Psychogenic pseudosyncope: diagnosis and management
Abstract
Psychogenic pseudosyncope (PPS) is the appearance of transient loss of consciousness (TLOC) in the absence of true loss of consciousness. Psychiatrically, most cases are classified as conversion disorder, which is hypothesized to represent the physical manifestation of internal stressors. The incidence of PPS is likely under-recognized and the disorder is under investigated in the unexplained syncope population, yet it can be diagnosed accurately with a focused history and confirmed with investigations including head-up tilt testing (HUTT), electroencephalogram (EEG; sometimes combined with video) or, in some centers, transcranial Doppler (TCD). Patients are more likely to be young females with an increased number of episodes over the past 6months. They frequently experience symptoms prior to their episodes including light-headedness, shortness of breath and tingling. Conversion disorder is associated with symptomatic chronicity, increased psychiatric and physical impairment, and diminished quality of life. Understanding the epidemiology, biological underpinnings and approach to diagnosis of PPS is important to improve the recognition of this disorder so that patients may be managed appropriately. The general treatment approach involves limiting unnecessary interventions, providing the patient with needed structure, and encouraging functionality. While there are no treatment data available for patients with PPS, studies in related conversion disorder populations support the utility of psychotherapy. Psychotropic medications should be considered in patients with comorbid psychiatric disorders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The attack frequency in PPS is high, with several attacks occurring over a week or in a day.
“The attack frequency is high, with several attacks occurring over a week or in a day.”
From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [403]
There is usually no recognisable trigger, and no sweating, pallor, or nausea beforehand in PPS.
“There is usually no recognisable trigger, and no sweating, pallor, or nausea beforehand.”
From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [403]
In most cases, the duration of PPS is as short as in syncope, but a much longer duration is a useful diagnostic finding: patients may lie immobile on the floor for 15-30 min.
“In most cases, the duration of PPS is as short as in syncope, but a much longer duration is a useful diagnostic finding: patients may lie immobile on the floor for 15-30 min.”
From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [403]
The eyes are usually open in epileptic seizures and syncope but are usually closed in psychogenic TLOC.
“The eyes are usually open in epileptic seizures and syncope but are usually closed in psychogenic TLOC.”
From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [403]
Injury does not exclude PNES or PPS.
“Injury does not exclude PNES or PPS.”
From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [403]
The diagnosis of PPS rests on positive clues taken from the patient's history and from documenting normal EEG results, HR, or BP during an attack.
“The diagnosis of PPS rests on positive clues taken from the patient's history and from documenting normal EEG results, HR, or BP during an attack.”
From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [403]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 69
- Authors
- Raj, V., Rowe, A. A., Fleisch, S. B., Paranjape, S. Y., Arain, A. M., & Nicolson, S. E.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Raj, Vidya
- Venue
- Autonomic Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 184
- Pages
- 66-72
- ISSN
- 1566-0702 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1991624418
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Autonomic Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Keywords
- conversion disorder, transient loss of consciousness, unexplained syncope, head-up tilt, EEG, transcranial Doppler, psychotherapy, psychotropic drugs, psychiatric comorbidity, quality of life, under-recognition
- MeSH terms
- Conversion Disorder, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Somatoform Disorders, Syncope
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review