Vascular access thrombosis in France: incidence and treatment patterns
Abstract
Background Vascular access thrombosis lacks the implementation of a treatment algorithm at large scale, involving all the actors. We aimed to determine a better understanding of the current practice patterns around vascular access thrombosis in France, with 4 axes: incidence, surveillance protocol, treatment, and time to treatment. Methods A comprehensive survey of all the nephrologists staffing all hemodialysis centers in France during April 2013 included 266 of 269 (99%) centers, treating 27,798 patients with arteriovenous fistula or graft. Results In 104 centers treating 11,088 patients, there were 905 documented episodes of vascular access thrombosis (8.8%) in 1 year; in the other 162 centers that supplied a range of events, the mean incidence was 8.4%. Use of in-line access flow monitoring as part of surveillance program was not correlated with better outcome compared with Doppler ultrasound (thrombosis: 7.9% vs. 10%, respectively, P = 0.09). Fifty-three percent of centers referred the patients to a vascular surgeon and 32% to an interventional radiologist (2% to urologist and 13% variable referral depending on the case complexity). Time to treatment was <24 hr in 58% and <48 hr in 91% of the centers; treatment >48 hr (9%) occurred mainly in rural zones (P = 0.04). The specialty of the treating physician did not influence time to treatment (P > 0.05). Conclusions In France, vascular access thrombosis rate is low and not influenced by surveillance protocol type. Most patients can receive timely treatment by vascular surgeons or interventional radiologists.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All these rates are far lower than the 50%−96% implementation rate reported in a series of international studies.
“All these rates are far lower than the 50%−96% implementation rate reported in a series of international studies (41–43).”
From Construction of nursing-sensitive quality indicators for hemodialysis vascular access: a Delphi study (2026) · cites this paper as [43]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhang, Y., He, L., Tang, S., Gao, Y., Chen, H., Shi, M., & Chen, L. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1858484
“All these rates are far lower than the 50% − 96% implementation rate reported in a series of international studies (41–43).”
- Authors
- Sadaghianloo, N., Jean-Baptiste, E., Islam, M. S., Dardik, A., Declemy, S., & Hassen-Khodja, R.
- Affiliations
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice (FR)
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- Annals of Vascular Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1203-1210
- ISSN
- 0890-5096 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1603890215
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Vascular Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal and Vascular Pathologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vascular Procedures and Complications
- Keywords
- vascular access thrombosis, hemodialysis, arteriovenous fistula, arteriovenous graft, thrombosis incidence, Doppler ultrasound, time to treatment, interventional radiology, nephrologists, France
- MeSH terms
- Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical, Attitude of Health Personnel, France, Graft Occlusion, Vascular, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Surveys and Questionnaires, Referral and Consultation, Thrombosis, Time Factors, Incidence, Treatment Outcome, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Health Care Surveys, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, Time-to-Treatment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review