The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring how information exchanges can be enhanced through Cloud BIM
Open accessAbstract
The properties of BIM are; parametric modelling providing tabular views of components and characteristic interaction with elements, for example if a pitch roof changes so do the walls and bi-directional co-ordination enabling virtual simulations of physical construction. However, the dilemma is how to share these properties of BIM applications on one single platform. Thus creating a service that would enable the end-user to use multiple of nDs such as, 3D (three dimensional modelling), 4D (time - programming), 5D (costing) and 6D (sustainability) actions asynchronously. The prospect of using remote data servers with web service applications provides a mechanism for exchanging data openly. The main exchange format for BIM files is Industry Foundation Classes (IFCs). However, the initial problem with IFCs is that they are not intended to store and carry all relevant data for all multi-featured construction processes. Furthermore, not all relevant data can be structured in a single super schema. This papers' methodology focuses on the results of a semi-structured interview of 11 expert respondents, on using cloud computing as integration platform for BIM applications ‘Cloud BIM’. The proposed model is not to introduce a new schema in contrast to IFC but to harness the capability of IFC XML and or possibly engage with using Simplified Markup Language (SML) subsets of eXtensible Markup Language (XML) for exchanging partial data to design an integrated platform that would enhance the BIM usability experience for various disciplines in making key design decisions at a relatively early design stage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Eastman, C., Teicholz, P. M., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2008) · Cited by 2,892
Wang, X. (2012) · Construction Economics and Building · doi:10.5130/ajceb.v12i3.2749 · Cited by 1,495
What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education
Anderson, P. F. (2007) · Cited by 1,180
Weinstein, B. D. (1993) · Metamedicine · doi:10.1007/bf00993988 · Cited by 103
Cited by
Big Data in the construction industry: A review of present status, opportunities, and future trends
Bilal, M., Oyedele, L. O., Qadir, J., Munir, K., Ajayi, S. O., Akinade, O. O., Owolabi, H. A., Alaka, H. A., & Pasha, M. (2016) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2016.07.001 · Cited by 734
Building Information Modeling (BIM) for green buildings: A critical review and future directions
Lu, Y., Wu, Z., Chang, R., & Li, Y. (2017) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.024 · Cited by 555
Chi, H.-L., Kang, S.-C., & Wang, X. (2013) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2012.12.017 · Cited by 476
Potentials of Blockchain Technology for Construction Management
Turk, Ž., & Klinc, R. (2017) · Procedia Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.052 · Cited by 459
Cloud computing in construction industry: Use cases, benefits and challenges
Bello, S. A., Oyedele, L. O., Akinade, O. O., Bilal, M., Davila Delgado, J. M., Akanbi, L. A., Ajayi, A. O., & Owolabi, H. A. (2021) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103441 · Cited by 452
Metadata
- Authors
- Redmond, A., Hore, A., Alshawi, M., & West, R.
- Venue
- Automation in Construction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 24
- Pages
- 175-183
- ISSN
- 0926-5805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970457529
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 36.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring how information exchanges can be enhanced through Cloud BIM. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.02.003
- The paper
- Redmond, A., Hore, A., Alshawi, M., & West, R. (2012). Exploring how information exchanges can be enhanced through Cloud BIM. Automation in Construction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.02.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.