Cited by 20Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesSpatial Cognition and Navigation

Hippocampal lesions in homing pigeons do not impair feature-quality or feature-quantity discrimination

Coppola, Vincent J., Spencer, Joy M., Peterson, Ryan M., Bingman, Verner P.·2014·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

The role of the avian hippocampal formation (HF) in spatial cognition is well demonstrated. However, it remains uncertain if the avian hippocampus, like its mammalian counterpart, has a role in the integration of elements that could compose a memory independent of space. The two experiments in the current study examined whether the HF of homing pigeons (Columba livia) was required to encode into memory a discriminative representation of food quality (Experiment 1) and quantity (Experiment 2) with different food bowl-features. Pigeons were exposed to an array of different colored bowls, two of which contained food rewards differing in preferred quality or quantity. To render space irrelevant for memory encoding, the location of the food-rewarded bowls was altered between each trial, while the features of the rewarded bowls remained constant. Both groups learned the feature-based quality and quantity discrimination tasks and no difference in performance between control pigeons and those with bilateral lesions of the hippocampus were found. The findings do not support the hypothesis that the avian HF is recruited when only non-spatial elements are integrated into a unified memory. From the current study, and the literature as a whole, it appears that the avian HF, unlike the mammalian hippocampus, may play no necessary role in memory processes where space is irrelevant.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.11.038

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hippocampal lesions in mammals, birds, and reptiles produce impairments on spatial tasks that require the use of map-like or relational spatial memory.

    “For example, in mammals [39,57,72,149], birds [97,98,99,150,151,152,153], and reptiles [112,154,155,156,157], the hippocampal lesions produce impairments on spatial tasks that require the use of map-like or relational spatial memory.”

    From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [151]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coppola, V. J., Spencer, J. M., Peterson, R. M., & Bingman, V. P.
Affiliations
Bowling Green State University (US)
Corresponding author
Coppola, Vincent J.
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
260
Pages
83-91
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980742035
Cited by
20
References
5
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Keywords
homing pigeons, hippocampal lesions, spatial cognition, memory encoding, non-spatial memory, memory integration, Columba livia
MeSH terms
Animals, Choice Behavior, Discrimination Learning, Food, Hippocampus, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Columbidae, Random Allocation, Reward, Task Performance and Analysis, Mathematical Concepts, Taste Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review