Cited by 10Central Venous Catheters and HemodialysisRenal and Vascular PathologiesVascular Procedures and Complications

Vascular access thrombosis in France: incidence and treatment patterns

Sadaghianloo, Nirvana, Jean-Baptiste, Elixène, Islam, Mohammed S., Dardik, Alan, Declemy, Serge, Hassen-Khodja, Réda·2015·Annals of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

Background Vascular access thrombosis lacks the implementation of a treatment algorithm at large scale, involving all the actors. We aimed to determine a better understanding of the current practice patterns around vascular access thrombosis in France, with 4 axes: incidence, surveillance protocol, treatment, and time to treatment. Methods A comprehensive survey of all the nephrologists staffing all hemodialysis centers in France during April 2013 included 266 of 269 (99%) centers, treating 27,798 patients with arteriovenous fistula or graft. Results In 104 centers treating 11,088 patients, there were 905 documented episodes of vascular access thrombosis (8.8%) in 1 year; in the other 162 centers that supplied a range of events, the mean incidence was 8.4%. Use of in-line access flow monitoring as part of surveillance program was not correlated with better outcome compared with Doppler ultrasound (thrombosis: 7.9% vs. 10%, respectively, P = 0.09). Fifty-three percent of centers referred the patients to a vascular surgeon and 32% to an interventional radiologist (2% to urologist and 13% variable referral depending on the case complexity). Time to treatment was <24 hr in 58% and <48 hr in 91% of the centers; treatment >48 hr (9%) occurred mainly in rural zones (P = 0.04). The specialty of the treating physician did not influence time to treatment (P > 0.05). Conclusions In France, vascular access thrombosis rate is low and not influenced by surveillance protocol type. Most patients can receive timely treatment by vascular surgeons or interventional radiologists.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.02.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sadaghianloo, N., Jean-Baptiste, E., Islam, M. S., Dardik, A., Declemy, S., & Hassen-Khodja, R.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice (FR)
  • Yale University (US)
Venue
Annals of Vascular Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
1203-1210
ISSN
0890-5096 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1603890215
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Vascular Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal and Vascular Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vascular Procedures and Complications
Keywords
vascular access thrombosis, hemodialysis, arteriovenous fistula, arteriovenous graft, thrombosis incidence, Doppler ultrasound, time to treatment, interventional radiology, nephrologists, France
MeSH terms
Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical, Attitude of Health Personnel, France, Graft Occlusion, Vascular, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Surveys and Questionnaires, Referral and Consultation, Thrombosis, Time Factors, Incidence, Treatment Outcome, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Health Care Surveys, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, Time-to-Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review