Cited by 42Exercise and Physiological ResponsesCardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and Training

Training status and sex influence on senescent T-lymphocyte redistribution in response to acute maximal exercise

Brown, Frankie F., Bigley, Austin B., Sherry, Chris, Neal, Craig M., Witard, Oliver C., Simpson, Richard J., Galloway, Stuart D.R.·2014·Brain, Behavior, and Immunity

Abstract

Purpose Investigate training status and sex effects on the redistribution of senescent and naïve T-lymphocytes following acute exercise.Methods Sixteen (8 male, 8 female) trained (18.3±1.7yr) soccer players (Tr) and sixteen (8 male, 8 female) untrained (19.3±2.0yr) controls (UTr) performed a treadmill running test to volitional exhaustion. Blood lymphocytes were isolated before (Pre), immediately post, and 1-h post-exercise for assessment of cell surface expression of CD28 and CD57 on CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-lymphocyte subsets. Plasma was used to determine cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus.Results Exercise elicited a redistribution of T-lymphocyte subsets. Senescent CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-lymphocytes increased by 42.4% and 45.9% respectively, while naïve CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-lymphocytes decreased by 8.7% and 22.5% respectively in response to exercise. A main effect (P<0.05) of training status was observed for senescent CD4(+), CD8(+) and naïve CD8(+) T-lymphocytes: UTr had a higher proportion of senescent and a lower proportion of naïve CD8(+) T-lymphocytes than Tr. A main effect (P<0.05) of sex was observed in senescent CD4(+), CD8(+) and naïve CD4(+), CD8(+) T-lymphocytes. Males had a higher proportion of senescent and lower proportion of naïve T-lymphocytes than females. A sex-by-training status interaction (P<0.05) was observed for the senescent and naïve CD4(+) T-lymphocytes (but not CD8(+)) with the highest percentage of senescent and lowest percentage of naïve T-lymphocytes observed in UTr males. CMV exerted a significant main covariate effect (P<0.05) in the senescent and naïve (P<0.05) CD8(+) T-lymphocytes but not in the senescent and naïve CD4(+) T-lymphocytes.Conclusion This study highlights important sex and training status differences in the senescent and naïve T-lymphocyte redistribution in response to exercise that warrants further investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbi.2013.10.031

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In active individuals or those exposed to moderate-to-high volumes of exercise over a short period, exercise likely exerts an anti-immunosenescence effect in a dose-dependent manner until a certain threshold.

    “When examining individuals described as being active or those who have been exposed to moderate-to-high volumes of exercise over a short period of the lifespan (e.g., young adults), it is likely that exercise exerts an anti-immunosenescence effect in a dose-dependent manner until a certain threshold (Brown et al. 2014; Spielmann et al. 2011).”

    From Is immunosenescence influenced by our lifetime “dose” of exercise? (2016) · cites this paper as Brown et al. 2014

  • Untrained individuals exhibited the highest proportions of CD4+ and CD8+ late-stage differentiated cells and the lowest proportions of CD8+ naive cells.

    “Supporting an anti-immunosenescence effect of exercise, untrained individuals exhibited the highest proportions of CD4+ and CD8+ late-stage differentiated cells, and the lowest proportions of CD8+ naïve cells (Brown et al. 2014).”

    From Is immunosenescence influenced by our lifetime “dose” of exercise? (2016) · cites this paper as Brown et al. 2014

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 42

Authors
Brown, F. F., Bigley, A. B., Sherry, C., Neal, C. M., Witard, O. C., Simpson, R. J., & Galloway, S. D. R.
Affiliations
University of Stirling (GB)
Corresponding author
Galloway, Stuart D.R.
Venue
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
39
Pages
152-159
ISSN
0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038300863
Cited by
42
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
naive T cells, acute exercise, exercise immunology, training status, sex differences, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, CD57, CD28, CMV serostatus, soccer players, lymphocyte redistribution, immunosenescence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Male, Sex Factors, Exercise, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, T-Lymphocyte Subsets, Cellular Senescence, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Young Adult, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review