The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic Event-Triggered Distributed Coordination Control and its Applications: A Survey of Trends and Techniques
Abstract
Distributed coordination control is the current trend in networked systems and finds prosperous applications across a variety of fields, such as smart grids and intelligent transportation systems. One fundamental issue in coordinating and controlling a large group of distributed and networked agents is the influence of intermittent interagent interactions caused by constrained communication resources. Event-triggered communication scheduling stands out as a promising enabler to strike a balance between the desired control performance and the satisfactory resource efficiency. What distinguishes dynamic event-triggered scheduling from traditional static event-triggered scheduling is that the triggering mechanism can be dynamically adjusted over time in accordance with both available system information and additional dynamic variables. This article provides an up-to-date overview of dynamic event-triggered distributed coordination control. The motivation of dynamic event-triggered scheduling is first introduced in the context of distributed coordination control. Then some techniques of dynamic event-triggered distributed coordination control are discussed in detail. Implementation and design issues are well addressed. Furthermore, this article exemplifies two applications of dynamic event-triggered distributed coordination control in the fields of microgrids and automated vehicles. Several challenges are suggested to direct the future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guerrero, J. M., Vasquez, J. C., Matas, J., de Vicuna, L. G., & Castilla, M. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2010.2066534 · Cited by 5,075
Distributed event-triggered control for multi-agent systems
Dimarogonas, D. V., Frazzoli, E., & Johansson, K. H. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2011.2174666 · Cited by 2,556
Event-triggered communication and control of networked systems for multi-agent consensus
Nowzari, C., Garcia, E., & Cortés, J. (2019) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2019.03.009 · Cited by 655
Decentralized event-triggered consensus for linear multi-agent systems under general directed graphs
Yang, D., Ren, W., Liu, X., & Chen, W. (2016) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2016.03.003 · Cited by 470
Security and Privacy Issues in Intelligent Transportation Systems: Classification and Challenges
Hahn, D., Munir, A., & Behzadan, V. (2021) · IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/mits.2019.2898973 · Cited by 183
Cited by
Observer-Based Event-Triggered Containment Control for MASs Under DoS Attacks
Ma, Y.-S., Che, W.-W., Deng, C., & Wu, Z.-G. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2021.3104178 · Cited by 205
Zhang, Z., Song, X., Sun, X., & Stojanovic, V. (2023) · International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing · doi:10.1002/acs.3529 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Ge, X., Han, Q.-L., Ding, L., Wang, Y.-L., & Zhang, X.-M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3112-3125
- ISSN
- 2168-2216 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-2232
- OpenAlex
- W3045516846
- Cited by
- 565
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 38.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic Event-Triggered Distributed Coordination Control and its Applications: A Survey of Trends and Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsmc.2020.3010825
- The paper
- Ge, X., Han, Q.-L., Ding, L., Wang, Y.-L., & Zhang, X.-M. (2020). Dynamic Event-Triggered Distributed Coordination Control and its Applications: A Survey of Trends and Techniques. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.2020.3010825
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
