Cited by 44Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Abilities and Testing

Spontaneously hypertensive, Wistar-Kyoto and Sprague-Dawley rats differ in performance on a win-shift task in the water radial arm maze.

CLEMENTS, K, WAINWRIGHT, P·2006·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

The spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) is a commonly used animal model of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Previous literature is inconclusive with respect to the exact nature of memory impairments in this strain. The objective of this study was to assess spatial memory as measured by performance of male SHR, Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) and Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats on a win-shift version of the water radial arm maze. On this task, all strains made more errors on Trial 4 when the mnemonic demand was highest, and showed a similar response when the delay was increased from 60s to 2h on Week 3. Both SHR and WKY rats made more reference memory errors than SD, however, SHR showed minimal improvement over weeks. The increase in errors may be due to a greater inclination of SHR and WKY to use a chaining strategy of entering consecutive arms than SD. Furthermore, the number of incomplete arm entries into reference memory arms decreased over weeks in WKY and SD, but increased in SHR, suggesting increased impulsivity of SHR at the later stages of testing. Although based on number of errors, the data indicate that SHR may have memory deficits, the data relating to arm entries suggest that the minimal improvement in SHR over weeks may have been due to greater impulsivity in the later weeks, rather than defective memory. Thus, these findings are consistent with SHR having impairments with selection of appropriate behavioural responses in a goal-directed task.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.09.016

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maze performance of SHR rats suggests they preferentially use response strategies to guide behavior in spatial tasks.

    “Maze performance of SHR rats suggests they preferentially use response strategies to guide behavior in spatial tasks (Clements and Wainwright, 2006; Clements et al., 2007; Kantak et al., 2008).”

    From The Effects of Methylphenidate on Goal-directed Behavior in a Rat Model of ADHD (2015) · cites this paper as Clements and Wainwright, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CLEMENTS, K., & WAINWRIGHT, P.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
CLEMENTS, K
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-02-28
Volume
167
Issue
2
Pages
295-304
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083543693
Cited by
44
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
spontaneously hypertensive rats, Wistar-Kyoto rats, Sprague-Dawley rats, spatial memory, reference memory, memory impairment, impulsivity, goal-directed behavior
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Disease Models, Animal, Escape Reaction, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Memory, Rats, Inbred SHR, Rats, Inbred WKY, Space Perception, Spatial Behavior, Species Specificity, Single-Blind Method, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Statistics, Nonparametric, Maze Learning, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review