The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distributed event-triggered coordination for average consensus on weight-balanced digraphs
Open accessAbstract
This paper proposes a novel distributed event-triggered algorithmic solution to the multi-agent average consensus problem for networks whose communication topology is described by weight-balanced, strongly connected digraphs. The proposed event-triggered communication and control strategy does not rely on individual agents having continuous or periodic access to information about the state of their neighbors. In addition, it does not require the agents to have a priori knowledge of any global parameter to execute the algorithm. We show that, under the proposed law, events cannot be triggered an infinite number of times in any finite period (i.e., no Zeno behavior), and that the resulting network executions provably converge to the average of the initial agents' states exponentially fast. We also provide weaker conditions on connectivity under which convergence is guaranteed when the communication topology is switching. Finally, we also propose and analyze a periodic implementation of our algorithm where the relevant triggering functions do not need to be evaluated continuously. Simulations illustrate our results and provide comparisons with other existing algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Olfati-Saber, R., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834113 · Cited by 12,788 · cited 2×
“It is well known [Olfati-Saber and Murray, 2004] that the distributed continuous control law ui(t) = − ∑ j∈N out i wij(xi(t)− xj(t)), (5) drives each agent of the system to asymptotically converge to the average of the agents’ initial conditions.”
Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems
Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J. A., & Murray, R. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2006.887293 · Cited by 10,522 · cited 2×
“The literature on multi-agent average consensus is vast, see e.g., [Olfati-Saber et al., 2007, Ren and Beard, 2008, Mesbahi and Egerstedt, 2010] and references therein.”
Graph Theoretic Methods in Multiagent Networks
Mesbahi, M., & Egerstedt, M. (2010) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400835355 · Cited by 2,897 · cited 1×
“The literature on multi-agent average consensus is vast, see e.g., [Olfati-Saber et al., 2007, Ren and Beard, 2008, Mesbahi and Egerstedt, 2010] and references therein.”
Distributed Consensus in Multi-vehicle Cooperative Control
Ren, W., & Beard, R. W. (2008) · Communications and Control Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-1-84800-015-5 · Cited by 2,826
Distributed event-triggered control for multi-agent systems
Dimarogonas, D. V., Frazzoli, E., & Johansson, K. H. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2011.2174666 · Cited by 2,556
Decentralised event-triggered cooperative control with limited communication
Garcia, E., Cao, Y., Yu, H., Antsaklis, P., & Casbeer, D. (2013) · International Journal of Control · doi:10.1080/00207179.2013.787647 · Cited by 228
Distributed Strategies for Generating Weight-Balanced and Doubly Stochastic Digraphs
Gharesifard, B., & Cortés, J. (2012) · European Journal of Control · doi:10.3166/ejc.18.539-557 · Cited by 171
Self-citation
Cited by
Kia, S. S., Cortés, J., & Martínez, S. (2015) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2015.03.001 · Cited by 694
Self-citationEvent-triggered communication and control of networked systems for multi-agent consensus
Nowzari, C., Garcia, E., & Cortés, J. (2019) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2019.03.009 · Cited by 655
Self-citationGe, X., Han, Q.-L., Ding, L., Wang, Y.-L., & Zhang, X.-M. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2020.3010825 · Cited by 565
Metadata
- Authors
- Nowzari, C., & Cortés, J.
- Venue
- Automatica
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-06
- Volume
- 68
- Pages
- 237-244
- ISSN
- 0005-1098 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2228259114
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 29.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.