Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Donor Cell Leukemia: A Review

Open access
Wiseman, Daniel H.·2011·Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Abstract

Relapse of acute leukemia following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) usually represents return of an original disease clone, having evaded eradication by pretransplant chemo-/radiotherapy, conditioning, or posttransplant graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. Rarely, acute leukemia can develop de novo in engrafted cells of donor origin. Donor cell leukemia (DCL) was first recognized in 1971, but for many years, the paucity of reported cases suggested it to be a rare phenomenon. However, in recent years, an upsurge in reported cases (in parallel with advances in molecular chimerism monitoring) suggest that it may be significantly more common than previously appreciated; emerging evidence suggests that DCL might represent up to 5% of all posttransplant leukemia "relapses." Recognition of DCL is important for several reasons. Donor-derivation of the leukemic clone has implications when selecting appropriate therapy, because seeking to enhance an allogeneic GVL effect would intuitively not have the same role as in standard recipient-derived relapses. There are also broader implications for donor selection and workup, particularly given the growing popularity of nonmyeloblative HSCT and corresponding rising age of the potential donor pool. Identification of DCL raises potential concerns over future health of the donor, posing ethical dilemmas regarding responsibilities toward donor notification (particularly in the context of cord blood transplantation). The entity of DCL is also of research interest, because it might provide a unique human model for studying the mechanisms of leukemogenesis in vivo. This review presents and collates all reported cases of DCL, and discusses the various strategies, controversies, and pitfalls when investigating origin of posttransplant relapse. Putative etiologic factors and mechanisms are proposed, and attempts made to address the difficult ethical questions posed by discovery of donor-derived malignancy within a HSCT recipient.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.10.010

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 183

Metadata

Authors
Wiseman, D. H.
Venue
Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
771-789
ISSN
1083-8791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009474598
Cited by
183
References
2
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Donor Cell Leukemia: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.10.010
The paper
Wiseman, D. H. (2011). Donor Cell Leukemia: A Review. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.10.010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.