Cited by 175Stress Responses and CortisolNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Neural Regulation of the Stress Response: The Many Faces of Feedback

Open access
Myers, Brent, McKlveen, Jessica M., Herman, James P.·2012·Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology

Abstract

The mammalian stress response is an integrated physiological and psychological reaction to real or perceived adversity. Glucocorticoids (GCs) are an important component of this response, acting to redistribute energy resources to both optimize survival in the face of challenge and restore homeostasis after the immediate threat has subsided. Release of GCs is mediated by the hypothalamo–pituitary–adrenocortical (HPA) axis, driven by a neural signal originating in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN). Stress levels of GCs bind to glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) in multiple body compartments, including brain, and consequently have wide-reaching actions. For this reason, GCs serve a vital function in feedback inhibition of their own secretion. Fast, non-genomic feedback inhibition of the HPA axis is mediated at least in part by GC signaling in the PVN, acting by a cannabinoid-dependent mechanism to rapidly reduce both neural activity and GC release. Delayed feedback termination of the HPA axis response is mediated by forebrain GRs, presumably by genomic mechanisms. GCs also act in the brainstem to attenuate neuropeptidergic excitatory input to the PVN via acceleration of mRNA degradation, providing a mechanism to attenuate future responses to stressors. Thus, rather than having a single defined feedback switch, GCs work through multiple neurocircuits and signaling mechanisms to coordinate HPA axis activity to suit the overall needs of multiple body systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10571-012-9801-y

Cites

152 of 152 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dysfunctional GCC signaling is implicated in chronic pain disorders, such as fibromyalgia and neuropathic pain, where alterations in GCC expression or sensitivity may influence the body's ability to control inflammation and modulate the nociceptive response.

    “Dysfunctional GCC signaling is implicated in chronic pain disorders, such as fibromyalgia and neuropathic pain, where alterations in GCC expression or sensitivity may influence the body’s ability to control inflammation and modulate the nociceptive response [135].”

    From The Role of Cortisol in Chronic Stress, Neurodegenerative Diseases, and Psychological Disorders (2023) · cites this paper as [135]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The GCC is essential for modulating the anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive actions of cortisol.

    “The GCC is essential for modulating the anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive actions of cortisol [135].”

    From The Role of Cortisol in Chronic Stress, Neurodegenerative Diseases, and Psychological Disorders (2023) · cites this paper as [135]

    The ‘Stress and the Hypothalamo-Pituitary-Adrenocortical axis’ section describes glucocorticoid feedback regulating HPA stress responses, not modulation of cortisol’s anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive actions. Searches for GCC, anti-inflammatory effects, and immunosuppression found no passage addressing that claim in our copy; page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Myers, B., McKlveen, J. M., & Herman, J. P.
Affiliations
University of Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
Myers, Brent
Venue
Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology
Published
2012-02-01
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
683-694
ISSN
  • 0272-4340 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6830
OpenAlex
W2004982081
Cited by
175
References
151
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH049698, R21MH090574, R01MH069860, R01MH069725)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32DK059803)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (T32NS007453)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
stress response, glucocorticoids, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, paraventricular nucleus, glucocorticoid receptor, cannabinoid signaling, mRNA degradation, neuropeptide signaling, homeostasis, brainstem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review