Cited by 64Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismLanguage Development and DisordersReading and Literacy Development

Neural network processing of natural language: II. Towards a unified model of corticostriatal function in learning sentence comprehension and non-linguistic sequencing

Dominey, Peter Ford, Inui, Toshio, Hoen, Michel·2009·Brain and Language

Abstract

A central issue in cognitive neuroscience today concerns how distributed neural networks in the brain that are used in language learning and processing can be involved in non-linguistic cognitive sequence learning. This issue is informed by a wealth of functional neurophysiology studies of sentence comprehension, along with a number of recent studies that examined the brain processes involved in learning non-linguistic sequences, or artificial grammar learning (AGL). The current research attempts to reconcile these data with several current neurophysiologically based models of sentence processing, through the specification of a neural network model whose architecture is constrained by the known cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) neuroanatomy of the human language system. The challenge is to develop simulation models that take into account constraints both from neuranatomical connectivity, and from functional imaging data, and that can actually learn and perform the same kind of language and artificial syntax tasks. In our proposed model, structural cues encoded in a recurrent cortical network in BA47 activate a CSTC circuit to modulate the flow of lexical semantic information from BA45 to an integrated representation of meaning at the sentence level in BA44/6. During language acquisition, corticostriatal plasticity is employed to allow closed class structure to drive thematic role assignment. From the AGL perspective, repetitive internal structure in the AGL strings is e…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.08.002

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous work has successfully assessed dementia based on automatic analysis of speech and text and has correlated the level of cognitive decline with speech impairment.

    “Previous work has successfully assessed dementia based on automatic analysis of speech and text and has correlated the level of cognitive decline with speech impairment [45].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dominey, P. F., Inui, T., & Hoen, M.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
Dominey, Peter Ford
Venue
Brain and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
109
Issue
2-3
Pages
80-92
ISSN
0093-934X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140345716
Cited by
64
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain and Language (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
corticostriatal circuits, sentence comprehension, artificial grammar learning, sequence learning, neural network model, language acquisition, thematic role assignment, closed-class words, corticostriatal plasticity, syntactic comprehension, transfer test
MeSH terms
Brain, Language, Learning, Linguistics, Neural Pathways, Speech Perception, Neural Networks, Computer, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review