Cited by 10Drug Transport and Resistance MechanismsCell death mechanisms and regulationCellular transport and secretion

RLIP: An existential requirement for breast carcinogenesis

Open access
Singhal, Sharad S., Salgia, Ravi, Singhal, Sulabh, Horne, David, Awasthi, Sanjay·2019·Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Due to its complexity in nature, effective BC treatment can encounter many challenges. The human RALBP1 gene encodes a 76-kDa splice variant protein, RLIP (ral-binding protein1, RalBP1), a stress-protective mercapturic acid pathway (MAP) transporter protein, that also plays a key role in regulating clathrin-dependent endocytosis (CDE) as a Ral effector. Growing evidence shows that targeting RLIP may be an effective strategy in cancer therapy, as RLIP is over-expressed in multiple cancers and is known to induce resistance to apoptosis and chemotherapeutic drugs. Recent studies demonstrated that RLIP is expressed in human BC tissues, as well as BC cell lines. Knockdown of RLIP resulted in apoptotic death of BC cells in vitro, and targeted inhibition and depletion of RLIP resulted in regression of BC in xenograft studies of nude mice. Signaling studies showed that RLIP depletion inhibited endocytosis and differentially regulated signaling to Akt, Myc, and ERK1/2. However, the proliferation and multi-specific transport mechanisms that promote RLIP-mediated cell death in BC are not well understood. In this review, we will discuss a missing but an essentially determining and connecting piece of the puzzle on the understanding of proliferation and transport mechanisms by focused analyses of the apoptotic, drug- and radiation-sensitivity regulated by RLIP, a stress-responsive non-ATP-binding cassette (ABC), high capa…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbcan.2019.02.001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singhal, S. S., Salgia, R., Singhal, S., Horne, D., & Awasthi, S.
Affiliations
  • City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
  • Texas Tech University (US)
Corresponding author
Singhal, Sharad S.
Venue
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
1871
Issue
2
Pages
281-288
ISSN
0304-419X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2914422685
Cited by
10
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-16-1-0641)
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (P30CA33572)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
RALBP1, breast cancer, carcinogenesis, mercapturic acid pathway, clathrin-mediated endocytosis, apoptosis, chemoresistance, radiosensitivity, Akt signaling, c-Myc, ERK1/2, xenograft tumor regression, cancer therapy targets
MeSH terms
Animals, Breast Neoplasms, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Female, Humans, Radiation Tolerance, ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Protein Isoforms, GTPase-Activating Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review