Cited by 93

Impaired striatal GABA transmission in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

Rossi, Silvia, Muzio, Luca, De Chiara, Valentina, Grasselli, Giorgio, Musella, Alessandra, Musumeci, Gabriele, Mandolesi, Georgia, De Ceglia, Roberta +8 more·2011·Brain, Behavior, and Immunity

Abstract

Synaptic dysfunction triggers neuronal damage in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a model of multiple sclerosis (MS). While excessive glutamate signaling has been reported in the striatum of EAE, it is still uncertain whether GABA synapses are altered. Electrophysiological recordings showed a reduction of spontaneous GABAergic synaptic currents (sIPSCs) recorded from striatal projection neurons of mice with MOG((35-55))-induced EAE. GABAergic sIPSC deficits started in the acute phase of the disease (20-25days post immunization, dpi), and were exacerbated at later time-points (35, 50, 70 and 90dpi). Of note, in slices they were independent of microglial activation and of release of TNF-α. Indeed, sIPSC inhibition likely involved synaptic inputs arising from GABAergic interneurons, because EAE preferentially reduced sIPSCs of high amplitude, and was associated with a selective loss of striatal parvalbumin (PV)-positive GABAergic interneurons, which contact striatal projection neurons in their somatic region, giving rise to more efficient synaptic inhibition. Furthermore, we found also that the chronic persistence of pro-inflammatory cytokines were able, per se, to produce profound alterations of electrophysiological network properties, that were reverted by GABA administration. The results of the present investigation indicate defective GABA transmission in MS models depending from alteration of PV cells number and, in part, deriving from the effects of a chroni…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.10.004

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rossi, S., Muzio, L., De Chiara, V., Grasselli, G., Musella, A., Musumeci, G., Mandolesi, G., De Ceglia, R., Maida, S., Biffi, E., Pedrocchi, A., Menegon, A., Bernardi, G., Furlan, R., Martino, G., & Centonze, D.
Venue
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
947-956
ISSN
0889-1591
Cited by
93
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review