Cited by 22Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

Moving from the present to the future of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome – What we need

Open access
Raj, Satish R., Robertson, David·2018·Autonomic Neuroscience

Abstract

Our understanding about Postural Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) has advanced significantly over the last 25 years. Despite the significant advances that have been made in defining the syndrome and finding some treatments for our patients, there is much work to be done to significantly improve our understanding of the disorder and improve therapeutics. In this article, 5 NEEDS are identified that will be required over the next several years if we want future care to move beyond where we are in the present. These include: (1) a NEED for better administrative data to track POTS diagnoses and the impact of the illness; (2) a NEED to improve physician awareness about POTS, which is a prerequisite for improved access to care; (3) a NEED to better understand the multiple pathophysiologies underlying POTS and the roles of the different medical comorbidities; (4) a NEED for data on effective treatments for POTS; and (5) a NEED for more research funding to study POTS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.autneu.2018.06.007

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 22

Authors
Raj, S. R., & Robertson, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Raj, Satish R.
Venue
Autonomic Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
215
Pages
126-128
ISSN
1566-0702 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2811322829
Cited by
22
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autonomic Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Allergan
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1 TR000445)
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP142426)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research
  • GE Healthcare
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, administrative data, physician awareness, health care access, pathophysiology, comorbidities, research funding, future research priorities
MeSH terms
Humans, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review