Cited by 23Marine and fisheries researchMarine and coastal ecosystemsAtmospheric aerosols and clouds

African desert dust influences migrations and fisheries of the Atlantic skipjack-tuna

Open access
Rodríguez, Sergio, Riera, Rodrigo, Fonteneau, Alain, Alonso-Pérez, Silvia, López-Darias, Jessica·2023·Atmospheric Environment

Abstract

Atmospheric deposition of desert dust and other aerosols influence on the open ocean ecosystem and climate. These aerosols provide iron, phosphorus and bio-essential trace elements, which affect the composition and growth of phytoplankton, generating new organic matter that is distributed across the food web. Although this process has an impact on upper trophic levels and fisheries, direct evidence is lacking. Skipjack tropical tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) is the most important commercial tuna in the Atlantic, main stocks occur in the tropical and subtropical North-East Atlantic. We found that the migrations and fisheries of skipjack are connected to Saharan dust variability. From boreal winter to summer, skipjack performs an Atlantic-Saharan migration, from equatorial (0-5°N) to subtropical waters of the North-East Atlantic (regularly reaching open waters off Mauritania ∼20°N and the Canary Islands ∼28°N), tracking the seasonal shift of dust deposition in the North-East Atlantic. The observed long-term associations of skipjack catch with the seasonal cycles, anomalies and meridional variability of dust over the North-East Atlantic, shows that along the year skipjack catches mainly occur in waters affected by massive dust deposition linked (i) to dust wet deposition in tropical waters and (ii) to dust dry deposition in the Saharan desert-dust outflow. Atmospheric deposition of dust in the open ocean and in upwelling waters contributes to support zooplankton-rich areas, which are optimal for feeding small fish, molluscs and cephalopods, and suitable for feeding large predators, as skipjacks, where they are caught in abundance. The most important fishing area of Atlantic skipjack tuna is located off North West Africa in the waters affected by massive dust deposition that underly the dusty airstream from the North Africa desert. The role of dust as fertilizing and supporter of phytoplankton and zooplankton rich areas also has implications for other species of fishing interest, including other tropical tuna (e.g. bigeye and yellowfin), which are often exploited simultaneously with skipjack by the same fisheries. As far as we know this is the first study showing the connexions between atmospheric inputs of desert dust to ocean and the migrations and fisheries of marine species. These results have important implications on our understanding on the influence of atmospheric dust on marine ecosystems and on the management of fisheries.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study links Saharan dust deposition in the North-East Atlantic to skipjack tuna migrations and fisheries, proposing an “Atlantic-Saharan migration” that tracks the seasonal shift of dust deposition. It finds skipjack catches concentrate in dust-fertilized and upwelled waters, with catch variability correlated to dust anomalies.

Key findings

  • Atlantic skipjack catches average around 253,000 tonnes/year (2011–2020), accounting for 48% of total tuna catches and 56% of tropical tuna catches; about 65% are caught in the NE Atlantic off NW Africa (0–30°N; 30°W–10°E), a region almost permanently affected by the Saharan Air Layer dust plume.
  • Skipjack catches track the seasonal dust shift: high catches occur in winter equatorial waters affected by dust wet deposition, in spring off Liberia to Guinea (5–10°N), and in summer off Mauritania to the Canary Islands (17–30°N) in waters affected by massive dry deposition.
  • Annual catches exceed 500 tonnes/1°×1° grid where massive dust deposition occurs over upwelled waters, such as off Mauritania; the NE Atlantic receives about 45% of global desert dust inputs to the ocean (450 Tg/y).
  • Long-term skipjack catches off NW Africa are positively correlated with dust anomalies at the northern and southern ends of the migration route, and FAD catch per fishing hour off Senegal and Mauritania is positively correlated with dust anomalies.

Methods

  • Used two skipjack catch datasets: Canary Islands Government data and the ICCAT TASK2 T2CE subset for PS FAD/FSC, with 1°×1° monthly catches and effort; monthly means and interannual variability were analysed for 2014–2019, excluding January–February in some regions due to a fishing moratorium.
  • Used Aqua-MODIS satellite chlorophyll-a/POC and AOD, MERRA-2 column dust load and dry/wet dust deposition, and NASA Ocean Biogeochemical Model dissolved iron and nitrate; catches were compared with dust average distributions and anomalies calculated relative to 2014–2019 monthly averages.
  • Analysed spatial distributions, monthly time series, meridional variability at ~20°W, and correlations between skipjack catches or catch per hour and dust anomalies.

Limitations

  • Stated: further research is needed to assess how deposition of desert dust, wildfire, industrial, and urban aerosols modifies phytoplankton and zooplankton composition and food-web implications; skipjack school behaviour linked to dust variability involves “still unknown patterns.”
  • Stated: data availability and consistency limited the monthly mean and interannual catch analysis to 2014–2019, and dissolved iron and nitrate model data were only available for 2014–2015.
  • Evident from the text: the study is observational and correlational, using modelled dust fields and fishery catch data; it does not experimentally establish causation, and some regions (e.g., off Togo, Benin, and Cape Lopez) show no dust–catch correlation, which the authors attribute to other nutrient sources such as river discharge or upwelling.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120022

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

19 of 29 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    North Atlantic waters underlying the SAL dust plume are richer in Fe, Si, Al, Ti, Mn, P and other trace metals bio-essential for phytoplankton, in comparison with South Atlantic waters.

    “Due to massive dust deposition, North Atlantic waters underlying the SAL dust plume are richer in Fe, Si, Al, Ti, Mn, P and other trace metals bio-essential for phytoplankton, in comparison with South Atlantic waters (Han et al., 2008;Ussher et al., 2013;Conway and John, 2014;Baker and Jickells, 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Han et al., 2008 source
    • cites Ussher et al., 2013 source

      Section 3.1, paragraph [14] reports higher surface-water Fe and Al in the tropical North Atlantic under the Saharan dust plume than in the central South Atlantic. The paper does not establish the claimed North–South enrichment of seawater Si, Ti, Mn, or P; the Introduction, paragraph [2], instead describes Atlantic P supply as predominantly in situ or by physical transport. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Baker and Jickells, 2017 source

      The Introduction and §3.2 report higher dissolved Fe and Al in North Atlantic surface waters, consistent with greater Saharan dust input. But §3.2 finds little north–south difference in surface-water Mn despite higher deposition, and the Introduction says atmospheric Si has little effect on water-column biogeochemistry. The paper therefore does not support the claim that the waters are richer in the entire listed set of elements; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    The NE Atlantic region off NW Africa is almost permanently affected by the dusty Saharan Air Layer (SAL) airstream.

    “In-situ measurements (Prospero and Lamb, 2003;Rodríguez et al., 2015;Rodríguez and López-Darias, 2021), satellite observations (Huang et al., 2010;Tsamalis et al., 2013) and models (Fig. 1B) show that this region is almost permanently affected by the dusty Saharan Air Layer (SAL) airstream (Prospero et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Prospero and Lamb, 2003 source
    • cites Rodríguez et al., 2015 source

      The paper describes the dusty SAL over the North Atlantic and reports that Izaña, off northwest Africa, is frequently within it in summer (study description; page unavailable). It does not support the stronger claim of almost permanent exposure: the Additional information passage says the SAL dust season at Izaña typically runs from late July to early September, with dust events on an average of 52% of August days. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Prospero et al., 2021 source

      In “Characterizing the SAL: BOMEX” (page unavailable), the paper says dust-laden Saharan air forms the SAL as it reaches Africa’s west coast, supporting the location and airstream description. It does not establish that the NE Atlantic off NW Africa is almost permanently affected; “Zuloaga’s ‘discovery’ of the SAL” instead describes seasonal shifts in dust transport. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    From boreal winter to summer, part of the skipjack stock located in equatorial waters performs a northward migratory movement off NW Africa, from the western Gulf of Guinea to the Canary Islands-often reaching Madeira and Azores-favoured by the seasonal northward shift of warm waters.

    “From boreal winter to summer, part of the skipjack stock located in equatorial waters performs a northward migratory movement off NW Africa, from the western Gulf of Guinea to the Canary Islands -often reaching Madeira (Hermida et al., 2019) and Azores-(ICCAT TASK II catch and effort statistics data) favoured by the seasonal northward shift of warm waters (Caniaux et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hermida et al., 2019 source
    • cites Caniaux et al., 2011 source
  • Premisecitation

    Off Mauritania, correlations between desert dust and the fluxes of phytoplanktonic (diatoms, coccolithophores, organic-walled dinoflagellate cysts) and zooplanktonic (foraminifera) species are observed during upwelling periods.

    “Off Mauritania, correlations between desert dust and the fluxes of phytoplanktonic (diatoms, coccolithophores, organic-walled dinoflagellate cysts) and zooplanktonic (foraminifera) species are observed during upwelling periods (Romero et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Romero et al., 2020 source
  • Interpretationcitation

    There is a strong coupling between aeolian dust inputs and the efficiency of the biological pump to rapidly transfer new organic matter to higher trophic levels.

    “This points to a strong coupling between aeolian dust inputs and the efficiency of the biological pump to rapidly transfer new organic matter to higher trophic levels (Fischer et al., 2019;Romero et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Fischer et al., 2019 source

      The Summary and Outlook reports strong coupling between dust flux and biological-pump efficiency, and proposes rapid sedimentation of dust-ballasted organic aggregates. It does not say that the pump rapidly transfers new organic matter to higher trophic levels; the transfer described is downward particle export. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Romero et al., 2020 source

      The Statistical analyses (lines 508–510; page unavailable) report a strong correlation between lithogenic flux and fluxes of primary and secondary producers. The Plankton variability discussion (lines 514–524; page unavailable) identifies Saharan and Sahelian dust and notes that those producers’ fluxes peak at roughly the same time. These observations do not establish that dust inputs increase biological-pump efficiency or rapidly transfer new organic matter to higher trophic levels. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims. 21
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 8
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    From spring to summer, the dust plume shifts northward, linked to the shift of the ITCZ and the Harmattan winds into the Sahara and the development of the NW African monsoon.

    “From spring to summer, the dust plume shifts northward, linked to the shift of the Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) and the Harmattan winds into the Sahara and the development of the NW African monsoon (Tsamalis et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tsamalis et al., 2013 source

      Section 3.2 (Spring; page unavailable) reports a northward movement of the Saharan Air Layer, and Section 4.5 (page unavailable) connects its southern boundary to the ITCZ, which moves north over the Atlantic by summer. The cited passages do not link that movement to Harmattan winds moving into the Sahara or to development of the NW African monsoon. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Skipjack performs migratory movements conditioned by SST and prey availability.

    “It typically preys on small (2-5 cms) pelagic fishes, crustaceans and cephalopods (Magnuson, 1969;Roger, 1994;Druon et al., 2017), and performs migratory movements conditioned by SST and preys availability (Arrizabalaga et al., 2015;Druon et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Arrizabalaga et al., 2015 source

      Section 2.1 (page unavailable) includes skipjack among highly migratory tunas, and the Discussion (page unavailable) says tunas make trophic migrations to exploit productive areas. The paper also models skipjack habitat in relation to surface temperature, but it does not establish that skipjack’s migratory movements specifically are conditioned by both SST and prey availability. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Druon et al., 2017 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Skipjack tuna inhabits warm waters, preferably those with a sea surface temperature (SST) between 20 and 28°C.

    “Skipjack tuna inhabits warm waters, preferably those with a sea surface temperature (SST) between 20 and 28 • C (Arrizabalaga et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Arrizabalaga et al., 2015 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    During this northward migration, skipjack schools agglomerate in areas with high feeding resources, where they are caught in abundance.

    “During this northward migration, skipjack schools agglomerate in areas with high feeding resources (Druon et al., 2017), where they are caught in abundance (Evans et al., 1981;Fonteneau, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Druon et al., 2017 source
    • cites Evans et al., 1981

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Fonteneau, 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These inputs enhance, deplete and/or modify the composition of the phytoplankton communities.

    “These inputs enhance, deplete and/or modifying the composition of the phytoplankton communities (Mahowald et al., 2018;Hettiarachchi et al., 2021;Zhang et al., 2022;Herut et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Mahowald et al., 2018 source
    • cites Hettiarachchi et al., 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Zhang et al., 2022 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Large amounts of industrial, urban and wildfire pyrogenic and acid aerosols are being globally deposited in the ocean.

    “Studies have shown that large amounts of industrial, urban and wildfire pyrogenic and acid aerosols are being globally deposited in the ocean (Ito et al., 2019;Rodríguez et al., 2021;Tang et al., 2021;Hamilton et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ito et al., 2019 source

      The Results and Discussion section (page unavailable) models combustion-derived iron deposition to the ocean, including a global-mean contribution of 2.6–7.1% of total iron deposition, and discusses biomass-burning and coal-combustion sources. The paper discusses acid processing of aerosols, but the cited passages do not establish that large amounts of acid aerosols themselves are deposited globally in the ocean; the deposition estimates concern iron, not aerosols as a whole. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Rodríguez et al., 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Hamilton et al., 2022 source

      The Introduction describes oceans as a major sink for airborne nutrients and pollutants, while ‘Anthropocene Perturbations to Aerosol Nutrient Sources’ links industrial and transport emissions to increasing marine deposition. The aerosol-nutrients section also describes wildfire plumes and acid-coated particles reaching the surface ocean. The paper does not establish that large amounts of each specified aerosol type, particularly urban and acid aerosols, are being deposited globally. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The NE Atlantic is the major global receptor of desert dust, about 45% of the global desert dust inputs to the ocean (450 Tg/y) occurs in this region.

    “The NE Atlantic is the major global receptor of desert dust, about the 45% of the global desert dust inputs to the ocean (450 Tg/y) occurs in this region (Mahowald et al., 2005;Huneeus et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Mahowald et al., 2005 source

      Table 1 (section 5, page not available) gives composite dust deposition of 202 Tg/year to the North Atlantic, the largest listed ocean basin. The listed basin totals sum to 438 Tg/year, so the North Atlantic receives about 46% of that total—close to the claimed 45% of roughly 450 Tg/year. The table does not isolate the northeastern Atlantic, so it does not support assigning that share to that region specifically. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Huneeus et al., 2011 source

      Section 2.1 discusses dust deposition to the Atlantic Ocean, and Section 4.2 describes dust transport from West Africa across the Atlantic. Neither passage establishes that the NE Atlantic is the largest global receptor or that it receives 45% (450 Tg/year) of global desert-dust inputs to the ocean. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Off NW Africa, chlorophyll-rich waters are observed off Guinea to Mauritania, a region that receives nutrients from the easterly boundary upwelling linked to the Canary Current, the Guinea Dome, and massive deposition of Saharan desert dust.

    “Off NW Africa, chlorophyll-rich waters are observed off Guinea to Mauritania (Fig. 1E), a region that receives nutrients of the easterly boundary upwelling linked to the Canary Current (Arístegui et al., 2009;Cropper et al., 2014;Valdés and Déniz-González, 2015;Nieto and Mélin, 2017) (Fig. 1G), of the Guinea Dome (Doi et al., 2009), and by massive deposition of Saharan desert dust (Fig. 1C-D).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Desert dust emitted in the Sahara is transported to low latitudes during boreal winter, affecting the Gulf of Guinea and equatorial Atlantic, including waters (<5°N) off Gabon, Benin, Togo, Ghana, Côte d'Ivoire and Liberia, to Guinea, where high dust loads are airborne from December to February.

    “Desert dust emitted in the Sahara is transported to low latitudes during boreal winter, affecting the Gulf of Guinea and the equatorial Atlantic, including waters (<5 • N) off Gabon, Benin, Togo, Ghana, Côte d'Ivoire and Liberia, to Guinea (Fig. 2C3), where high dust loads are airborne from December to February (red circles in Fig. 2A7-2A8).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In SW Africa, a large skipjack fishing ground is located off Angola, where nutrients arrive from upwelling-waters and dust deposition from the southern Angolan and Namibian deserts.

    “In SW Africa, a large skipjack fishing ground is located off Angola (Fig. 1E), where nutrients arrive from upwelling-waters (Fig. 1G) and dust deposition from the southern Angolan and Namibian deserts (Dansie et al., 2017) (Fig. 1C).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In winter, skipjack is mainly caught in the dust wet deposition band (5°N-5°S) and secondarily at northern latitudes between Cabo Verde and Senegal (~17°N) in waters affected by massive dust dry deposition.

    “In winter, skipjack is mainly caught in the dust wet deposition band (5 • N-5 • S; Fig. 3A1-3C1; Fig. S4) and, secondarily, at northern latitudes between Cabo Verde and Senegal (~17 • N, Fig. 3A1) in waters affected by massive dust dry deposition (see asterisk in Fig. 3A1, 3B1 and 3D1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the skipjack fishing grounds off Togo, Benin and Cape Lopez (Gabon), no correlation is found between dust and skipjack catches, indicating that the nutrients supporting phytoplankton and zooplankton in these regions are linked to other sources than dust, e.g. river discharge or upwellings.

    “In the skipjack fishing grounds located off Togo, Benin and Cape Lopez (Gabon), no correlation is found between dust and skipjack catches Fig. 2A7-2A8, indicating that the nutrients supporting phytoplankton and zooplankton in these regions are linked to other sources than dust, e.g.river discharge (Vieira et al., 2020) or upwellings (Friedlander et al., 2014;Radenac et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The major skipjack fishing grounds (annual catches >500 tonnes/year) are located in NW Africa off Mauritania, Senegal and from Liberia to Guinea; in SW Africa off Angola; and in Equatorial Atlantic waters and from Côte d'Ivoire to Benin and Gabon.

    “The major skipjack fishing grounds (annual catches >500 tonnes/ year) are located in (i) NW Africa, off Mauritania (M), Senegal (S) and from Liberia to Guinea (LG), (ii) in South West (SW) Africa, off Angola (A), and (iii) in Equatorial Atlantic (EQA) waters and from Côte d'Ivoire to Benin (CB) and Gabon (G); see (M, S, LG, A, EQA, CB and GT) in Fig. 1A2.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    During the spring to summer northward migration, skipjack catches are high in April-May off Liberia to Guinea (5-10°N), from June to September off Senegal (15°N), in July and August off Mauritania (15-21°N) and in the Canary Islands (28°N).

    “During the spring to summer northward migration, skipjack catches are high in April-May in open waters off Liberia to Guinea (5-10 • N, Fig. 2A4, 2B2 and 2C2), from June to September in open waters off Senegal (15 • N, Fig. 2A3) and in July and August in open waters off Mauritania (15-21 • N, Fig. 2A2-2B1) and in the Canary Islands (28 • N, Fig. 2A1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The observed long-term associations of skipjack catch with the seasonal cycles, anomalies and meridional variability of dust over the North-East Atlantic show that along the year skipjack catches mainly occur in waters affected by massive dust deposition linked to dust wet deposition in tropical waters and dust dry deposition in the Saharan desert-dust outflow.

    “The observed long-term associations of skipjack catch with the seasonal cycles, anomalies and meridional variability of dust over the North-East Atlantic, shows that along the year skipjack catches mainly occur in waters affected by massive dust deposition linked (i) to dust wet deposition in tropical waters and (ii) to dust dry deposition in the Saharan desert-dust outflow.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The northward migratory movement of skipjack tends to occur in waters underlying the SAL dust plume, and skipjack catches are abundant in waters fertilized by massive dust deposition.

    “We found that this northward migratory movement tends to occur in waters underlying the SAL dust plume, and that skipjack catches are abundant in waters fertilized by massive dust deposition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    In the last decade, catches in the Eastern Atlantic have accounted for ~89% of total Atlantic catches, a data that highlights the large skipjack biomass off Western Africa, supported by dust fertilization.

    “Indeed, in the last decade catches in the Eastern Atlantic have accounted for ~89% of total Atlantic catches, a data that highlights the large skipjack biomass off Western Africa, supported by dust fertilization.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Along the year, skipjack catches mainly occur in waters affected by massive dust deposition, at equatorial latitudes in winter, off Liberia to Guinea (5-10°N) in spring and off Mauritania to the Canary Islands (17-30°N) in summer.

    “Along the year, skipjack catches mainly occur in waters affected by massive dust deposition, at equatorial latitudes in winter, off Liberia to Guinea (5-10 • N) in spring and off Mauritania to the Canary Islands (17-30 • N) in summer.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Atmospheric deposition of dust in the open ocean and in upwelling waters contributes to support zooplankton-rich areas, which are optimal for feeding small fish, molluscs and cephalopods, and suitable for feeding large predators, as skipjacks, where they are caught in abundance.

    “Atmospheric deposition of dust in the open ocean and in upwelling waters contributes to support zooplankton-rich areas, which are optimal for feeding small fish, molluscs and cephalopods, and suitable for feeding large predators, as skipjacks, where they are caught in abundance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The well-known skipjack seasonal migrations between Gabon and Angola may be supported by dust deposition added to the effects of the Angolan wind-driven upwelling, with a pattern that resembles that described for NW Africa.

    “This suggests that the well-known skipjack seasonal migrations between Gabon and Angola (Dansie et al., 2017;Huntley, 2019) may be supported by dust deposition added to the effects of the Angolan wind-driven upwelling (Fig. 2A9, 2B3 and 2C3), with a pattern that resembles that described above for NW Africa.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The role of dust as fertilizing and supporter of phytoplankton and zooplankton rich areas also has implications for other species of fishing interest, including other tropical tuna (e.g. bigeye and yellowfin), which are often exploited simultaneously with skipjack by the same fisheries.

    “The role of dust as fertilizing and supporter of phytoplankton and zooplankton rich areas also has implications for other species of fishing interest, including other tropical tuna (e.g.bigeye and yellowfin), which are often exploited simultaneously with skipjack by the same fisheries.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Skipjack subtropical feeding areas are located at about 25°S off Angola and within 10-40°N off NW Africa, whereas spawning regions are in warm equatorial waters (SST >24°) between 4°N and 2°S.

    “Their subtropical feeding areas are located in regions at about 25 • S, off Angola, and within 10-40 • N off NW Africa, whereas the spawning regions are in warm equatorial waters (at SST higher than 24 • ) between 4 • N and 2 • S.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A large stock of skipjacks is located in the warm waters of the Gulf of Guinea and the central equatorial Atlantic, its main spawning area, where skipjack catches are abundant throughout the year.

    “A large stock of skipjacks is located in the warm waters of the Gulf of Guinea and the central equatorial Atlantic (Evans et al., 1981) (Fig. 1A2), its main spawning area, where the skipjack catches are abundant throughout the year.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Evans et al., 1981

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The role of dust in fertilizing and supporting phytoplankton- and zooplankton-rich areas also has implications for other tropical tuna, such as bigeye and yellowfin, which are often exploited simultaneously with skipjack by the same fisheries.

    “The role of dust in fertilizing and supporting phytoplankton-and zooplankton-rich areas also has implications for other tropical tuna, such as bigeye and yellowfin, which are often exploited simultaneously with skipjack by the same fisheries (see Fig. S1 and S5 of the Supplementary Information).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    Variability in dust inputs may also influence the behaviour of skipjack schools by still unknown patterns.

    “This finding suggests that variability in dust inputs may also influences on the behaviour of skipjack schools by still unknown patterns.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Atmospheric deposition of desert dust in the ocean influences the composition and growth of phytoplankton, generating new organic matter that is distributed across the food chain.

    “Previous studies found that the atmospheric deposition of desert dust in the ocean influence on the composition and growth of phytoplankton, generating new organic matter that is distributed across the food chain.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In addition to coastal upwellings, Saharan dust deposition contributes to support zooplankton-rich areas, optimal for feeding small fish, molluscs and cephalopods, and suitable for feeding large predators, thus affecting the migrations of skipjack tuna.

    “In addition to coastal upwellings, Saharan dust deposition contributes to support zooplankton-rich areas, optimal for feeding small fish, molluscs and cephalopods, and suitable for feeding large predators, thus affecting on the migrations of skipjack tuna.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    During the Atlantic-Saharan migration, skipjack schools agglomerate in specific marine areas with high feeding resources, often linked to two key nutrient supplies: massive desert dust deposition, including deposition on upwelled waters, pointing to a strong coupling between aeolian dust inputs and the efficiency of the biological pump to rapidly transfer new organic matter to higher trophic level

    “key nutrients supplies, massive desert dust deposition, including deposition on upwelled waters, pointing to a strong coupling between aeolian dust inputs and the efficiency of the biological pump to rapidly transfer new organic matter to higher trophic levels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
28 of 28
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Commercial skipjack catch data reliably indicate skipjack presence, migration and abundance.

    “In our analysis we plotted the monthly skipjack catches (Fig. 2B1-2B3; Fig. 3B1-3B4 and Fig. S4).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Skipjack catches per fishing hour in FAD are a valid measure of skipjack abundance.

    “skipjack catches per fishing hour (a measure of skipjack abundance) in Floating Aggregating Devices (FAD)”
2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Figure 2 gives a different averaging period

    Minor

    The Figure 2 caption gives the monthly-average period as 20014-2019, whereas the Methods state that monthly mean values were analysed for 2014-2019.

  • Figure 3 caption omits the autumn panels

    Minor

    The caption lists January, April and August as the months shown, but the results describe autumn data in Figure 3's fourth set of panels.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Barkley, 1978, Skipjack tuna, Katsuwonus Pelamis, habitat based on temperature and oxigen requirements, Fish. Bull., 76
  2. Fonteneau, 2015, On the movement patterns and stock structure of skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis) in the Atlantic: how many skipjack stocks in the Atlantic Ocean?, Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 71, 205

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodríguez, S., Riera, R., Fonteneau, A., Alonso-Pérez, S., & López-Darias, J.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ES)
  • Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
  • Universidad de La Laguna (ES)
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Venue
Atmospheric Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
312
Pages
120022
ISSN
1352-2310 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385779597
Cited by
23
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Atmospheric Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Acceda (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (MERRA-2)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (PGC 2018)
  • Cabildo de Tenerife
  • European Regional Development Fund (PGC2018)
  • Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Keywords
Saharan dust, skipjack tuna, fish migration, fisheries, iron accumulation, phytoplankton, zooplankton, Northeast Atlantic, Mauritania, Canary Islands, upwelling, fisheries management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-16.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-16.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review