The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Road dust resuspension: A review
Open accessAbstract
Abstract In the last decades, emissions from road traffic saw a significant drop due to the stricter regulations for the motor vehicles’ exhaust and cleaner technologies for fleets. Therefore, non-tailpipe emissions should be increasingly held responsible for traffic-related emissions, including brake-, tyre- and road-wear particles, as well as vehicle-induced resuspension of road dust deposited on the surface. Nevertheless, the quantification of road dust resuspension is still lacking a standardised sampling procedure, leading to a doubtful integration in emission inventories. This article aims at presenting the various methodologies that were so far developed to collect road dust, ranging from the most rudimental scoop sweeping until more sophisticated devices with size-selective inlets to capture the more worrisome fraction: the inhalable resuspended particulate matter. The different methodologies for sampling and calculating emission factors are critically reviewed. Sources that contribute to the road dust and their implications on the particle size distributions and chemical composition are discussed. Easily applicable indexes to quantify the magnitude of pollution of road dust are presented. Emission factors and physicochemical profiles of road dust are necessary towards a more accurate inclusion of this specific non-exhaust category in emission inventories, receptor modelling and health protection programmes by policymakers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Composition of the Continental Crust
Rudnick, R. L., & Gao, S. (2014) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-095975-7.00301-6 · Cited by 5,691
(2014) · doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3696-8 · Cited by 946
Metal emissions from road traffic and the influence of resuspension—results from two tunnel studies
Sternbeck, J., Sjödin, Å., & Andréasson, K. (2002) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(02)00561-7 · Cited by 815
Abbasi, S., Keshavarzi, B., Moore, F., Turner, A., Kelly, F. J., Dominguez, A. O., & Jaafarzadeh, N. (2019) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.039 · Cited by 770
Source characterisation of road dust based on chemical and mineralogical composition
Gunawardana, C., Goonetilleke, A., Egodawatta, P., Dawes, L., & Kokot, S. (2012) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.12.012 · Cited by 357
Particle toxicology and health - where are we?
Riediker, M., Zink, D., Kreyling, W., Oberdörster, G., Elder, A., Graham, U., Lynch, I., Duschl, A., Ichihara, G., Ichihara, S., et al. (2019) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/s12989-019-0302-8 · Cited by 237
Cited by
Fussell, J. C., Franklin, M., Green, D. C., Gustafsson, M., Harrison, R. M., Hicks, W., Kelly, F. J., Kishta, F., Miller, M. R., Mudway, I. S., et al. (2022) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c01072 · Cited by 466
Yoo, H., Park, P., Le, Y. T.-H., Park, S., Jung, Y.-W., Youn, J.-S., Kim, Y.-M., & Jeon, K.-J. (2025) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126991 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Casotti Rienda, I., & Alves, C. A.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-10
- Volume
- 261
- Pages
- 105740
- ISSN
- 0169-8095 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3176953824
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 9.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Road dust resuspension: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105740
- The paper
- Casotti Rienda, I., & Alves, C. A. (2021). Road dust resuspension: A review. Atmospheric Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105740
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
