The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Yeasts in sustainable bioethanol production: A review
Open accessAbstract
Bioethanol has been identified as the mostly used biofuel worldwide since it significantly contributes to the reduction of crude oil consumption and environmental pollution. It can be produced from various types of feedstocks such as sucrose, starch, lignocellulosic and algal biomass through fermentation process by microorganisms. Compared to other types of microoganisms, yeasts especially Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the common microbes employed in ethanol production due to its high ethanol productivity, high ethanol tolerance and ability of fermenting wide range of sugars. However, there are some challenges in yeast fermentation which inhibit ethanol production such as high temperature, high ethanol concentration and the ability to ferment pentose sugars. Various types of yeast strains have been used in fermentation for ethanol production including hybrid, recombinant and wild-type yeasts. Yeasts can directly ferment simple sugars into ethanol while other type of feedstocks must be converted to fermentable sugars before it can be fermented to ethanol. The common processes involves in ethanol production are pretreatment, hydrolysis and fermentation. Production of bioethanol during fermentation depends on several factors such as temperature, sugar concentration, pH, fermentation time, agitation rate, and inoculum size. The efficiency and productivity of ethanol can be enhanced by immobilizing the yeast cells. This review highlights the different types of yeast strains, fermentation process, factors affecting bioethanol production and immobilization of yeasts for better bioethanol production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Alvira, P., Tomás-Pejó, E., Ballesteros, M., & Negro, M. J. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.093 · Cited by 3,912 · cited 1×
“This is contributed by the attractive features of steam explosion which has less environmental impact, low capital investment, high energy efficiency, less hazardous process chemicals and conditions and complete sugar recovery [83].”
BackgroundProduction of liquid biofuels from renewable resources
Nigam, P. S., & Singh, A. (2011) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2010.01.003 · Cited by 2,156
Engineering Yeast Transcription Machinery for Improved Ethanol Tolerance and Production
Alper, H., Moxley, J., Nevoigt, E., Fink, G. R., & Stephanopoulos, G. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1131969 · Cited by 823 · cited 1×
“analysis has revealed the structure and DNA binding elements of these regulatory proteins [27].”
BackgroundFactors affecting ethanol fermentation using Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4742
Lin, Y., Zhang, W., Li, C., Sakakibara, K., Tanaka, S., & Kong, H. (2012) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.019 · Cited by 313
Cited by
Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its industrial applications
Parapouli, M., 1 Molecular Biology laboratory, D. O. B. A. A. T., Vasileiadi, A., Afendra, A.-S., Hatziloukas, E., 2 Genetics laboratory, D. O. B. A. A. T., & equally, #. T. T. A. C. (2020) · AIMS Microbiology · doi:10.3934/microbiol.2020001 · Cited by 685
Review of Second-Generation Bioethanol Production from Residual Biomass
Lodz University of Technology, F. O. B. A. F. S., Robak, K., Balcerek, M., & Lodz University of Technology, F. O. B. A. F. S. (2018) · Food Technology and Biotechnology · doi:10.17113/ftb.56.02.18.5428 · Cited by 649
Zhang, B., Biswal, B. K., Zhang, J., & Balasubramanian, R. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00673 · Cited by 432
Application of nanoparticles in biofuels: An overview
Sekoai, P. T., Ouma, C. N. M., du Preez, S. P., Modisha, P., Engelbrecht, N., Bessarabov, D. G., & Ghimire, A. (2019) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2018.10.030 · Cited by 384
Bioethanol Production by Enzymatic Hydrolysis from Different Lignocellulosic Sources
Vasić, K., Knez, Ž., & Leitgeb, M. (2021) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules26030753 · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohd Azhar, S. H., Abdulla, R., Jambo, S. A., Marbawi, H., Gansau, J. A., Mohd Faik, A. A., & Rodrigues, K. F.
- Venue
- Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 52-61
- ISSN
- 2405-5808 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2593138759
- Cited by
- 922
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 35.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Yeasts in sustainable bioethanol production: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bbrep.2017.03.003
- The paper
- Mohd Azhar, S. H., Abdulla, R., Jambo, S. A., Marbawi, H., Gansau, J. A., Mohd Faik, A. A., & Rodrigues, K. F. (2017). Yeasts in sustainable bioethanol production: A review. Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep.2017.03.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.