The multidimensional peer victimization scale: A systematic review
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The validity and reliability of the Multidimensional Peer Victimisation Scale is comparable across developmental periods, including emerging adulthood.
“Despite these differences, the validity and reliability of the Multidimensional Peer Victimisation Scale has been shown to be comparable across developmental periods, including emerging adulthood (Joseph & Stockton, 2018).”
From A cross‐lagged twin study of emotional symptoms, social isolation and peer victimisation from early adolescence to emerging adulthood (2023) · cites this paper as Joseph & Stockton, 2018
Cites
Hawker, D. S. J., & Boulton, M. J. (2000) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00629 · Cited by 2,694 · see citing works
The role of google scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching
Haddaway, N. R., Collins, A. M., Coughlin, D., & Kirk, S. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138237 · Cited by 2,387 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Morneau‐Vaillancourt, G., Oginni, O., Assary, E., Krebs, G., Thompson, E. J., Palaiologou, E., Lockhart, C., Arseneault, L., & Eley, T. C. (2023) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13847 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“Despite these differences, the validity and reliability of the Multi-dimensional Peer Victimisation Scale has been shown to be comparable across developmental periods, including emerging adulthood (Joseph & Stockton, 2018).”
Background
- Authors
- Joseph, S., & Stockton, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Joseph, Stephen
- Venue
- Aggression and Violent Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 42
- Pages
- 96-114
- ISSN
- 1359-1789 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2885017305
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 0.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Aggression and Violent Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- peer victimization, psychometric properties, measurement reliability, measurement validity, bullying, sex differences, direct victimization, indirect victimization, bullying intervention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
