Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 37Air Quality and Health ImpactsAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recycling concrete: An undiscovered source of ultrafine particles

Open access
Kumar, Prashant, Morawska, Lidia·2014·Atmospheric Environment

Abstract

While concrete recycling is practiced worldwide, there are many unanswered questions in relation to ultrafine particle (UFP; Dp < 100 nm) emissions and exposure around recycling sites. In particular: (i) Does recycling produce UFPs and in what quantities? (ii) How do they disperse around the source? (iii) What impact does recycling have on ambient particle number concentrations (PNCs) and exposure? (iv) How effective are commonly used dust respirators to limit exposure? We measured size-resolved particles in the 5–560 nm range at five distances between 0.15 and 15.15 m that were generated by an experimentally simulated concrete recycling source and found that: (i) the size distributions were multimodal, with up to ∼93% of total PNC in the UFP size range; and (ii) dilution was a key particle transformation mechanism. UFPs showed a much slower decay rate, requiring ∼62% more distance to reach 10% of their initial concentration compared with their larger counterparts in the 100–560 nm size range. Compared with typical urban exposure during car journeys, exposure decay profiles showed up to ∼5 times higher respiratory deposition within 10 m of the source. Dust respirators were found to remove half of total PNC; however the removal factor for UFPs was only ∼57% of that observed in the 100–560 nm size range. These findings highlight a need for developing an understanding of the nature of the particles as well as for better control measures to limit UFP exposure.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.035

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. EU, 2008, Commission regulation (EC) No 692/2008, Official Journal of the European Union, 136

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kumar, P., & Morawska, L.
Affiliations
University of Surrey (GB)
Corresponding author
Kumar, Prashant
Venue
Atmospheric Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
90
Pages
51-58
ISSN
1352-2310 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973229707
Cited by
37
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
  • cc-by-nc-nd
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Atmospheric Environment (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation; Science & Engineering Faculty
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Keywords
concrete recycling, ultrafine particles, particle number concentration, particle size distribution, particle dispersion, respiratory tract deposition, dust respirators, size-resolved particles, construction dust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.