Cited by 1Frequency Control in Power SystemsMicrogrid Control and OptimizationDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems

Distributed Coordination of Grid-Forming and Grid-Following Inverters for Optimal Frequency Control in Power Systems

Open access
Wang, Xiaoyang, Chen, Xin·2026·IEEE Transactions on Power Systems

Abstract

The large-scale integration of inverter-interfaced renewable energy sources presents significant challenges to maintaining power balance and nominal frequency in modern power systems. This paper studies grid-level coordinated control of grid-forming (GFM) and grid-following (GFL) inverter-based resources (IBRs) for scalable and optimal frequency control. We propose a fully distributed optimal frequency control algorithm based on the projected primal-dual gradient method and by lever aging the structure of the underlying physical system dynamics. The proposed algorithm i) restores the nominal system frequency while minimizing total control cost and enforcing time-varying IBR power capacity limits and line thermal constraints, and ii) operates in a distributed manner that only needs local measurements and neighbor-to-neighbor communication. In particular, when the line thermal constraints are disregarded, the proposed algorithm admits a fully local implementation that requires no communication, while still ensuring optimality and satisfying IBR power capacity limits. We establish the global asymptotic stability of the algorithm using Lyapunov stability analysis. The effectiveness and optimality of the proposed algorithms are validated through high-fidelity, 100% inverter-based electromagnetic transient (EMT) simulations on the IEEE 39-bus system. The simulations further demonstrate the effective coordination between synchronous generators and IBRs under the proposed control algorithms, as well as the robustness to measurement noise, communication delays, and parameter uncertainties.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpwrs.2026.3684791

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, X., & Chen, X.
Affiliations
Texas A&M University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
Published
2026-09
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
3831-3846
ISSN
  • 0885-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0679
OpenAlex
W7154631809
Cited by
0
References
45
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • NSF AMPS (2523934)
  • NSF CAREER (2541998)
  • Consortium on AI and Large Flexible Load at Texas A&M University (TPWRS-01308-2025)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Frequency Control in Power Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Keywords
grid-forming inverters, grid-following inverters, inverter-based resources, distributed coordination, Lyapunov stability, communication delay, measurement noise robustness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review