The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ultrafine particle emissions from desktop 3D printers
Open accessAbstract
The development of low-cost desktop versions of three-dimensional (3D) printers has made these devices widely accessible for rapid prototyping and small-scale manufacturing in home and office settings. Many desktop 3D printers rely on heated thermoplastic extrusion and deposition, which is a process that has been shown to have significant aerosol emissions in industrial environments. However, we are not aware of any data on particle emissions from commercially available desktop 3D printers. Therefore, we report on measurements of size-resolved and total ultrafine particle (UFP) concentrations resulting from the operation of two types of commercially available desktop 3D printers inside a commercial office space. We also estimate size-resolved (11.5 nm–116 nm) and total UFP (<100 nm) emission rates and compare them to emission rates from other desktop devices and indoor activities known to emit fine and ultrafine particles. Estimates of emission rates of total UFPs were large, ranging from ∼2.0 × 1010 # min−1 for a 3D printer utilizing a polylactic acid (PLA) feedstock to ∼1.9 × 1011 # min−1 for the same type of 3D printer utilizing a higher temperature acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) thermoplastic feedstock. Because most of these devices are currently sold as standalone devices without any exhaust ventilation or filtration accessories, results herein suggest caution should be used when operating in inadequately ventilated or unfiltered indoor environments. Additionally, these results suggest that more controlled experiments should be conducted to more fundamentally evaluate particle emissions from a wider arrange of desktop 3D printers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodegradation and biocompatibility of PLA and PLGA microspheres
Anderson, J. M., & Shive, M. S. (1997) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(97)00048-3 · Cited by 2,617
Biodegradable nanoparticles for drug delivery and targeting
Hans, M. L., & Lowman, A. M. (2002) · Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science · doi:10.1016/s1359-0286(02)00117-1 · Cited by 1,324
Cited by
Plastic and Human Health: A Micro Issue?
Wright, S. L., & Kelly, F. J. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b00423 · Cited by 3,413
(Nano)plastics in the environment - Sources, fates and effects
da Costa, J. P., Santos, P. S. M., Duarte, A. C., & Rocha-Santos, T. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.041 · Cited by 1,139
Quantifying ecological risks of aquatic micro- and nanoplastic
Besseling, E., Redondo-Hasselerharm, P., Foekema, E. M., & Koelmans, A. A. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2018.1531688 · Cited by 564
Sustainability of additive manufacturing: An overview on its energy demand and environmental impact
Peng, T., Kellens, K., Tang, R., Chen, C., & Chen, G. (2018) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.022 · Cited by 426
Azimi, P., Zhao, D., Pouzet, C., Crain, N. E., & Stephens, B. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b04983 · Cited by 389
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stephens, B., Azimi, P., El Orch, Z., & Ramos, T.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 79
- Pages
- 334-339
- ISSN
- 1352-2310 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127304106
- Cited by
- 488
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrafine particle emissions from desktop 3D printers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.050
- The paper
- Stephens, B., Azimi, P., El Orch, Z., & Ramos, T. (2013). Ultrafine particle emissions from desktop 3D printers. Atmospheric Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.050
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.