The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structure, membrane orientation, mechanism, and function of pexiganan — A highly potent antimicrobial peptide designed from magainin
Open accessAbstract
The growing problem of bacterial resistance to conventional antibiotic compounds and the need for new antibiotics has stimulated interest in the development of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as human therapeutics. Development of topically applied agents, such as pexiganan (also known as MSI-78, an analog of the naturally occurring magainin2, extracted from the skin of the African frog Xenopus laevis) has been the focus of pharmaceutical development largely because of the relative safety of topical therapy and the uncertainty surrounding the long-term toxicology of any new class of drug administered systemically. The main hurdle that has hindered the development of antimicrobial peptides is that many of the naturally occurring peptides (such as magainin), although active in vitro, are effective in animal models of infection only at very high doses, often close to the toxic doses of the peptide, reflecting an unacceptable margin of safety. Though MSI-78 did not pass the FDA approval, it is still the best-studied AMP to date for therapeutic purposes. Biophysical studies have shown that this peptide is unstructured in solution, forms an antiparallel dimer of amphipathic helices upon binding to the membrane, and disrupts membrane via toroidal-type pore formation. This article covers functional, biophysical, biochemical and structural studies on pexiganan.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms
Zasloff, M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415389a · Cited by 8,457
Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria?
Brogden, K. A. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1098 · Cited by 5,829
Infection with Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Containing the vanA Resistance Gene
Chang, S., Sievert, D. M., Hageman, J. C., Boulton, M. L., Tenover, F. C., Downes, F. P., Shah, S., Rudrik, J. T., Pupp, G. R., Brown, W. J., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa025025 · Cited by 1,095
Cited by
Roy, R., Tiwari, M., Donelli, G., & Tiwari, V. (2018) · Virulence · doi:10.1080/21505594.2017.1313372 · Cited by 1,523
Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections
(2021) · Indian Journal of Continuing Nursing Education · doi:10.4103/2230-7354.320831 · Cited by 855
Ageitos, J. M., Sánchez-Pérez, A., Calo-Mata, P., & Villa, T. G. (2017) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2016.09.018 · Cited by 614
Gan, B. H., Gaynord, J., Rowe, S. M., Deingruber, T., & Spring, D. R. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00729c · Cited by 511
Review: Lessons Learned From Clinical Trials Using Antimicrobial Peptides (AMPs)
Dijksteel, G. S., Ulrich, M. M. W., Middelkoop, E., & Boekema, B. K. H. L. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.616979 · Cited by 428
Metadata
- Authors
- Gottler, L. M., & Ramamoorthy, A.
- Venue
- Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 1788
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1680-1686
- ISSN
- 0005-2736 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123172081
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure, membrane orientation, mechanism, and function of pexiganan — A highly potent antimicrobial peptide designed from magainin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.10.009
- The paper
- Gottler, L. M., & Ramamoorthy, A. (2009). Structure, membrane orientation, mechanism, and function of pexiganan — A highly potent antimicrobial peptide designed from magainin. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.10.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.