CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 142Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchReading and Literacy Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Semantic feature knowledge and picture naming in dementia of Alzheimer's type: a new approach

Open access
GARRARD, P, LAMBONRALPH, M, PATTERSON, K, PRATT, K, HODGES, J·2005·Brain and Language
DOI 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.08.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This study addresses continuing controversies concerning the nature of semantic impairment in early dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT), and the relationship between conceptual knowledge and picture naming. A series of analyses of fine-grained feature knowledge data show that: (1) distinctive features of concepts were more vulnerable than shared; (2) the amount of attribute knowledge about a concept was associated reliably, and in a graded fashion, with the ability to name a picture of that item; (3) sensory features were differentially important in naming; and (4) the degree of disruption to different types of attribute knowledge did not vary between items from living and nonliving domains. These findings are discussed in the context of contemporary cognitive and computational models of semantic memory organisation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.08.003

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nebes, R. D. (1989). Semantic memory in AlzheimerÕs disease. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 377-394.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 142

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
GARRARD, P., LAMBONRALPH, M., PATTERSON, K., PRATT, K., & HODGES, J.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
Corresponding author
GARRARD, P
ORCID
Venue
Brain and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-04
Volume
93
Issue
1
Pages
79-94
ISSN
0093-934X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.bandl.2004.08.003
OpenAlex
W1971182479
Cited by
142
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Brain and Language (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, semantic memory, picture naming, semantic impairment, distinctive features, shared features, sensory features, conceptual knowledge
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Semantics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review