Hunger is the best spice: An fMRI study of the effects of attention, hunger and calorie content on food reward processing in the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex
Open accessAbstract
Research indicates that dysfunctional food reward processing may contribute to pathological eating behaviour. It is widely recognized that both the amygdala and the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) are essential parts of the brain's reward circuitry. The aims of this fMRI study were (1) to examine the effects of food deprivation and calorie content on reward processing in the amygdala and the OFC, and (2) to examine whether an explicit evaluation of foods is necessary for OFC, but not amygdalar activity. Addressing the first aim, healthy females were presented with high and low calorie food pictures while being either hungry or satiated. For the second aim, attention focus was manipulated by directing participants' attention either to the food or to a neutral aspect. This study shows that hunger interacts with the energy content of foods, modulating activity in the posterior cingulate cortex, medial OFC, insula, caudate putamen and fusiform gyrus. Results show that satiated healthy females show an increased reward processing in response to low calorie foods. Confirming our hypothesis, food deprivation increased activity following the presentation of high calorie foods, which may explain why treatments of obesity energy restricting diets often are unsuccessful. Interestingly, activity in both the amygdala and mOFC was only evident when participants explicitly evaluated foods. However, attention independent activity was found in the mPFC following the high calorie foods cues when participants where hungry. Current findings indicate that research on how attention modulates food reward processing might prove especially insightful in the study of the neural substrates of healthy and pathological eating behaviour.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reflecting on one's internal state or on whether trait words apply to oneself increases activation in dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, area 24 of MFa.
“reflecting on one’s internal state (101, 102) or on whether particular trait words apply to oneself (103) increases activation in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (area 24 of the MFa).”
From Localization of Dysfunction in Major Depressive Disorder: Prefrontal Cortex and Amygdala (2011) · cites this paper as [101]
The null effects in these fMRI experiments may be due to small samples (Ns = 10 to 20).
“potentially because of the small samples used in these studies (Ns = 10 to 20).”
From Caloric deprivation increases responsivity of attention and reward brain regions to intake, anticipated intake, and images of palatable foods (2013) · cites this paper as Siep et al., 2009
Null effects also emerged in fMRI experiments on caloric deprivation and food image response.
“though null effects also emerged (Siep et al., 2009; Uher et al., 2006)”
From Caloric deprivation increases responsivity of attention and reward brain regions to intake, anticipated intake, and images of palatable foods (2013) · cites this paper as Siep et al., 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 87 · Cited by 375
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Robinson TE, Berridge KC. Addiction. Annu Rev Psychol 2003;54:25-53.
- Cabanac M:. Q Rev Biol 1979;54:1-29.
- Authors
- Siep, N., Roefs, A., Roebroeck, A., Havermans, R., Bonte, M. L., & Jansen, A.
- Affiliations
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Siep, Nicolette
- Venue
- Behavioural Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 198
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 149-158
- ISSN
- 0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125749907
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 8.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Keywords
- hunger, food deprivation, calorie content, amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex, attention, food evaluation, posterior cingulate cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, insula, caudate-putamen, fusiform gyrus, obesity, hypocaloric diet, eating behaviour
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Amygdala, Attention, Energy Intake, Cues, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food, Food Deprivation, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Hunger, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Putamen, Reward, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review