Cited by 72Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectChild Abuse and Trauma

Asking men about domestic violence and abuse in a family medicine context: Help seeking and views on the general practitioner role

Morgan, K., Williamson, E., Hester, M., Jones, S., Feder, G.·2014·Aggression and Violent Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.avb.2014.09.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 72

Authors
Morgan, K., Williamson, E., Hester, M., Jones, S., & Feder, G.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Morgan, K.
Venue
Aggression and Violent Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
637-642
ISSN
1359-1789 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996077658
Cited by
72
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aggression and Violent Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (RP-PG-0108-10084)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
domestic violence, intimate partner violence, help-seeking, general practitioners, general practice, health professionals' role, informal support, health professions education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review