minor flux adjustment near mixing ratio extremes for simplified yet highly accurate monotonic calculation of tracer advection, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 9335, 10.1029/1999JD901142 · DOI
  28. Xue, 2000, The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS) – a multiscale non-hydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction tool. Part I: model dynamics and verification, Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 75, 161, 10.1007/s007030070003 · DOI
  29. Xue, 2001, The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS) – a multiscale non-hydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction tool. Part II: model physics and applications, Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 76, 134, 10.1007/s007030170027 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lefebvre, W., Vercauteren, J., Schrooten, L., Janssen, S., Degraeuwe, B., Maenhaut, W., de Vlieger, I., Vankerkom, J., Cosemans, G., Mensink, C., Veldeman, N., Deutsch, F., Van Looy, S., Peelaerts, W., & Lefebre, F.
Venue
Atmospheric Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
45
Issue
37
Pages
6705-6713
ISSN
1352-2310
Cited by
107
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review