The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Configuration and intercomparison of deep learning neural models for statistical downscaling
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Deep learning techniques (in particular convolutional neural networks, CNNs) have recently emerged as a promising approach for statistical downscaling due to their ability to learn spatial features from huge spatiotemporal datasets. However, existing studies are based on complex models, applied to particular case studies and using simple validation frameworks, which makes a proper assessment of the (possible) added value offered by these techniques difficult. As a result, these models are usually seen as black boxes, generating distrust among the climate community, particularly in climate change applications. In this paper we undertake a comprehensive assessment of deep learning techniques for continental-scale statistical downscaling, building on the VALUE validation framework. In particular, different CNN models of increasing complexity are applied to downscale temperature and precipitation over Europe, comparing them with a few standard benchmark methods from VALUE (linear and generalized linear models) which have been traditionally used for this purpose. Besides analyzing the adequacy of different components and topologies, we also focus on their extrapolation capability, a critical point for their potential application in climate change studies. To do this, we use a warm test period as a surrogate for possible future climate conditions. Our results show that, while the added value of CNNs is mostly limited to the reproduction of extremes for temperature, these techniques do outperform the classic ones in the case of precipitation for most aspects considered. This overall good performance, together with the fact that they can be suitably applied to large regions (e.g., continents) without worrying about the spatial features being considered as predictors, can foster the use of statistical approaches in international initiatives such as Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science
Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J., Carvalhais, N., & Prabhat (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1 · Cited by 5,673
Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models
Rasp, S., Pritchard, M. S., & Gentine, P. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1810286115 · Cited by 1,044
Statistical downscaling of general circulation model output: A comparison of methods
Wilby, R. L., Wigley, T. M. L., Conway, D., Jones, P. D., Hewitson, B. C., Main, J., & Wilks, D. S. (1998) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/98wr02577 · Cited by 868
Downscaling of precipitation for climate change scenarios: A support vector machine approach
Tripathi, S., Srinivas, V. V., & Nanjundiah, R. S. (2006) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.030 · Cited by 607
Statistical Downscaling and Bias Correction for Climate Research
Maraun, D., & Widmann, M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107588783 · Cited by 548
Could Machine Learning Break the Convection Parameterization Deadlock?
Gentine, P., Pritchard, M., Rasp, S., Reinaudi, G., & Yacalis, G. (2018) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2018gl078202 · Cited by 497
WCRP COordinated Regional Downscaling EXperiment (CORDEX): a diagnostic MIP for CMIP6
Gutowski Jr., W. J., Giorgi, F., Timbal, B., Frigon, A., Jacob, D., Kang, H.-S., Raghavan, K., Lee, B., Lennard, C., Nikulin, G., et al. (2016) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-9-4087-2016 · Cited by 462
Statistical downscaling of precipitation using machine learning techniques
Sachindra, D. A., Ahmed, K., Rashid, M. M., Shahid, S., & Perera, B. J. C. (2018) · Atmospheric Research · doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.05.022 · Cited by 373
Gutiérrez, J. M., Maraun, D., Widmann, M., Huth, R., Hertig, E., Benestad, R., Roessler, O., Wibig, J., Wilcke, R., Kotlarski, S., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.5462 · Cited by 320
Self-citation
Cited by
Machine Learning Methods in Weather and Climate Applications: A Survey
Chen, L., Han, B., Wang, X., Zhao, J., Yang, W., & Yang, Z. (2023) · doi:10.20944/preprints202309.1764.v2 · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- Baño-Medina, J., Manzanas, R., & Gutiérrez, J. M.
- Venue
- Geoscientific Model Development
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2020-04-28
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2109-2124
- ISSN
- 1991-959X (ISSN-L)
- 1991-9603
- OpenAlex
- W2981977644
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 13.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Configuration and intercomparison of deep learning neural models for statistical downscaling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/gmd-13-2109-2020
- The paper
- Baño-Medina, J., Manzanas, R., & Gutiérrez, J. M. (2020). Configuration and intercomparison of deep learning neural models for statistical downscaling. Geoscientific Model Development. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2109-2020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.