Copper nanoparticles promote rapid wound healing in acute full thickness defect via acceleration of skin cell migration, proliferation, and neovascularization
Abstract
Worldwide, impaired wound healing leads to a large burden of morbidity and mortality. Current treatments have several limitations. Recently, nanomaterials such as copper nanoparticles (CuNPs) have attracted considerable research interest. Here, we investigated the potential therapeutic effect of various CuNPs concentrations (1 μM, 10 μM, 100 μM, 1 mM, and 10 mM) and sizes (20 nm, 40 nm, 80 nm) in wound healing. Our results revealed that the 10 μM concentration of 40 nm CuNPs and the 1 μM concentration of 80 nm CuNPs were not toxic to the cultured fibroblast, endothelial, and keratinocyte cells, and also 1 μM concentration of 80 nm CuNPs enhanced endothelial cell migration and proliferation. Extensive assessment of in vivo wound healing demonstrated that the 1 μM concentration of 80 nm CuNPs accelerated wound healing over a shorter time via formation of granulation tissue and higher new blood vessels. Importantly, serum biochemical analysis confirmed that the 40 nm CuNP (10 μM) and 80 nm CuNP (1 μM) did not show any accumulation in the liver during wound healing. Overall, our results have indicated that the 1 μM concentration of 80 nm CuNPs is a promising NP for wound healing applications without adverse side effects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Copper-treated wounds show significant increase in VEGF and number of blood vessels compared to controls.
“One of the notorious effects noticed in some of these studies was the significant increase in VEGF and the number of blood vessels in the copper-treated wounds as compared to the controls [72,73,75,77,78,84,97,103].”
From The Journey of Copper-Impregnated Dressings in Wound Healing: From a Medical Hypothesis to Clinical Practice (2025) · cites this paper as [72]
Copper-containing biomaterials consistently demonstrate enhanced healing of non-infected wounds in animal models compared to controls.
“These studies consistently demonstrate enhanced healing of non-infected wounds [71,72,73,74,75,76], including those in diabetic [77,78,79,80,81,82,83] and burn-related [84,85,86,87,88,89,90] animal models when compared to control materials.”
From The Journey of Copper-Impregnated Dressings in Wound Healing: From a Medical Hypothesis to Clinical Practice (2025) · cites this paper as [72]
Cites
Regulation of angiogenesis: Wound healing as a model
EMING, S., BRACHVOGEL, B., ODORISIO, T., & KOCH, M. (2007) · Progress in Histochemistry and Cytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.proghi.2007.06.001 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Molecular mechanisms of enhanced wound healing by copper oxide-impregnated dressings
Borkow, G., Gabbay, J., Dardik, R., Eidelman, A. I., Lavie, Y., Grunfeld, Y., Ikher, S., Huszar, M., Zatcoff, R. C., & Marikovsky, M. (2010) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/j.1524-475x.2010.00573.x · Cited by 253 · see citing works
The neglected role of copper ions in wound healing
Kornblatt, A. P., Nicoletti, V. G., & Travaglia, A. (2016) · Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2016.02.012 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Applications of mesenchymal stem cell-exosome components in wound infection healing: new insights
Fakouri, A., Razavi, Z.-S., Mohammed, A. T., Hussein, A. H. A., Afkhami, H., & Hooshiar, M. H. (2024) · Burns & Trauma · doi:10.1093/burnst/tkae021 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Healing of Chronic Wounds by Copper Oxide-Impregnated Wound Dressings—Case Series
Melamed, E., Kiambi, P., Okoth, D., Honigber, I., Tamir, E., & Borkow, G. (2021) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina57030296 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Borkow, G., & Melamed, E. (2025) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines13030562 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Yang, X., Zhang, Y., Huang, C., Lu, L., Chen, J., & Weng, Y. (2022) · Macromolecular Bioscience · doi:10.1002/mabi.202200019 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Gorel, O., Hamuda, M., Feldman, I., & Kucyn‐Gabovich, I. (2024) · Health Science Reports · doi:10.1002/hsr2.1816 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Alizadeh, S., Seyedalipour, B., Shafieyan, S., Kheime, A., Mohammadi, P., & Aghdami, N.
- Affiliations
- Royan Institute (IR)
- University of Mazandaran (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Mohammadi, Parvaneh
- Aghdami, Nasser
- Venue
- Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 517
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 684-690
- ISSN
- 0006-291X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2966583364
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 9.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Royan Institute
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
- Keywords
- copper nanoparticles, wound healing, full-thickness skin defect, cell proliferation, neovascularization, endothelial cells, keratinocytes, fibroblasts, nanoparticle size, nanoparticle concentration, granulation tissue, nanoparticle toxicity, liver accumulation, nanomedicine
- MeSH terms
- Cell Movement, Cell Survival, Collagen, Copper, Fibroblasts, Humans, Liver, Skin, Wound Healing, Cell Death, Neovascularization, Physiologic, Endothelial Cells, Cell Proliferation, Metal Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review