Cited by 19Vagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlStress Responses and Cortisol

Subdiaphragmatic vagotomy enhances stress-induced epinephrine release in rats

Mravec, Boris, Ondicova, Katarina, Tillinger, Andrej, Pecenak, Jan·2015·Autonomic Neuroscience

Abstract

Neuroendocrine stress response is regulated by several feedback loops. Since it has been suggested that afferent vagal pathways contribute to these feedback loops, we examined the effect of surgical subdiaphragmatic vagotomy on both baseline and stress-induced increases in plasma epinephrine, norepinephrine, and corticosterone levels in vagotomized and sham-operated Sprague Dawley rats. On either the 3rd or 14th day following vagotomy, the animals were exposed to acute immobilization stress and blood from the jugular vein was collected both before and during stress exposure. We found that vagotomy significantly enhanced immobilization-induced increases of plasma epinephrine, norepinephrine, and corticosterone levels on the 3rd day following surgery. However, on the 14th day following surgery, vagotomy enhanced only increase of plasma epinephrine levels in stressed rats. Our data indicate that afferent pathways of the vagus nerve are involved in negative feedback regulation of epinephrine secretion from the adrenal medulla during stressful conditions. We hypothesize that this feedback mechanism might be mediated by the binding of circulating epinephrine on β2-adrenergic receptors localized on sensory endings of the vagus nerve.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.autneu.2015.04.003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In rodents, vagotomy increases plasma epinephrine concentrations at baseline and after immobilization stress.

    “and increased epinephrine concentrations in plasma at baseline and after immobilization stress (Khasar et al., 2003;Mravec et al., 2015).”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Mravec et al., 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mravec, B., Ondicova, K., Tillinger, A., & Pecenak, J.
Affiliations
Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK)
Venue
Autonomic Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
190
Pages
20-25
ISSN
1566-0702 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081775897
Cited by
19
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 4
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autonomic Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • VEGA (2/0028/14, 1/0300/15)
  • APVV (0007/10)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
subdiaphragmatic vagotomy, neuroendocrine stress response, restraint stress, norepinephrine, corticosterone, adrenal medulla, negative feedback regulation, beta2-adrenergic receptor, sensory nerve endings, plasma catecholamines
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Weight, Corticosterone, Epinephrine, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Male, Norepinephrine, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Random Allocation, Restraint, Physical, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Vagotomy, Vagus Nerve, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Feedback, Physiological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review