Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 984

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 253 of the 253 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Haematopoietic stem cell activity and interactions with the niche

Open access
Pinho, Sandra, Frenette, Paul S.·2019·Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Abstract

The haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) microenvironment in the bone marrow, termed the niche, ensures haematopoietic homeostasis by controlling the proliferation, self-renewal, differentiation and migration of HSCs and progenitor cells at steady state and in response to emergencies and injury. Improved methods for HSC isolation, driven by advances in single-cell and molecular technologies, have led to a better understanding of their behaviour, heterogeneity and lineage fate and of the niche cells and signals that regulate their function. Niche regulatory signals can be in the form of cell-bound or secreted factors and other local physical cues. A combination of technological advances in bone marrow imaging and genetic manipulation of crucial regulatory factors has enabled the identification of several candidate cell types regulating the niche, including both non-haematopoietic (for example, perivascular mesenchymal stem and endothelial cells) and HSC-derived (for example, megakaryocytes, macrophages and regulatory T cells), with better topographical understanding of HSC localization in the bone marrow. Here, we review advances in our understanding of HSC regulation by niches during homeostasis, ageing and cancer, and we discuss their implications for the development of therapies to rejuvenate aged HSCs or niches or to disrupt self-reinforcing malignant niches. The haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) niche in the bone marrow ensures haematopoiesis by regulating the function of HSCs and progenitor cells. An improved understanding of this regulation in homeostasis, ageing and cancer should aid the development of therapies to rejuvenate aged HSCs or niches and treat malignancies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41580-019-0103-9

Cites

253 of 253 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 253 references

Cited by

See all 984

Metadata

Authors
Pinho, S., & Frenette, P. S.
Venue
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
Published
2019-02-11
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
303-320
ISSN
  • 1471-0072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0080
OpenAlex
W2914523197
Cited by
984
References
253
FWCI
30.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Haematopoietic stem cell activity and interactions with the niche. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41580-019-0103-9
The paper
Pinho, S., & Frenette, P. S. (2019). Haematopoietic stem cell activity and interactions with the niche. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-019-0103-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.