The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Potentials of Blockchain Technology for Construction Management
Open accessAbstract
Blockchain technology enables distributed, encrypted and secure logging of digital transactions. It is the underlying technology of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. Blockchain is expected to revolutionize computing in several areas, particularly where centralization was unnatural and privacy was important. In the paper, we present research on where and how this technology could be useful in the construction industry. The work is based on the study of literature on open issues that exist in construction process management. These are than matched to the capabilities of blockchain. We are motivated by the fact that construction projects involve a dynamic grouping of several companies. We study the degree to which the relationships among them are hierarchical or peer-to-peer and note that particularly in information intensive phases, centralization of information management was necessary because of technology. When using un-constraining technology, communication patterns among participants show a peer-to-peer nature of the relationships. In such environment, blockchain can provide a trustworthy infrastructure for information management during all building life-cycle stages. Even if building information modelling (BIM) is used, which assumes a centralized building information model, there is a role for blockchain to manage information on who did what and when and thus provide a basis for any legal arguments that might occur. On the construction site blockchain can improve the reliability and trustworthiness of construction logbooks, works performed and material quantities recorded. In the facility maintenance phase, blockchain's main potential is the secure storage of sensor data which are sensitive to privacy. We conclude that blockchain provides solutions to many current problems in construction information management. However, it is more likely that it will be built into generic IT infrastructure on top of which construction applications are built, rather than used directly by authors of construction related software. It has a potential to make construction processes less centralized which opens needs for research in that direction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
Squarepants, S. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3977007 · Cited by 11,148
Eastman, C., Teicholz, P. M., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2008) · Cited by 2,892
Exploring how information exchanges can be enhanced through Cloud BIM
Redmond, A., Hore, A., Alshawi, M., & West, R. (2012) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2012.02.003 · Cited by 281
Kakavand, H., Kost De Sevres, N., & Chilton, B. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2849251 · Cited by 232
Blockchain Technology: What is it Good for?Preprint
Ammous, S. H. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2832751 · Cited by 111
Ten questions concerning building information modelling
Turk, Ž. (2016) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.08.001 · Cited by 109
Self-citationHollywood: a business model for the future?
Grantham, C. E. (2000) · ACM SIGCPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research (SIGCPR) · doi:10.1145/333334.333337 · Cited by 3
Cited by
Casino, F., Dasaklis, T. K., & Patsakis, C. (2019) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.006 · Cited by 2,557
Pan, Y., & Zhang, L. (2021) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103517 · Cited by 1,336
RETRACTED: Cryptocurrencies as a financial asset: A systematic analysis
Corbet, S., Lucey, B., Urquhart, A., & Yarovaya, L. (2019) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2018.09.003 · Cited by 1,172
RetractedLi, J., Greenwood, D., & Kassem, M. (2019) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2019.02.005 · Cited by 665
Leveraging the Internet of Things and Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management
Rejeb, A., Keogh, J. G., & Treiblmaier, H. (2019) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi11070161 · Cited by 538
Metadata
- Authors
- Turk, Ž., & Klinc, R.
- Venue
- Procedia Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 196
- Pages
- 638-645
- ISSN
- 1877-7058 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2746876422
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 26.90
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Potentials of Blockchain Technology for Construction Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.052
- The paper
- Turk, Ž., & Klinc, R. (2017). Potentials of Blockchain Technology for Construction Management. Procedia Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.052
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.