The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In vitro measurements and interpretation of total antioxidant capacity
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND One of the strategies most commonly used to assess a free radical-antioxidant balance in chemical and biological systems is the determination of the total antioxidant capacity (TAC). A large amount of research has been published using TAC. However, it remains unclear which is the significance of these investigations for understanding the biological importance of free radical reactions. SCOPE OF REVIEW This review discusses the relevance and limitations of TAC for the assessment of the antioxidant activities present in food and food derivatives, and in body tissues and fluids. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS TAC determinations are simple, inexpensive, and able to evaluate the capacity of known and unknown antioxidants and their additive, synergistic and/or antagonistic actions, in chemical and biological systems. However, different TAC assays correlate poorly with each other, since each TAC assay is sensitive to a particular combination of compounds, but exclude many others. The TAC values for foods cannot be translated to the in vivo (human) antioxidant defenses, and furthermore, to health effects provided by that food. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE Up to date, conclusions that can be drawn from the extensive amount of research done using TAC of foods or populations should not be considered when used for making decisions affecting population health. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Current methods to study reactive oxygen species - pros and cons and biophysics of membrane proteins. Guest Editor: Christine Winterbourn.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Chemistry behind Antioxidant Capacity Assays
Huang, D., Ou, B., & Prior, R. L. (2005) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf030723c · Cited by 6,162
Cited by
Measurement and Clinical Significance of Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress in Humans
Marrocco, I., Altieri, F., & Peluso, I. (2017) · Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity · doi:10.1155/2017/6501046 · Cited by 855
Betanin—A food colorant with biological activity
Esatbeyoglu, T., Wagner, A. E., Schini‐Kerth, V. B., & Rimbach, G. (2015) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.201400484 · Cited by 406
Oxidative Stress and Human Hypertension: Vascular Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Novel Therapies
Montezano, A. C., Dulak-Lis, M., Tsiropoulou, S., Harvey, A., Briones, A. M., & Touyz, R. M. (2015) · Canadian Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2015.02.008 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Fraga, C. G., Oteiza, P. I., & Galleano, M.
- Venue
- Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 1840
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 931-934
- ISSN
- 0304-4165 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977749374
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vitro measurements and interpretation of total antioxidant capacity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.06.030
- The paper
- Fraga, C. G., Oteiza, P. I., & Galleano, M. (2014). In vitro measurements and interpretation of total antioxidant capacity. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.06.030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.