Cognitive control of saccadic eye movements.
Open accessAbstract
The saccadic eye movement system provides researchers with a powerful tool with which to explore the cognitive control of behaviour. It is a behavioural system whose limited output can be measured with exceptional precision, and whose input can be controlled and manipulated in subtle ways. A range of cognitive processes (notably those involved in working memory and attention) have been shown to influence saccade parameters. Researchers interested in the relationship between cognitive function and psychiatric disorders have made extensive use of saccadic eye movement tasks to draw inferences as to the cognitive deficits associated with particular psychopathologies. The purpose of this review is to provide researchers with an overview of the research literature documenting cognitive involvement in saccadic tasks in healthy controls. An appreciation of this literature provides a solid background against which to interpret the deficits on saccadic tasks demonstrated in patient populations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Unconscious gaze control is highly effective and has multiple capabilities.
“The problem is how to evolve a conscious mechanism of gaze control when a highly effective unconscious one with multiple capabilities (e.g., see Schiller and Tehovnik, 2005; Hutton, 2008) is already in place.”
From The function(s) of consciousness revisited: insights from a modular/constitutive model using vision as a test case (2026) · cites this paper as Hutton, 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 144 · Cited by 409
- Authors
- Hutton, S. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hutton, S.B.
- Venue
- Brain and Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 327-340
- ISSN
- 0278-2626 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029864217
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 144
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 7.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Brain and Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Keywords
- saccades, cognitive control, working memory, attention, healthy controls
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Cognition, Eye Movements, Humans, Memory, Motion Perception, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Saccades, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review