The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Initialization-free distributed algorithms for optimal resource allocation with feasibility constraints and application to economic dispatch of power systems
Open accessAbstract
Abstract In this paper, the distributed resource allocation optimization problem is investigated. The allocation decisions are made to minimize the sum of all the agents’ local objective functions while satisfying both the global network resource constraint and the local allocation feasibility constraints. Here the data corresponding to each agent in this separable optimization problem, such as the network resources, the local allocation feasibility constraint, and the local objective function, is only accessible to individual agent and cannot be shared with others, which renders new challenges in this distributed optimization problem. Based on either projection or differentiated projection, two classes of continuous-time algorithms are proposed to solve this distributed optimization problem in an initialization-free and scalable manner. Thus, no re-initialization is required even if the operation environment or network configuration is changed, making it possible to achieve a “plug-and-play” optimal operation of networked heterogeneous agents. The algorithm convergence is guaranteed for strictly convex objective functions, and the exponential convergence is proved for strongly convex functions without local constraints. Then the proposed algorithm is applied to the distributed economic dispatch problem in power grids, to demonstrate how it can achieve the global optimum in a scalable way, even when the generation cost, or system load, or network configuration, is changing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Differential Inclusions: Set-Valued Maps and Viability Theory
Aubin, J.-P., & Cellina, A. (1984) · Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69512-4 · Cited by 3,393
Graph Theoretic Methods in Multiagent Networks
Mesbahi, M., & Egerstedt, M. (2010) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400835355 · Cited by 2,897 · cited 1×
“The following concepts of graph theory can be found in Mesbahi & Egerstedt (2010).”
BackgroundConstrained Consensus and Optimization in Multi-Agent Networks
Nedic, A., Ozdaglar, A., & Parrilo, P. A. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2010.2041686 · Cited by 2,086
Studies in Linear and Non-Linear Programming.
Beale, E. M. L., Arrow, K. J., Hurwicz, L., Uzawa, H., Chenery, H. B., Johnson, S. M., Karlin, S., Marschak, T., & Solow, R. M. (1959) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2342801 · Cited by 915
Distributed Continuous-Time Convex Optimization on Weight-Balanced Digraphs
Gharesifard, B., & Cortes, J. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2013.2278132 · Cited by 833
(2002) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/37.980245 · Cited by 796
(2013) · Encyclopedia of Systems Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_101044 · Cited by 736
Kia, S. S., Cortés, J., & Martínez, S. (2015) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2015.03.001 · Cited by 694
Adaptation, Learning, and Optimization over Networks
Sayed, A. H. (2014) · Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000051 · Cited by 667
Projected Dynamical Systems and Variational Inequalities with Applications
Nagurney, A., & Zhang, D. (1996) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2301-7 · Cited by 609
Cited by
A survey of distributed optimization
Yang, T., Yi, X., Wu, J., Yuan, Y., Wu, D., Meng, Z., Hong, Y., Wang, H., Lin, Z., & Johansson, K. H. (2019) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.05.006 · Cited by 913
Self-citationDistributed Nash equilibrium seeking for aggregative games with coupled constraints
Liang, S., Yi, P., & Hong, Y. (2017) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2017.07.064 · Cited by 328
Self-citationWang, X., & Chen, X. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2026.3684791
Metadata
- Authors
- Yi, P., Hong, Y., & Liu, F.
- Venue
- Automatica
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 74
- Pages
- 259-269
- ISSN
- 0005-1098 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2273484141
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 39.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.