Cited by 188Stability and Control of Uncertain SystemsNeural Networks Stability and SynchronizationTeleoperation and Haptic Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A novel approach to H ∞ performance analysis of discrete-time networked systems subject to network-induced delays and malicious packet dropouts

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.automatica.2021.110010

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, X.-M., Han, Q.-L., & Ge, X.
Affiliations
Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Han, Qing-Long
Venue
Automatica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
136
Pages
110010
ISSN
0005-1098 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3212521951
Cited by
186
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 21
FWCI
13.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Automatica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Neural Networks Stability and Synchronization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
Keywords
H-infinity performance, network-induced delay, Lyapunov functional, quartic polynomials, inverted pendulum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review