Cited by 137Face Recognition and PerceptionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Sex, sexual orientation, and identification of positive and negative facial affect

Rahman, Qazi, Wilson, Glenn D., Abrahams, Sharon·2004·Brain and Cognition

Abstract

Sex and sexual orientation related differences in processing of happy and sad facial emotions were examined using an experimental facial emotion recognition paradigm with a large sample (N = 240). Analysis of covariance (controlling for age and IQ) revealed that women (irrespective of sexual orientation) had faster reaction times than men for accurate identification of facial emotion and were more accurate in identifying male faces than female ones, whereas men performed the same regardless of the sex of the face. However, there were no overall sex differences in accuracy. These findings suggest a limited role for sex in the perception of facial affect.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.01.002

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of sex differences in social cognition have mainly focused on emotional expression perception and mental state reasoning with little emphasis placed on imitation.

    “Furthermore, studies of sex differences in social cognition have mainly focused on emotional expression perception and mental state reasoning with little emphasis placed on imitation (Krach et al., 2009;Russell, Tchanturia, Rahman, & Schmidt, 2007;Rahman, Wilson, & Abrahams, 2004;Campbell et al., 2002;Thayer & Johnsen, 2000).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rahman, Q., Wilson, G. D., & Abrahams, S.
Affiliations
  • University of East London (GB)
  • University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Rahman, Qazi
Venue
Brain and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-04
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
179-185
ISSN
0278-2626 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082394089
Cited by
137
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
facial emotion recognition, sex differences, sexual orientation, happy and sad faces, face perception
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Discrimination Learning, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Sexual Behavior, Sex Factors, Homosexuality, Male, Homosexuality, Female

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review