The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconstruction-based contribution for process monitoring
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Process fault detection based on modeling and estimation methods—A survey
Isermann, R. (1984) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/0005-1098(84)90098-0 · Cited by 2,364
A survey of design methods for failure detection in dynamic systems
Willsky, A. S. (1976) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/0005-1098(76)90041-8 · Cited by 2,153
Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Engineering Systems
Gertler, J. J. (2017) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203756126 · Cited by 1,999
Statistical process monitoring: basics and beyond
Joe Qin, S. (2003) · Journal of Chemometrics · doi:10.1002/cem.800 · Cited by 1,582
Box, G. E. P. (1954) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728786 · Cited by 1,513
Multivariate SPC Charts for Monitoring Batch Processes
Nomikos, P., & MacGregor, J. F. (1995) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1995.10485888 · Cited by 1,422
A survey of design methods for failure detection in dynamic systems
(1977) · Microelectronics Reliability · doi:10.1016/0026-2714(77)90326-2 · Cited by 1,421
Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems
Braatz, L. H. C. (2001) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0957-0233/12/10/706 · Cited by 1,416
Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems
Chiang, L. H., Russell, E. L., & Braatz, R. D. (2001) · Advanced Textbooks in Control and Signal Processing · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0347-9 · Cited by 1,318
The process chemometrics approach to process monitoring and fault detection
Wise, B. M., & Gallagher, N. B. (1996) · Journal of Process Control · doi:10.1016/0959-1524(96)00009-1 · Cited by 852
Cited by
Wind Turbine Fault Detection Using a Denoising Autoencoder With Temporal Information
Jiang, G., Xie, P., He, H., & Yan, J. (2018) · IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · doi:10.1109/tmech.2017.2759301 · Cited by 288
Challenges in the Development of Soft Sensors for Bioprocesses: A Critical Review
Brunner, V., Siegl, M., Geier, D., & Becker, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.722202 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Alcala, C. F., & Qin, S. J.
- Venue
- Automatica
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1593-1600
- ISSN
- 0005-1098 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002268936
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 26.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconstruction-based contribution for process monitoring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.automatica.2009.02.027
- The paper
- Alcala, C. F., & Qin, S. J. (2009). Reconstruction-based contribution for process monitoring. Automatica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2009.02.027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
