The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Statistical downscaling of precipitation using machine learning techniques
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Statistical models were developed for downscaling reanalysis data to monthly precipitation at 48 observation stations scattered across the Australian State of Victoria belonging to wet, intermediate and dry climate regimes. Downscaling models were calibrated over the period 1950–1991 and validated over the period 1992–2014 for each calendar month, for each station, using 4 machine learning techniques, (1) Genetic Programming (GP), (2) Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), (3) Support Vector Machine (SVM), and (4) Relevance Vector Machine (RVM). It was found that, irrespective of the climate regime and the machine learning technique, downscaling models tend to better simulate the average (compared to other statistics) and under-estimate the standard deviation and the maximum of the observed precipitation. Also, irrespective of the climate regime and the machine learning technique, at the majority of stations downscaling models showed an over-estimating trend of low to mid percentiles (i.e. below the 50th percentile) of precipitation and under-estimating trend of high percentiles of precipitation (i.e. above the 90th percentile). The over-estimating trend of low to mid percentiles of precipitation was more pronounced at stations located in dryer climate, irrespective of the machine learning technique. Based on the results of this investigation the use of RVM or ANN over SVM or GP for developing downscaling models can be recommended for a study such as flood prediction which involves the consideration of high extremes of precipitation. Also, RVM can be recommended over GP, ANN or SVM in developing downscaling models for a study such as drought analysis which involves the consideration of low extremes of precipitation. Furthermore, it was found that irrespective of the climate regime, the SVM and RVM-based precipitation downscaling models showed the best performance with the Polynomial kernel.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
Wu, Y. (1999) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1999.10485951 · Cited by 27,221
Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques
(2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-19715-5 · Cited by 25,437
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3264-1 · Cited by 10,696
Neural Networks And Learning Machines
Haykin, S. (2010) · Cited by 6,609
Hagan, M., Demuth, H. B., Beale, M. H., & Jes?s, O. D. (2016) · Institutional Repository of the National University Open and Distance UNAD (Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia) · Cited by 5,133
Leys, C., Ley, C., Klein, O., Bernard, P., & Licata, L. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.013 · Cited by 4,147
The Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project
Compo, G. P., Whitaker, J. S., Sardeshmukh, P. D., Matsui, N., Allan, R. J., Yin, X., Gleason, B. E., Vose, R. S., Rutledge, G., Bessemoulin, P., et al. (2011) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.776 · Cited by 3,518
Agatonovic-Kustrin, S., & Beresford, R. (2000) · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis · doi:10.1016/s0731-7085(99)00272-1 · Cited by 1,957
Kernel methods in machine learning
Hofmann, T., Schölkopf, B., & Smola, A. J. (2008) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053607000000677 · Cited by 1,651
Cited by
Multi-model ensemble predictions of precipitation and temperature using machine learning algorithms
Ahmed, K., Sachindra, D. A., Shahid, S., Iqbal, Z., Nawaz, N., & Khan, N. (2020) · Atmospheric Research · doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104806 · Cited by 295
Self-citationPredicting Standardized Streamflow index for hydrological drought using machine learning models
Shamshirband, S., Hashemi, S., Salimi, H., Samadianfard, S., Asadi, E., Shadkani, S., Kargar, K., Mosavi, A., Nabipour, N., & Chau, K.-W. (2020) · Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1080/19942060.2020.1715844 · Cited by 292
Configuration and intercomparison of deep learning neural models for statistical downscaling
Baño-Medina, J., Manzanas, R., & Gutiérrez, J. M. (2020) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-13-2109-2020 · Cited by 282
A review of Earth Artificial Intelligence
Sun, Z., Sandoval, L., Crystal-Ornelas, R., Mousavi, S. M., Wang, J., Lin, C., Cristea, N., Tong, D., Carande, W. H., Ma, X., et al. (2022) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105034 · Cited by 271
Salman, S. A., Shahid, S., Ismail, T., Ahmed, K., & Wang, X.-J. (2018) · Atmospheric Research · doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.07.008 · Cited by 195
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sachindra, D. A., Ahmed, K., Rashid, M. M., Shahid, S., & Perera, B. J. C.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 212
- Pages
- 240-258
- ISSN
- 0169-8095 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2807107999
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 12.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical downscaling of precipitation using machine learning techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.05.022
- The paper
- Sachindra, D. A., Ahmed, K., Rashid, M. M., Shahid, S., & Perera, B. J. C. (2018). Statistical downscaling of precipitation using machine learning techniques. Atmospheric Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.05.022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.