I endeavor to make it: Effort increases valuation of subsequent monetary reward
Abstract
Although it is commonly accepted that the amount of effort we put into accomplishing a task would exert an influence on subsequent reward processing and outcome evaluation, whether effort is incorporated as a cost or it would increase the valuation of concomitant reward is still under debate. In this study, EEGs were recorded while subjects performed calculation tasks that required different amount of effort, correct responses of which were followed by either no reward or fixed compensation. Results showed that high effort induced larger differentiated FRN responses to the reward and non-reward discrepancy across two experimental conditions. Furthermore, P300 manifested valence effect during reward feedback, with more positive amplitudes for reward than for non-reward only in the high effort condition. These results suggest that effort might increase subjective evaluation toward subsequent reward.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In initiation experiments, the more painful the shocks subjects endured to join a group, the more strongly they felt towards the group.
“The more painful these shocks were, the more strongly the subjects felt towards the group (Gerard & Mathewson, 1966, see also Aronson & Mills, 1959, Ma, Meng, Wang, & Shen, 2014).”
From Conative Dissonance (2026) · cites this paper as Ma, Meng, Wang, & Shen, 2014
Cites
The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group.
Aronson, E., & Mills, J. (1959) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0047195 · Cited by 1,297 · cited 1× · see citing works
“On the other hand, other previous literatures revealed that humans prefer conditioned rewards that are earned with greater effort [8].”
BackgroundIndependent Coding of Reward Magnitude and Valence in the Human Brain
Yeung, N., & Sanfey, A. G. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4537-03.2004 · Cited by 933 · see citing works
Separate neural pathways process different decision costs
Rudebeck, P. H., Walton, M. E., Smyth, A. N., Bannerman, D. M., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1756 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
The P300 and reward valence, magnitude, and expectancy in outcome evaluation
Wu, Y., & Zhou, X. (2009) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.06.032 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nanay, B. (2026) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.70258
- Authors
- Ma, Q., Meng, L., Wang, L., & Shen, Q.
- Affiliations
- Zhejiang University (CN)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Shen, Qiang
- Venue
- Behavioural Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 261
- Pages
- 1-7
- ISSN
- 0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072361256
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (71371167, 71071135)
- State Education Ministry of China (2013Z51)
- Social Science Association of Zhejiang Province
- Open Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning of Beijing Normal University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- effort, reward valuation, monetary rewards, feedback-related negativity, P300, reward valence, effort cost, outcome measurement, calculation tasks
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Choice Behavior, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Reaction Time, Reward, Event-Related Potentials, P300, Feedback, Psychological, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review