The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blockchain-based framework for improving supply chain traceability and information sharing in precast construction
Abstract
Abstract Precast construction has great potential for driving innovations in clean, safe, high-efficient construction methods in the industry. However, current precast supply chain management often faces challenges such as fragmentation, poor traceability, and lack of real-time information. To address these challenges, this study builds a novel blockchain-based information management framework for a precast supply chain, which extends the applications of blockchain in the domain of construction supply chains. In this study, a blockchain framework and its development processes are presented in detail, and algorithms for smart contracts are developed for the model implementation. Finally, the performance of this framework is validated with a case study in which a visualization system is presented to achieve (1) information sharing management, (2) real-time control of scheduling, and (3) information traceability. The results suggest that the proposed framework facilitates the on-time delivery of precast components (PCs) and tracks the reasons for disputes centered on PCs in the precast supply chain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Blockchain technology: principles and applications
Pilkington, M. (2016) · Research Handbook on Digital Transformations · doi:10.4337/9781784717766.00019 · Cited by 1,627
Can blockchain strengthen the internet of things?
Kshetri, N. (2017) · IT Professional · doi:10.1109/mitp.2017.3051335 · Cited by 918
Cited by
Public and private blockchain in construction business process and information integration
Yang, R., Wakefield, R., Lyu, S., Jayasuriya, S., Han, F., Yi, X., Yang, X., Amarasinghe, G., & Chen, S. (2020) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103276 · Cited by 490
Lim, M. K., Li, Y., Wang, C., & Tseng, M.-L. (2021) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2021.107133 · Cited by 382
Wang, M., Wang, C. C., Sepasgozar, S., & Zlatanova, S. (2020) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings10110204 · Cited by 357
Bhushan, B., Khamparia, A., Sagayam, K. M., Sharma, S. K., Ahad, M. A., & Debnath, N. C. (2020) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102360 · Cited by 353
Exploratory literature review of blockchain in the construction industry
Scott, D. J., Broyd, T., & Ma, L. (2021) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103914 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Z., Wang, T., Hu, H., Gong, J., Ren, X., & Xiao, Q.
- Venue
- Automation in Construction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 111
- Pages
- 103063
- ISSN
- 0926-5805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2997365797
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 65.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blockchain-based framework for improving supply chain traceability and information sharing in precast construction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.103063
- The paper
- Wang, Z., Wang, T., Hu, H., Gong, J., Ren, X., & Xiao, Q. (2020). Blockchain-based framework for improving supply chain traceability and information sharing in precast construction. Automation in Construction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.103063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
