Cited by 292Atmospheric aerosols and cloudsAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Worldwide validation of CAMS and MERRA-2 reanalysis aerosol optical depth products using 15 years of AERONET observations

Gueymard, Christian A., Yang, Dazhi·2020·Atmospheric Environment

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117216

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gueymard, C. A., & Yang, D.
Affiliations
Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
Corresponding author
Yang, Dazhi
Venue
Atmospheric Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
225
Pages
117216
ISSN
1352-2310 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2994648189
Cited by
292
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 13
FWCI
14.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Atmospheric Environment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
aerosol optical depth, CAMS reanalysis, MERRA-2, AERONET, Ångström exponent, reanalysis evaluation, elevation correction, Köppen-Geiger climate zones, aerosol remote sensing, model intercomparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review