The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Underground sewer pipe condition assessment based on convolutional neural networks
Abstract
Abstract Surveys for assessing the condition of sewer pipeline systems are mainly based on video surveillance or CCTV, which is a time-consuming process that relies heavily on human labor because an operator has to watch videos, looks for defects and decides the defect's type manually. Previous research required suitable handcrafted features that were inefficient in analyzing sewer pipeline condition, so a robust and efficient framework is crucial as it eliminates the time-consuming tasks and helps the operator access condition of sewer systems more efficiently. This study proposes a defect classification system on CCTV inspection videos based on convolutional neural networks (CNN). The dataset was manually constructed and validated by extracting the images from CCTV videos, and the images were labeled according to six predefined defects. The CNN model was fine-tuned before training, and trained on a total of 47,072 images (256 × 256 pixels). The highest recorded accuracy was at 96.33%. As a result, the presented framework will motivate the finding of a more robust model that automatically and precisely evaluates the condition of sewer pipeline systems using CCTV and encourages the integration of the proposed model in real applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Deep Learning in Drug Discovery
Gawehn, E., Hiss, J. A., & Schneider, G. (2016) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201501008 · Cited by 723
CNN Features off-the-shelf: an Astounding Baseline for Recognition
Razavian, A. S., Azizpour, H., Sullivan, J., & Carlsson, S. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1403.6382 · Cited by 607
Cited by
Machine learning in natural and engineered water systems
Huang, R., Ma, C., Ma, J., Huangfu, X., & He, Q. (2021) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2021.117666 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Hassan, S. I., Dang, L. M., Mehmood, I., Im, S., Choi, C., Kang, J., Park, Y.-S., & Moon, H.
- Venue
- Automation in Construction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 106
- Pages
- 102849
- ISSN
- 0926-5805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2953888523
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Underground sewer pipe condition assessment based on convolutional neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102849
- The paper
- Hassan, S. I., Dang, L. M., Mehmood, I., Im, S., Choi, C., Kang, J., Park, Y.-S., & Moon, H. (2019). Underground sewer pipe condition assessment based on convolutional neural networks. Automation in Construction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102849
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.